|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
Counterclockwise?
|
I can see the novelty of a drone would wear off pretty quick.
Maybe I have a short attention span. What were we talking about again?
__________________
Rod 1986 Carrera 2001 996TT A bunch of stuff with spark plugs |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I know, the media is the largest issue. Nothing against all y'all. These are just radio controlled quad copters. Just because they are easy to fly or that they can carry a camera doesn't make them drones.
I am a big proponent of RC flying and have some aircraft at the house, but the quad copters with the tech these days are easy enough to fly and cheap enough to fly they can be bought and flown by anyone that doesn't care. Just like the laser pointers getting shone in pilots eyes. If more people had brains this wouldn't be an issue. If more people were made an example of it might diminish the idiocy somewhat. Now y'all can get off my airspace.
__________________
Brent The X15 was the only aircraft I flew where I was glad the engine quit. - Milt Thompson. "Don't get so caught up in your right to dissent that you forget your obligation to contribute." Mrs. James to her son Chappie. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,354
|
I've been an RC modeler and member of the AMA (Academy of Model Aeronautics) for the last 44 years. I pretty much quit flying models in the summer of 2015 just prior to the "Great Drone Christmas Threat" of 2015 that instigated the FAA registration policy. Never did send them my info or my $5 bill to join their "Registry".
Just two nights ago, the local AMA clubs had a meeting with the local FAA guys to discuss current laws, regulations etc. It's my understanding, from the FAA website, that models weighing less than 0.55 lbs./250 Grams can still be flown without having to register with the FAA as a "Recreational Drone Pilot". I quickly learned that according to the FAA's "Grid Map", my residence near the local airport permits flight up to 200 feet AGL, yet to actually fly my 2 oz. foam model in the culdesac in front of my house, at mailbox height altitude, would require me to use an app on my phone (or pc) to contact their "LAANC" system where I would then input my FAA registration number (that I don't have), my location and the time frame I would be operating my model. That's pretty damn absurd in my opinion. There was mention of DJI (THE quad copter/drone proliferator) rolling out their latest model just the other day, the "Mavic Mini", that weighs all of 249 Grams ready to fly. So there must be SOME reason why DJI engineered, constructed and marketed a model that falls under the 0.55 lbs./250 gram threshold, but I've yet to figure that out. |
||
|
|
|
|
Get off my lawn!
|
Quote:
Many are just someone that bought a DJI- pro and proclaim themselves aerial photographers. For flying a house or a simple business is easy and the real estate folks love em. We flew the FAA campus here is OKC, for the FAA. is was a total pain in the butt just to get on campus to deliver the prints in person. Flying the site in an airplane was nothing very special or difficult. ![]() We flew the OU-TX game a few weeks back. All 100% legal. Try that with a DJI.
__________________
Glen 49 Year member of the Porsche Club of America 1985 911 Carrera; 2017 Macan 1986 El Camino with Fuel Injected 350 Crate Engine My Motto: I will never be too old to have a happy childhood! |
||
|
|
|
|
White and Nerdy
|
Quote:
That was years ago, and I wondered about flying in contraband via stealth RC vehicles. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
....
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,830
|
That is the most idiotic thing I have heard today... And I heard a lot of stupid **** from kids today.
__________________
dolor et pavor Copyright |
||
|
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
Too big to fail
|
Here's a clip of a crowd taking down a drone with laser pointers
__________________
"You go to the track with the Porsche you have, not the Porsche you wish you had." '03 E46 M3 '57 356A Various VWs |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 31,824
|
Quote:
I was in the commercial UAS business (which I sold) and now make UAS for commercial and DoD markets. We did a lot of exhaustive market analysis and picked our target markets accordingly. The best run group was the Forest Service and their folks out of Montana. There had their stuff wired. On a large, active fire, the FS will generally declare the area a temporary restricted area for commercial and military flights - FS and other support aircraft only. They publish the information in what are called NOTAMs - Notice to Airmen. Smaller fires as well get the same treatment by local jurisdictions if aircraft are employed to fight the fire. As you can imagine, the sky gets busy and the pilots need to know they can maneuver at will making their drops. What the FS wanted from UAS EO/IR cameras when IFR conditions exist - they wanted to be able to track hot spots when manned aircraft can not fly. They also wanted post fire inspections, communications relay, etc. The FS folks we dealt with, as well as smaller fire-fighting organizations were ultra professional and had metrics to back up their operational processes. The rise in UAS capability, especially beyond the hobby drones, is really something. We are working with the US Navy on a UAS that can swim through the water and then go airborne. True story.
__________________
1996 FJ80. Last edited by Seahawk; 11-13-2019 at 08:41 AM.. |
||
|
|
|