Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/index.php)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Kate Middleton's Breasts (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=706428)

widebody911 09-17-2012 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by widgeon13 (Post 6981179)
Paparazzi are a PITA but what can be done about idiots like this using the equivalent of 1000 mm lens. Hell, can one even tell if it's her??

To capture an image of something that small, you'd need a scanning electron microscope.

masraum 09-17-2012 10:53 AM

If you're famous, and British royalty is about as famous as it gets, then you have to be conscious of everything that you do if you don't want others to see it. It's a shame, but that's just the way it is. If you're in Britain it's probably possible to have some stuff suppressed, but if you're abroad (no pun intended), then all bets are off.

I think she's very pretty, but the pictures suck and her boobs are not in the top three or maybe even top five of her assets.

URY914 09-17-2012 11:01 AM

She needs a Royal boob job.

Joeaksa 09-17-2012 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doug_porsche (Post 6981163)
Wouldn't it be funny if Kate just didn't care?

Thats the thing... almost everywhere in Europe, everyone sunbathes/swims topless... its only in the UK or America where prudes abound that anyone is concerned by it...

And for you azzwipes commenting about how small her titties are, just wait, when she is 45 they will still be nice and firm while the ladies with big boobies will be down to their waist... Will take mine smaller anyday.

Joeaksa 09-17-2012 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by URY914 (Post 6981240)
She needs a Royal boob job.

She needs NOTHING. Fine just the way she is!

slodave 09-17-2012 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 6981253)
She needs NOTHING. Fine just the way she is!

I second that! :D

Gogar 09-17-2012 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 6981253)
She needs NOTHING. Fine just the way she is!

He's right again!

HardDrive 09-17-2012 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 6981253)
She needs NOTHING. Fine just the way she is!

Exactly. She is a beautiful woman. The comments of some American louts, churls and knaves have no merit.

nostatic 09-17-2012 11:47 AM

just say no to silicone. And paparazzi.

Joeaksa 09-17-2012 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nostatic (Post 6981337)
just say no to silicone. And paparazzi.

Totally agree.

Finally found the photos on the internet....

Personally if it were shots of my wife would not have said a thing, but it is the royal family after all...

She has a very nice body and needs no changes to it other than my marrying her sister and competing the group! :)

kaisen 09-17-2012 11:59 AM

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1347908216.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1347908229.jpg



She's truly a lovely girl, and very classy in a real way.

I haven't looked for the photos, nor will I.

red-beard 09-17-2012 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VaSteve (Post 6980991)
Unimpressive.

Seriously.

The best way for her not to have this problem, is to leave her top on.

Meh. Itty bitty titty committee...Chairwoman and CEO

red-beard 09-17-2012 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 6981354)
Totally agree.

Finally found the photos on the internet....

Personally if it were shots of my wife would not have said a thing, but it is the royal family after all...

She has a very nice body and needs no changes to it other than my marrying her sister and competing the group! :)

Unfortunately, the bulge in your pants is much too small...


































You need a bigger wallet!!!

rob justice 09-17-2012 12:09 PM

Saw the photos - thought she looked great.
Pity all the hassle it's causing now lawyers are involved - but the chances of them getting privacy are nil at best.

red-beard 09-17-2012 12:11 PM

My ex-wife had smaller ones. I dated a girl with basically nipples (good sized ones!) but that was it. Who cares!?! This is really not a significant issue in the world today.

I do agree with Joe, she is very very good looking. She is also single minded and ambitious. She made the decisions that she was going to marry that boy and did EVERYTHING to make it happen. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

And She was/is realistic about what she was getting into. I expect that no matter what she will not divorce him, she will provide royal heirs and she will get to live the life of the rich and famous.

Bill Douglas 09-17-2012 12:31 PM

I would have thought the future Queen of England would have enough sense to keep her top on - for her own sake.

Me personally; yes I liked the pics as she is the sort I (used to) go after.

javadog 09-17-2012 12:31 PM

You have to wonder how her security detail allowed someone to get close enough to shoot the photos without anybody noticing they were there.

JR

Zeke 09-17-2012 12:32 PM

If I showed you pics of my mother at the same age, you'd be blown away be the similarity.

http://storage.canoe.ca/v1/dynamic_r...=1347681057441

Bill Douglas 09-17-2012 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by javadog (Post 6981428)
You have to wonder how her security detail allowed someone to get close enough to shoot the photos without anybody noticing they were there.

JR

The photog was about a mile away on a public road.

70SATMan 09-17-2012 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 6981431)
If I showed you pics of my mother at the same age, you'd be blown away be the similarity.

You have topless photos of your mother?:eek:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.