|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 633
|
The bill is in the Assembly, where as I expected, it’s getting evicerated.
The last amendment in the assembly was to make it so there would be no smog required on transfer or ownership, but would be required every 2 years after that. Which of course makes no sense and is useless. But things are still being negotiated. The deadline is mid August, so there’s still some time. I’m hopeful, but not optimistic that anything useful will come out of it. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
So did the legislation die?
__________________
David 1972 911T/S MFI Survivor |
||
|
|
|
|
Driver, not Mechanic
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,024
|
It's a watered down version of the original.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Control Group
|
No way this ever flies without increased revenue to the state.
Write a bill where they charge high enough fees for a vintage vehicle registrations that California nets significantly more than they would have gotten off smog testing and it will FLY though both houses like grift through a politician
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
David 1972 911T/S MFI Survivor |
||
|
|
|