|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,846
|
Is Muscle dead?
Something to watch while pondering the question.
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.) |
||
|
|
|
|
Brew Master
|
IDK about "dead" maybe just evolving.
__________________
Nick |
||
|
|
|
|
Southern Class & Sass
|
Muscle, as we know it, is all but dead. It's being replaced by 8,000 lbs overly complex, monsterous SUVs that will drive themselves. Soon enough our grand-children will ask, "Grandpa, back in the olden days when you had to drive yourself, how did you avoid the chariots and horses?"
__________________
Dixie Bradenton, FL 2013 Camaro ZL1 |
||
|
|
|
|
Get off my lawn!
|
I was behind a Tesla the other day as we got on the interstate. The driver eased onto the on ramp at 30 MPH and then punched it and it was up to 70. My old cars have to build speed from the start of the on ramp.
Just a week ago I "got" to drive that wonderful twisty mountain road, I-70 through Kansas all the way to Boulder, CO. Miles and miles of nothing but miles and miles. There were no electric cars out there. My 40 year old antique 911 is such a great highway car, and fun on the track as well. 1,500 miles round trip. 450 to 500 miles on a tank of gas depending on speed.
__________________
Glen 49 Year member of the Porsche Club of America 1985 911 Carrera; 2017 Macan 1986 El Camino with Fuel Injected 350 Crate Engine My Motto: I will never be too old to have a happy childhood! |
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St Paul MN
Posts: 19,420
|
the reality was muscle was never really a thing.
i mean go back and read/watch some old car reviews. most muscle cars were slow AF. 14-16 second quarter miles, etc etc. SAE gross power, simply made up power figures ... like lots of shens going on there. but the performance was never really there. no one could jump an apple with their front tires, no one couldnt touch the dash ... etc etc. none of this was real. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrEL2OQkvOY old muscle cars have been tainted by modern performance engineering, and rose tinted glasses. those cars can be plenty fast, with much more modern CNC heads/headers/carbs, modern tires, suspension, etc etc. but stock, these cars were never fast. all those stories are largely just ... not true. now, maybe you could do some of the stories, but back then ... nope. not even close. for context, a gr86 does 0-60 in 6.5, and the quarter in 14.0 at 101. so like if you can touch the dashboard in that car (and you can), you could touch the dashboard in these old cars. no one was jumping the front tires etc. Last edited by cockerpunk; 07-02-2025 at 07:10 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Kind of Blue
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,317
|
Muscle cars, as live axle high horsepower boats, really don't make sense in a world of 500+ horsepower SUVs that handle like cars and don't break axles every time you launch hard.
__________________
1971 911T w/ a 2.7 (ITBs, EFI, a bunch of other stuff, 2180 pounds with fuel) 2024 Ford Bronco Raptor |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Did you get the memo?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 33,114
|
If you watch the market, customer interest is definitely shifting away from the muscle car type genre. The Mustang is the only new one left, unless you count the strange turn that Dodge took with making the Challenger an EV or straight six. The classic muscle cars are declining in value if you watch auction results or the Hagerty market index. Which as CP accurately pointed out were never really that much muscle back in the day, but nostalgia is a powerful drug. You could even make the argument that the V8 is a dying breed, not many of them left in new cars.
__________________
‘07 Mazda RX8 Past: 911T, 911SC, Carrera, 951s, 955, 996s, 987s, 986s, 997s, BMW 5x, C36, C63, XJR, S8, Maserati Coupe, GT500, etc |
||
|
|
|
|
Fleabit peanut monkey
|
Quote:
There's more to it than ludicrist mode. Yes, you are correct but it's not the same and I know you weren't talking about electric cars. There is the 3.2 beer factor and being 16 that helps too.
__________________
1981 911SC Targa |
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St Paul MN
Posts: 19,420
|
Quote:
i have been in quad power figure old muscle cars, when the launch, and they are indeed a sensation. thats all however modern engineering. all of it. basically nothing that makes the car that way, is old. but im talking about the hyperbole that gets tossed around these cars. how many gas station stories have i herd about hemis, and cuddas and GT this's and thats about the front wheels hopping over an apple, or not being able to grab 100 dollar bill taped to the dash ... if ive herd one, ive herd 100. and just none of that is true. zero. zilch. none. a gt86 or ND2/3 miata is just as quick as these old cars. and none of those cars hop apples, or you cant touch the dash etc etc. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Higgs Field
Posts: 22,790
|
In a word, "tires". Those who were not around to experience muscle cars in their heyday would also have no way of remembering just how terrible tires were back then. The horsepower numbers were not inflated. Many were actually deflated in the interest in keeping them insurable.
Quarter mile times dropped dramatically with the addition of decent tires under the backs of those cars. Often by two seconds or more when they ran on slicks. A couple of my cars that did struggle to run low 14's on street tires easily dropped into the 12's on slicks, with one of them well down into the 11's. Tire technology has evolved dramatically in the last couple of decades alone, much more so since the '60's and '70's. One very clear indicator was when the 718 Boxster was touted as beating the Carrera GT's time around the Nurburgring. Yes, it did. The Carrera GT's original time, in period, on the rubber available then. Someone then put that Carrera GT on today's rubber and absolutely buried that 718's time. It's all about the tires.
__________________
Jeff '72 911T 3.0 MFI '93 Ducati 900 Super Sport "God invented whiskey so the Irish wouldn't rule the world" |
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St Paul MN
Posts: 19,420
|
next hot take ... american muscle is alive and well ... its just teslas/EVs
|
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St Paul MN
Posts: 19,420
|
Quote:
but the power figures were wrong. look up SAE gross vs net. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,846
|
Some real numbers from the glory days of Muscle..
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.) |
||
|
|
|
|
Model Citizen
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Voodoo Lounge
Posts: 19,400
|
^ What the heck is that thing? Chargallenger? Cuperbee?
AI strikes again. The double front side markers are cool!
__________________
"I would be a tone-deaf heathen if I didn't call the engine astounding. If it had been invented solely to make noise, there would be shrines to it in Rome" |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Woodlands TX
Posts: 4,023
|
I haven't heard muscle car folklore in 25 years. Not a single semi educated car enthusiast things these cars were fast in the modern context.
It held up until the mid 90s, the last time a mid 13s quartermile was fast. Big hp wasnt cheap/easy until post 2000ish though. Doesnt seem that long ago when a 930 was considered a good platform for cheap horsepower, seems absurd now
__________________
84 930 18 Cayman GTS |
||
|
|
|
|
likes to left foot brake.
|
I'm a renaissance racer.
The performance and experience of 12 years racing 700hp 2500lb tube chassis V8 race cars with dog ring trans, big brakes, big slicks has ruined my infatuation with any old or new production muscle, pony or sports street cars. Slow heavy over optioned luxury performance status cars do not appeal to me. Although not my cup of tea I did test drive a Mach E that accelerated very quickly with 3 people inside and it, made me grin for second. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Napa
Posts: 2,380
|
Now you could put that 20 on the ɗash and bet the FRONT seat passenger in a hipo ev
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Woodlands TX
Posts: 4,023
|
The limits of acceleration of any car regardless of power on modern street performance tires is 1.2 ish g. Reaching forward while accelerating at this rate is 20% harder than sitting up from the lying position.
Most people can do that no problem
__________________
84 930 18 Cayman GTS |
||
|
|
|
|
Brew Master
|
But can they do it after a few beers!???
__________________
Nick |
||
|
|
|
|
Fleabit peanut monkey
|
Today's beers are much more powerful so you can't really compare.
__________________
1981 911SC Targa |
||
|
|
|