|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 1,032
|
I suspect you are going to want to add a horizontal bar to attach your shoulder harnesses. The guides from Schroth are helpful to understand the geometry.
https://www.schroth.com/en/segments/racing/service/installation-instructions.html |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
Finished the main body!
Only parts (doors, hood, etc) left! Photos: ![]() ![]()
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
Painted!
![]() ![]()
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
a bare clean/painted interior is so sexy... and loud
__________________
Regards, Flo / 79 SC streetrod - Frankfurt, Germany Instagram: @elvnmisfit |
||
|
|
|
|
AutoBahned
|
you like white
and say you like light so, how light is the car? |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
😂 😂 Only noticed now that everything is white around there, pure coincidence!
I didn't measured yet, but I'm assuming it will be 900kg (less than 2000lbs)
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: DE
Posts: 301
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
I actually don't know if I should replace the whole window with the normal one with a leather strap or keep this... It is not as perfect as yours is.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
Just to update
Clean engine and gearbox in
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
Does someone have any technical drawing/diagram with measures of a front fuel tank protection?
Like the one on the image below.
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 506
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
I cannot buy outside Europe, otherwise I'll pay more in taxes than the actual value of the part
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
Hello everyone!
I'm in trouble, what is what I'm doing wrong? Clearence from sway bar to strut is 0mm... What I'm doing wrong? Regards,
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) |
||
|
|
|
|
PCA Member since 1988
|
That’s because you are using coil-overs. You will have to figure it a way to bend or otherwise provide more clearance, or switch to later style anti sway bars.
__________________
1973.5 911T with RoW 1980 SC CIS stroked to 3.2, 10:1 Mahle Sport p/c's, TBC exhaust ports, M1 cams, SSI's. RSR bushings & adj spring plates, Koni Sports, 21/26mm T-bars, stock swaybars, 16x7 Fuchs w Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 205/55-16 at all 4 corners. Cars are for driving. If you want art, get something you can hang on the wall! |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
Thank you for your answer, but I see many Rsr with coils and this sway bar.
Might it be the a arms that are with a bigger angle than they should?
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) Last edited by BernardoEsteves; 06-11-2023 at 02:06 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
What does the gap look like at nominal ride height under static load?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 308
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,358
|
Quote:
Is your photo of the interference at full droop or when the car and suspension is weighted and sitting on the ground? If it's at full droop, try setting the car on the ground and rechecking the clearance...
__________________
'74 911 Red Sunroof Coupe, 3.6L, etc... '76 912 Yellow SPEC 911/911CUP |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
Picture of other following
__________________
911T 1970 - For racing purposes only 911E 1973 - For racing purposes only (on going) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,358
|
I agree that coil-overs shouldn't be the reason for interference. I think it's hard to compare pictures car-to-car without all the information... in the photo you just posted that shows plenty of clearance - have the a-arms been modified, are there offset ball joints installed, exactly what type of sway bar is installed etc... all of which could make a difference... also, the a-arms look almost level with the ground and not at full droop.
Can you cheat the sway bar arms closer to the inner fender, away from the strut tube to buy yourself a few more mm's? I will try to look at the 2 cars I have with RSR struts to see how close the sway bar hardware is to the strut tube... may take a few days, but I'll try to remember to take a look to compare. I seem to remember that it was pretty tight when the suspension is at full droop on my cars, but I don't remember anything physically touching. I think that if your car is a street or track car that will be used such that the wheels will always be in contact w/the ground and under load, I'd not worry about it too much if there is clearance when loaded. If you use the car for rallying where there are jumps involved etc..., I might be more concerned about the conflict.
__________________
'74 911 Red Sunroof Coupe, 3.6L, etc... '76 912 Yellow SPEC 911/911CUP |
||
|
|
|