Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Miscellaneous and Off Topic Forums > Off Topic Discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
rsrguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ut
Posts: 4,940
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to rsrguy






__________________
Guy Zindel
Old 07-31-2024, 07:12 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3061 (permalink)
Registered
 
ckissick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the beach
Posts: 5,155
My daughter just got a job at Epic Aircraft in Bend, OR. She'll be doing materials testing in the lab. They make a pretty nice turbo-prop.

__________________
Charlie
1966 912 Polo Red
1950 VW Bug
1983 VW Westfalia; 1989 VW Syncro Tristar Doka
Old 08-01-2024, 12:17 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3062 (permalink)
Registered
 
rsrguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ut
Posts: 4,940
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to rsrguy





__________________
Guy Zindel
Old 08-01-2024, 08:10 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3063 (permalink)
Registered
 
rsrguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ut
Posts: 4,940
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to rsrguy





__________________
Guy Zindel
Old 08-01-2024, 08:17 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3064 (permalink)
Registered
 
rsrguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ut
Posts: 4,940
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to rsrguy





__________________
Guy Zindel
Old 08-01-2024, 08:26 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3065 (permalink)
Registered
 
rsrguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ut
Posts: 4,940
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to rsrguy






__________________
Guy Zindel
Old 08-01-2024, 08:31 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3066 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
rsrguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ut
Posts: 4,940
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to rsrguy



__________________
Guy Zindel
Old 08-01-2024, 08:38 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3067 (permalink)
Registered
 
rsrguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ut
Posts: 4,940
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to rsrguy


__________________
Guy Zindel
Old 08-01-2024, 08:42 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3068 (permalink)
Run smooth, run fast
 
Heel n Toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,450
__________________
- John
"We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline."
Old 08-01-2024, 11:27 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3069 (permalink)
Grip It & Rip It
 
edgemar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,244
__________________
82 911SC (sold)
Old 08-04-2024, 02:20 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3070 (permalink)
My other ride is a C-130J
 
RNajarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,307
Garage
The unit featured in the above MAFFS video is the 146th AW of the CA Air National Guard, of which I have been a member of for 30 years.

Today we had a fantastic party celebrating our 100th anniversary as an Air Wing. Too bad I can’t upload any videos, but here are some still shots.








__________________
1975 911 Targa S 3.0 2000 911 Carrera Cab 2005 Cayenne Titanium Metallic
2022 Mercedes-Benz E450 Coupé 2020 Mercedes-Benz E350 2006 ACG Hummer
Previously Owned Art from Stuttgart
2000 Boxster -1983 911 SC Cab -1984 944 N/A
Old 08-04-2024, 05:25 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3071 (permalink)
Run smooth, run fast
 
Heel n Toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,450


How did the P-47 fly faster than the P-51 given that it was so non-aerodynamic compared to the 51?


The P-47 Thunderbolt and the P-51 Mustang were both designed and built for different purposes, but they both achieved great success in combat. The P-47 was a heavy fighter-bomber that could carry a large payload of bombs and rockets, while the P-51 was a long-range escort fighter that could protect the bombers from enemy fighters. Both planes had their advantages and disadvantages.

The answer is not so simple but in general, the P-51 was faster than the P-47 at low and medium altitudes, while the P-47 was faster than the P-51 at high altitudes. The reason for this is mainly due to the different engines and turbochargers that each plane used. The P-51 used a Packard V-1650 Merlin engine, which was a liquid-cooled V12 engine that produced 1,720 horsepower. The P-47 used a Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp engine, which was an air-cooled radial engine that produced 2,500 horsepower. The Merlin engine had a better power-to-weight ratio and was more efficient than the Double Wasp engine, which gave the P-51 an edge at lower altitudes.

The Double Wasp engine had a huge turbocharger that boosted its performance at higher altitudes. A turbocharger is a device that compresses the air entering the engine, increasing its density and oxygen content. This allows the engine to burn more fuel and produce more power. The turbocharger of the P-47 was located behind the cockpit and connected to the engine by a long duct. The duct had an intercooler that cooled down the compressed air before it reached the engine.

The turbocharger of the P-47 was very effective at high altitudes, where the air pressure and temperature were lower. It could maintain a constant manifold pressure of 52 inches of mercury up to 30,000 feet, while the Merlin engine could only reach 42 inches of mercury at 25,000 feet. This gave the P-47 a significant advantage in speed and climb rate at high altitudes, where it could reach over 700 km/h.

The aerodynamics of each plane also played a role in their speed performance. The P-51 had a sleek and streamlined design that reduced drag and increased lift. It also had laminar flow wings that smoothed out the airflow over the wing surface, further reducing drag. The P-47 had a bulky and rugged design that increased drag and weight. It also had conventional wings that created more turbulence and drag. The aerodynamics of the P-51 gave it an edge in maneuverability and agility over the P-47.

So, to sum up, the P-51 was faster than the P-47 at low and medium altitudes because of its lighter weight, more efficient engine, and better aerodynamics. The P-47 was faster than the P-51 at high altitudes because of its powerful turbocharger and larger engine. Both planes were excellent fighters that served their roles well in World War II.
__________________
- John
"We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline."
Old 08-09-2024, 11:41 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3072 (permalink)
Non Compos Mentis
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,630
Early adjustable-pitch prop

Old 08-10-2024, 05:57 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3073 (permalink)
Registered
 
astrochex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Space Coast
Posts: 5,402
More bad for Boeing, https://dailycaller.com/2024/08/09/things-just-got-worse-boeing/
__________________
Paul
82 911SC - 3 yrs of fun (traded-in)
2011 Cayman (simply amazing, smiles for miles)
Old 08-10-2024, 09:03 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3074 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 14,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heel n Toe View Post


How did the P-47 fly faster than the P-51 given that it was so non-aerodynamic compared to the 51?


The P-47 Thunderbolt and the P-51 Mustang were both designed and built for different purposes, but they both achieved great success in combat. The P-47 was a heavy fighter-bomber that could carry a large payload of bombs and rockets, while the P-51 was a long-range escort fighter that could protect the bombers from enemy fighters. Both planes had their advantages and disadvantages.

The answer is not so simple but in general, the P-51 was faster than the P-47 at low and medium altitudes, while the P-47 was faster than the P-51 at high altitudes. The reason for this is mainly due to the different engines and turbochargers that each plane used. The P-51 used a Packard V-1650 Merlin engine, which was a liquid-cooled V12 engine that produced 1,720 horsepower. The P-47 used a Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp engine, which was an air-cooled radial engine that produced 2,500 horsepower. The Merlin engine had a better power-to-weight ratio and was more efficient than the Double Wasp engine, which gave the P-51 an edge at lower altitudes.

The Double Wasp engine had a huge turbocharger that boosted its performance at higher altitudes. A turbocharger is a device that compresses the air entering the engine, increasing its density and oxygen content. This allows the engine to burn more fuel and produce more power. The turbocharger of the P-47 was located behind the cockpit and connected to the engine by a long duct. The duct had an intercooler that cooled down the compressed air before it reached the engine.

The turbocharger of the P-47 was very effective at high altitudes, where the air pressure and temperature were lower. It could maintain a constant manifold pressure of 52 inches of mercury up to 30,000 feet, while the Merlin engine could only reach 42 inches of mercury at 25,000 feet. This gave the P-47 a significant advantage in speed and climb rate at high altitudes, where it could reach over 700 km/h.

The aerodynamics of each plane also played a role in their speed performance. The P-51 had a sleek and streamlined design that reduced drag and increased lift. It also had laminar flow wings that smoothed out the airflow over the wing surface, further reducing drag. The P-47 had a bulky and rugged design that increased drag and weight. It also had conventional wings that created more turbulence and drag. The aerodynamics of the P-51 gave it an edge in maneuverability and agility over the P-47.

So, to sum up, the P-51 was faster than the P-47 at low and medium altitudes because of its lighter weight, more efficient engine, and better aerodynamics. The P-47 was faster than the P-51 at high altitudes because of its powerful turbocharger and larger engine. Both planes were excellent fighters that served their roles well in World War II.
__________________
We are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.
Old 08-10-2024, 09:17 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3075 (permalink)
Registered
 
A930Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mount Pleasant, South Carolina
Posts: 14,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by astrochex View Post
Not to mention Boeings Starliner stuck at the space station. It might be six more months before the astronauts can come back home.
Old 08-10-2024, 10:06 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3076 (permalink)
Registered
 
rsrguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ut
Posts: 4,940
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to rsrguy
If it's Boeing I ain't goin....
__________________
Guy Zindel
Old 08-10-2024, 11:09 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3077 (permalink)
KNS KNS is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 7,095
Yikes - That Boeing story is bad. I wonder if the news will find it's way up to the ISS and the stranded astronauts. Can you imagine reading that article - I'd be asking for a trip home on Musk's spacecraft.

Perhaps it's time for a new builder of airliners to take the place of Boeing. Space X and Sierra Nevada are already building spacecraft. The Blended Wing Body (BWB) looks interesting.

https://www.jetzero.aero/
__________________
Kurt
Old 08-10-2024, 12:07 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3078 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
astrochex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Space Coast
Posts: 5,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by KNS View Post
Yikes - That Boeing story is bad. I wonder if the news will find it's way up to the ISS and the stranded astronauts. Can you imagine reading that article - I'd be asking for a trip home on Musk's spacecraft.

Perhaps it's time for a new builder of airliners to take the place of Boeing. Space X and Sierra Nevada are already building spacecraft. The Blended Wing Body (BWB) looks interesting.

https://www.jetzero.aero/
The BWB was developed by MDC, but Boeing was not fond of the concept. The folks behind the design, Mark Page, Dr. Leibeck, and Blaine Rawden are all at JetZero. They are teamed with Scaled Composites for a large-scale flying demonstrator.
__________________
Paul
82 911SC - 3 yrs of fun (traded-in)
2011 Cayman (simply amazing, smiles for miles)
Old 08-10-2024, 12:18 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3079 (permalink)
My other ride is a C-130J
 
RNajarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,307
Garage
Kodiak Alaska February 2008.

The Coast Guard was kind enough to give us a lift from village to village.

In this photo two Marine reservists and a Coast Guard dental tech secure our equipment as the Jayhawk takes off.

I think the Jayhawk is related to Paul. 😄



__________________
1975 911 Targa S 3.0 2000 911 Carrera Cab 2005 Cayenne Titanium Metallic
2022 Mercedes-Benz E450 Coupé 2020 Mercedes-Benz E350 2006 ACG Hummer
Previously Owned Art from Stuttgart
2000 Boxster -1983 911 SC Cab -1984 944 N/A
Old 08-10-2024, 12:33 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3080 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:38 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.