Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/index.php)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Lord Stanley (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=469574)

Buckterrier 04-17-2009 07:31 PM

Lord Stanley
 
Penquins just beat the Flyers in OT to go up 2-0 in the series. Wouldn't it be just peachy to have the Stanley Cup & the Lombardi Trophy both in the steel citay :D

Aerkuld 04-17-2009 08:03 PM

The two Flyers players who gave the Penguins a 5 on 3 power play must be kicking themselves. There's no excuse for that kind of behavior when the pressures on like that. They lost their team the game. I'm glad the Penguins won!

Por_sha911 04-17-2009 08:14 PM

What a game! The Flyers in the sin-bin gave the game to the Pens. As far as the cup in concerned, you'll have to visit Boston to see it.

Mr_Wizard 04-17-2009 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckterrier (Post 4613137)
Penquins just beat the Flyers in OT to go up 2-0 in the series. Wouldn't it be just peachy to have the Stanley Cup & the Lombardi Trophy both in the steel citay :D

Hate to break it to ya, the road to the Stanley Cup runs through Detroit. Pen's could not handle the Wings last year and I see more of the same this year if they meet.

AbbyAk 04-17-2009 10:41 PM

Richards had the game on his stick--to make it 3-1 but Marc Andre Fleury ( best YOUNG goalie in the NHL) made an unbelievable leg save.

I do agree Detroit is a machine and the Ducks are the best 8th seed in the league. This will be an interesting play-off for sure.

A.B.

m21sniper 04-17-2009 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckterrier (Post 4613137)
Penquins just beat the Flyers in OT to go up 2-0 in the series. Wouldn't it be just peachy to have the Stanley Cup & the Lombardi Trophy both in the steel citay :D

Not that anyone outside pittsburgh would care. ;)

I didn't even realize the playoffs were under way. Hockey is too flukey a sport for me. Too many games are decided by totally random deflections and dumb luck. I just cannot get into it like i once did.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Wizard (Post 4613350)
Hate to break it to ya, the road to the Stanley Cup runs through Detroit. Pen's could not handle the Wings last year and I see more of the same this year if they meet.

I hate the detroit red army team.

Honestly, that team should be deported back to the Rodina where they belong.

AbbyAk 04-17-2009 10:57 PM

Ummm...

They are mostly Swedes in Detroit these days..Datsyuk would be the prominent Russian--some eastern European guys(Hudler, Hossa), but not that Russian these days..but a very good team..

And yes, I would like to see someone else win it this year.....

m21sniper 04-17-2009 11:57 PM

They will forever be stinkin' commies to me. ;)

Zef 04-18-2009 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 4613415)
Not that anyone outside pittsburgh would care. ;)

I didn't even realize the playoffs were under way. Hockey is too flukey a sport for me. Too many games are decided by totally random deflections and dumb luck. I just cannot get into it like i once did.
.

Same for me...I'm totally out of that for years.....

Buckterrier 04-18-2009 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Por_sha911 (Post 4613198)
What a game! The Flyers in the sin-bin gave the game to the Pens. As far as the cup in concerned, you'll have to visit Boston to see it.

That may very well be true. And if they meet it will be a good series for sure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Wizard (Post 4613350)
Hate to break it to ya, the road to the Stanley Cup runs through Detroit. Pen's could not handle the Wings last year and I see more of the same this year if they meet.

Maybe they couldn't handle the Wings, ( I lived in Michigan for a few years I like the Red Wings), but they fought litterally to the last second. Experience would help this go-around.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zef (Post 4613567)
Same for me...I'm totally out of that for years.....

:eek: A Canadain not liking hockey???!!!!! Isn't that like a greedy capitalist not liking money???!!!!

Sniper, you stick with wooing the ladies ;)

Monza_dh 04-18-2009 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Por_sha911 (Post 4613198)
What a game! The Flyers in the sin-bin gave the game to the Pens. As far as the cup in concerned, you'll have to visit Boston to see it.


Thats right baby!!!!

The B's are the reel deal!!


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1240057466.jpg

Porsche_monkey 04-18-2009 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Wizard (Post 4613350)
Hate to break it to ya, the road to the Stanley Cup runs through Detroit.

Don't think so. The west has too many good teams for anyone to be a lock. And lots of teams with great, as opposed to adequate, goalies.

And I'm not a Detroit hater, just a student of hockey and statistics.

Taz's Master 04-18-2009 09:14 AM

A Pens or Flyers Cup would bring Pennsylvania yet another championship. Surely Obama's policies will level the playing field (so to speak) and allow another state to feel like champions too?

Porsche_monkey 04-18-2009 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taz's Master (Post 4613895)
A Pens or Flyers Cup would bring Pennsylvania yet another championship.

I believe the West is too strong. Maybe if they beat the crap out of each other getting to the final, but otherwise, I just can't see a team from the East winning. Penguins are not as good as last year, and the Flyers take too many dumb penalties. It's not 1975 any more.

m21sniper 04-18-2009 02:21 PM

The flyers problem the last 20 years has been a lack of a blue chip goalie.

Put Patrick Roy in the pipes during the Lindros-Leclair-Legion of Doom era and they could have probably won 4 or 5 cups.

Hockey is ALL about the goaltending.

Rick V 04-18-2009 03:10 PM

Only the lord saved more than Bernie Parant

Buckterrier 04-18-2009 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porsche_monkey (Post 4614269)
Penguins are not as good as last year, and the Flyers take too many dumb penalties.

I'd argue that point, (not the Flyers, you are correct in that statement). After a few injured players came back and switching coaches they went 18-3-4 in their last 25 games. And of course Fleury is playing lights out. Haven't seen the Bruins play this year. But they are the #1 seed in the east. Will watch this evening and see how good they really are.

m21sniper 04-18-2009 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick V (Post 4614314)
Only the lord saved more than Bernie Parent

Yep.

"Only God saves more."

Porsche_monkey 04-18-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 4614278)
Hockey is ALL about the goaltending.

The statistics do not back you up. Check save percentages (both career and series) for Osgood and Barasso. Lots of 'mediocre' goalies have won the Stanley Cup. A great goalie can help you win. It is not an absolute necessity.

Porsche_monkey 04-18-2009 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckterrier (Post 4614370)
I'd argue that point, ...they went 18-3-4 in their last 25 games. And of course Fleury is playing lights out. Haven't seen the Bruins play this year. But they are the #1 seed in the east. Will watch this evening and see how good they really are.

The Bruins are solid top to bottom. Enough speed to beat the West? Don't see that. Tim Thomas, iffy on him too. He can be great. Or awful.

Who replaces Hossa and Armstrong on the Penguins? No one equivalent. They are still good, and they benefited from a coaching change and shear desperation to make the playoffs. But they still aren't as good as last year IMO.

m21sniper 04-18-2009 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porsche_monkey (Post 4614415)
The statistics do not back you up. Check save percentages (both career and series) for Osgood and Barasso. Lots of 'mediocre' goalies have won the Stanley Cup. A great goalie can help you win. It is not an absolute necessity.

The statistics do back me up. The majority of stanley cups have been won by dominating goal tenders.

Would you really argue that putting Roy on the Flyers Legion of Doom teams would not have resulted in numerous stanley cup championships?

Those teams had everything but great goal tending.

Conversely, put the typical average goal tender in net for the Devils and there is no way, no way in hell, they win all those stanley cups.

I'm not into hockey now, but all through the 80s and 90s i was.

Zef 04-18-2009 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckterrier (Post 4613579)
That may very well be true. And if they meet it will
A Canadain not liking hockey???!!!!! Isn't that like a greedy capitalist not liking money? ;)

The interest is gone for some years....I liked a lot the NY Islanders in the eighties with Bossy-Trottier-Gillies-Potvin-Smith-...The interest just went away.....:(

Rick V 04-18-2009 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 4614398)
Yep.

"Only God saves more."

Dude you are not old enough to remember that bumpersticker

m21sniper 04-18-2009 06:18 PM

Yes i am (though just barely). :)

I remember when the Bullies beat(literally) the Russians too. Ran the "best team on earth" with the "best goaler to ever live" right out of the damn Spectrum.

The Reds wouldn't even finish the game until Flyers owner Ed Snyder threatened to not pay them.

Cowardly commie punks.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sQ5YKQrEqRk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sQ5YKQrEqRk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bE72Unn_E1A&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bE72Unn_E1A&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

TimT 04-18-2009 06:27 PM

Quote:

I liked a lot the NY Islanders in the eighties with Bossy-Trottier-Gillies-Potvin-Smith-
"The drive for five"

I was at the last series of playoff games where the Islanders came so close to their fifth Stanley Cup...

Alas it didn't happen. That was some good Hockey

Porsche_monkey 04-18-2009 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 4614278)
Hockey is ALL about the goaltending.

So you are picking Columbus over Detroit? After all, no sane knowledgeable hockey person would pick Osgood over Mason.

Statistics are NUMBERS. Not a gut feel, a supposition, or a half formed thought.

Recent Stanley Cup winners career save %

C. Ward - 0.893
N. Khabibulin - 0.908
D. Hasek 0.923
E. Belfour - 0.906
C. Osgood 0.907
T. Barasso 0.892

There are some dominating and some mediocre numbers in that list. Admit it or not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 4614426)
The statistics do back me up.

You forgot to show your statistics

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 4614426)
Conversely, put the typical average goal tender in net for the Devils and there is no way, no way in hell, they win all those stanley cups.

Actually the Devils had their best stretch of the season, statistically speaking, when Brodeur was hurt. Their game is all about limiting shots, forcing shooters to the periphery, and making the goalies job easy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 4614426)
I'm not into hockey now, but all through the 80s and 90s i was.

It shows.

m21sniper 04-18-2009 06:38 PM

If you are going to attempt to argue that the Devils were anywhere near as good without Brodeur i must seriously question your hockey knowledge.

The majority of Stanley cups have been won by dominant goalers. A average goaler winning the stanley cup is an exception, not a rule- and in almost all cases said average goalers get RED hot during their playoff runs.

But alas, i really don't care to argue the point much for hockey is really just a 2nd tier sport in this country. :)

Sonic dB 04-18-2009 06:45 PM

Chris Osgood moves up to #4 all time in playoff shutouts, along with in the top 5 all time playoff wins and top 10 all time wins. Do the math.

89911 04-18-2009 06:48 PM

The Pen's ARE better this year. The trades made, coaching change, and health (Crosby) make this a better team. As far as who cares, most are right. Quick, who won the cup 2 years ago? I find hockey the 2nd most interesting sport to watch, especially now with HD TV.

m21sniper 04-18-2009 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sonic dB (Post 4614523)
Chris Osgood moves up to #4 all time in playoff shutouts, along with in the top 5 all time playoff wins and top 10 all time wins. Do the math.

But he's not that good.....

Por_sha911 04-19-2009 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rick v (Post 4614314)
only the lord saved more than bernie parant

lol!

Por_sha911 04-19-2009 12:10 PM

In the playoffs
-A bad goalie will guarantee an early vacation but a great goalie does not mean getting the cup. You have to have good defense-men to clean up the rebounds and take away the 2nd chances.
-You have to have hot scorers. Good defense only gives you a shot but the biscuit has to go into the other net to win.
-Depth is important
-Multi-faceted players are key. Chara is a defense-man that can fight and still shoot from the top of the key. Thomas can make good outlet passes.
Boston hasn't looked this good since Bobby Orr!!!!

Porsche_monkey 04-19-2009 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sonic dB (Post 4614523)
Chris Osgood moves up to #4 all time in playoff shutouts, along with in the top 5 all time playoff wins and top 10 all time wins. Do the math.

Let's not forget that some of the great goalies played in an era when there were only two rounds of playoffs. Cut his shutout total in half to compare him to goalies pre-1967.

Porsche_monkey 04-19-2009 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Por_sha911 (Post 4615453)
In the playoffs
-A bad goalie will guarantee an early vacation but a great goalie does not mean getting the cup. You have to have good defense-men to clean up the rebounds and take away the 2nd chances.
-You have to have hot scorers. Good defense only gives you a shot but the biscuit has to go into the other net to win.
-Depth is important
-Multi-faceted players are key. Chara is a defense-man that can fight and still shoot from the top of the key. Thomas can make good outlet passes.
Boston hasn't looked this good since Bobby Orr!!!!

All valid points. Aside from referring to the slot as the key. ;)

You also need luck, as an injury to a key player is usually insurmountable. And you need one easy round, finish in four or five games while your next opponent plays seven.

Buckterrier 04-19-2009 03:57 PM

[QUOTE=Por_sha911;4615453]In the playoffs
-A bad goalie will guarantee an early vacation but a great goalie does not mean getting the cup. QUOTE]

Boy you got that right. What was his name for Philly, the goalie, named the MVP in the cup finals in a losing cause. Only time it's happened I believe.
Ron... it's on the tip of my tongue!!!

Rick V 04-19-2009 03:59 PM

Hextal

m21sniper 04-19-2009 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Por_sha911 (Post 4615453)
In the playoffs
-A bad goalie will guarantee an early vacation but a great goalie does not mean getting the cup. You have to have good defense-men to clean up the rebounds and take away the 2nd chances.
-You have to have hot scorers. Good defense only gives you a shot but the biscuit has to go into the other net to win.
-Depth is important
-Multi-faceted players are key. Chara is a defense-man that can fight and still shoot from the top of the key. Thomas can make good outlet passes.
Boston hasn't looked this good since Bobby Orr!!!!

I have watched RED HOT goalies completely and single handedly shut teams down in the playoffs so many times it's not even something i consider uncommon. (Any flyers fan from the Lindros era will remember the epic series the Beezer and Broduer have had against the Orange and Black)

But yes, generally speaking, all those other things are very useful to have- but they all pale in comparison to an elite top flight blue chip hot goaler.

Goaltender is, quite frankly, the single most important position in sports. Any sports.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porsche_monkey (Post 4615584)
You also need luck, as an injury to a key player is usually insurmountable. And you need one easy round, finish in four or five games while your next opponent plays seven.

Luck is the key in the form of deflections that create- and deny- goals.

Hockey is a flukey sport that is often decided solely by a totally fluke bounce.

m21sniper 04-19-2009 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckterrier (Post 4615769)

Boy you got that right. What was his name for Philly, the goalie, named the MVP in the cup finals in a losing cause. Only time it's happened I believe.
Ron... it's on the tip of my tongue!!!

Hexxxxxx-talllllllll

He really was, in many ways, a great player that totally revolutionized the position. However he also had a knack for letting in a soft goal at the exact wrong moments, ruining so many otherwise great performances it is not even funny.

https://www.msu.edu/user/zieglerj/hextall.jpg
In many ways he absolutely epitomized what it means to be a Philadelphia Flyer.

Buckterrier 04-19-2009 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick V (Post 4615771)
Hextal

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 4615781)
Hexxxxxx-talllllllll

He really was, in many ways, a great player that totally revolutionized the position. However he also had a knack for letting in a soft goal at the exact wrong moments, ruining so many otherwise great performances it is not even funny.

In many ways he absolutely epitomized what it means to be a Philadelphia Flyer.


Yup. That's it. What a shame for him. I have to agree with Sniper on the goalie discussion. In what other sport can you 'ride' a player? In Hockey you can ride a goalie to hoisting the Cup. Except for Hextal :(
And btw... Burasso's playoff save % was .902, better than his regular season %.

Porsche_monkey 04-19-2009 05:49 PM

Just to let the so-called 'experts' here know some facts:

In the ten years that the Stanley Cup was been awarded between 1996 and 2006 the goalie on the winning team had a lower playoff save percentage than the losing goalie seven out of ten years.

Only 30% of the time did the winning goalie have the better save percentage.

Barrasso's save percentage was 0.907 in 1992 (0.885 on the season) and 0.919 in 1991 (0.896 on the season). He had a 0.892 career save percentage.

A flukey sport? Someone should tell the consistently good teams (Red Wings, Devils, Sharks) that they might stop being lucky any day now.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.