+1

With a name like LubeMaster77, no way that I will even let my kids shake hand with you.

LOL

I think that you got that backward only a racist would say that they are guilty even after they were found innocent.

So what do you know that 12 other peoples in both cases didn't know? Oh they were color blind and couldn't see that the defendants were black. And we know that blacks are always guilty no matter what. Did I just walk into the Twilight Zone and got transported back to the 50's.

Speaking of unhappy kids...... What the hell man?

Playing the race card is a time-honored way to deflect a conversation from the true facts at hand. Well played sir, ever think of running for office?

If you look at ALL of the postings, you will see that Sammyg2 used the racist term first.

The following was posted on another website by someone else:

"Oh Please, you need to do your research hunny. It never stated that the boy was able to identify Michaels private area, it stated that it was inconclusive. So Sweety do better research!! If the above child was your son, you mean to tell me that if he was abused MONEY would shut u up? WOW!! It was obvious the father was after the money, he was recorded making threats about Jackson and 'getting what he wants'. He gave his son an anesthesia that causes you to halusinate all of this is FACT not opinion or FICTION! The father was asked to go to trial, bring criminal charges against Jackson, he opted for CIVIL! HMMMMMMM! What does that sound like a hurt, greving father who want justice or a MONEY HOG!! Remember Mr. Chandler needed money to fund is dream, and he did it any cost, hurting anyone in the process!!! But they have to answer to a higher power on the judgement day! I HOPE THEY R READY!! KARMA IS A MUDDA!!!!"

[QUOTE]
Posted on another website by someone else? are you serious? Is that actually supposed to mean anything to anybody? Is that the best source you can find?
Stop right now, you are really starting to embarrass yourself.

What is it about you and MJ? you seem to be taking this awfully personal. Why is that? Be honest.

Ha. Like that'll happen.

For the record, OJ was guilty as sin. 12 (or 13) idiots can't change that.

I stated my opinion that only a fool or a racist would say that OJ and MJ were not guilty.
If someone actually believes OJ was not guilty, I consider him to be a fool. If he says that OJ was not guilty because he is standing up for OJ because of his race, in my book that makes him a racist.

Deal with it.

[QUOTE=sammyg2;4766836] And where did you get your info about M.J.? If I had just pasted the quote from the other website without mentioning that it was posted by someone else that would have been Plagiarism.

O.J. is guilty as sin only to the people that don't respect the outcome of the trial. For the record, O.J. was found NOT Guilty in a court of law. If you have no respect for our system of Justice what do you have respect for? 12 people listened to both side and decided the fate for O.J..

I think that you have ALREADY EMBARRASS yourself as being a RACIST.

OJ was acquitted of the murder charges and in the eyes of the law was not guilty of criminal charges. There is no argument in that. But anyone that understands logic can not really believe he was not guilty. Guilty people are acquitted of crimes all the time because of technicalities. That is the way the legal system works. If you remember the CIVIL case he was found guilty and had to pay Ron Goldman. The good news is OJ is back where he belongs.

As to MJ it is possible he was innocent, totally weird and whacked out, but maybe innocent.

I'm the opposite of Micheal Jackson. I had more toys than every kid in my neighborhood. I had tons of Legos, practically every Star Wars toy ever made and a *****en BMX bike. Skateboarding taught me that sports that emphasize a need for expensive equipment (like BMX) aren't nearly as fun as sports that emphasize a desire to improve your own personal skill level.
That's why I drive a twenty year old 944 (sic)

Haven't a number of OJ jurors expressed regret towards voting "not guilty"? Wait, they're all probably racists too. They're everywhere!!!:rolleyes:

OJ should be damn happy that he's a black man. That was a large part of his defense. Were he white, the entire Fuhrman racist argument would have been moot.