She was similar there too. No need for pics.

Jerkoff.

hey, do you have topless photos of your mother?

























do you want to buy some?

I'll be here all week. Try the veal.

Dude! IT was a joke! Got to admit, not the best choice of words given the thread.SmileWavy


By the way, I need pics to verify...:D:p

yeah, but in this case the shoe fits.

She is getting what she asked for. Her boobs are too small and poorly shaped.

she looks great

the best pic is the prince applying sunblock to her crack!!!!

I thought the Euros were too sophisticated and cosmopolitan to get worked up over pictures of bare breasts.

Interesting - as mentioned above. Only the US and English territories make a big deal about boobs. French girls walk around naked on the beach and it is thought as common. We are but such school boys.

This was in a French publication, a country with all the naked boobages: What matters are the ones we want to see, but can't. Once seen, next group.

And this is in every country on every planet with an axis, spinning, in every universe, ever, even those with nude beaches. That is why the French TOOK the picture.

Me, I'd help with the sunscreen lotion if needed, if the thing with Joe and Pippa doesn't work out.

The OP brought up the question of: Whether nude photos of celebrities should be be sold to the public without their consent?
I'd say definitely NO (but I still like to look at them).

That...umm...raises...the question of whether nude photos of anyone should be taken at all, when a situation of inherent and/or reasonable expectation of privacy exists?
Anyone with money can now purchase a UAV with a telephoto lens, fly it near a home, and take photos or video of inside a person's castle home/bedroom.

Barbara Streisand once sued the Cali Coastal Commission/Google Maps which was taking ariel photos of the coastline for scientific....um...posterity.
-However, those were taken at ~5K+ ft, and could be argued to be unspecific.
-This lawsuit brought on the "Barbara Streisand" effect, where multiple websites hosted copies of these photos out of protest.

What was it she asked for, again?

I know the royal family has been subject to invasion of privacy all along. Harry to Fergie have all had their nude exploits. And I know this time it was the future queen. But the cat's out of the bag now so I hope they just laugh it off.

Getting way too serious just sharpens the focus of all those lenses.

But if Dennis is saying that she should have just kept the top on, he's probably right.

Well, not exactly the CAT....

This is the BEST covered version!!!

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1347918611.jpg

Look at QEII's expression! Fantastic!

Diana was judged by who she was.
Kate is being judged by what she is.

Another semi-hot chick that put out for a prince.

I haven't seen the pictures but from the reviews and the covered-up ones, I'd say that it reminds me of Paul Newman's one sentence review of Robert Altman's "The Player":

"You don't get to see the tits that you do want to see and you do get to see the tits that you don't want to see. :D

Too bad for Katie that they don't have the U.S.'s strict Model Consent Form laws!

I think they're actually stricter in England.

France, not so much...

G** damn french again.

"Good breasts," Bob mused, casually lighting a cigarette, "but certainly not great breasts."

Quois??? Definitely less prudish...