|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
No idea what's going on with your camera but this kid is awesome!
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Any camera is going to have trouble with this scenario in auto mode:
![]() The subjects are in the shade and back-lit, and the sun is shining directly into the lens through the leaves. (note the lens flare above the ball holder's head). To properly expose the subjects, you would have to spot meter on the children, and live with the blown out highlights in the background. Before you condemn the camera, use the available light to your advantage, not as a troublemaker. ![]() Good luck !
__________________
max |
||
|
|
|
|
The Tweeze
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 3,744
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 136
|
The photos you're getting look exactly like stock JPEGs on Auto out of a DSLR/Mirrorless with a kit lens to me.
The difference between the LX3 and the NEX is probably that the LX3 was doing more optimization in camera. I don't have an NEX handy to check things out, but it's worth messing around with the JPEG settings in the camera and seeing what you get. Also, shoot in P instead of Auto, the camera will still do SS and Aperture automatically but it won't make other random crazy decisions without you knowing.
__________________
Mototsports photog who occasionally tries to write things. '12 Mazda2 (DD) '87 325is (Now mechanically sound, but still ratty. Still in resto/repair stages, soon moving onto upgrades. Will eventually be a tarmac rally/targa car, if all goes to plan.) Hoping to have a 911 to take to Rennsport V |
||
|
|
|
|
GAFB
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 7,842
|
Shaun is that the camera we talked about? If so sorry it is giving you trouble. I think the pics have great color saturation and the dynamic range there is pretty impressive.
Semi related note - I didn't realize you were doing your own production layout for the line sheets etc. I would suggest getting a color calibrated monitor if you haven't already (with a color thermometer etc). Well worth the money. We are using one at the studio for the high fidelity color work. Check out LaCie... |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,922
|
Quote:
Shot in 100, I think it's pretty much perfect. The Sony does color the best I've ever seen.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,922
|
Quote:
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,922
|
Quote:
![]() Good advice on the monitor, it's a nice Samsung and calibrated, as is the MacBook Pro. Both have to be as I'm working with Pantone textile color books. If what I see on the screen isn't close or exact to what's in the book, that's a problem! It's the differences between photos and camera settings on the same monitor.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
|
|
|