|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 6
|
turbo springs/struts/shocks on non-turbo
Greetings,
I am working on getting some specs together for a suspension upgrade for my 92' C2. From looking at the Bilstein part numbers, they are the same for both turbo and non-turbo models. The H&R spring part numbers, however, are different. From what I can gather, the turbo springs are somewhat stiffer. I have driven a car (only on the street) with a similar setup, which used non-turbo springs, and definitely felt I could live with something a little more aggressive. Now, for the questions: 1) Can I use the turbo springs and will this improve performance? 2) Is there a "cost equivalent" alternative other than Bilstein/H&R that I should look at? 3) Would duplicating the European RS spec suspension be a better option and where can I find the parts necessary (and part numbers) to do this? Many thanks for any help you can offer!
__________________
Alan Lott Auburn University 92' C2 |
||
|
|
|
|
PRO Motorsports
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 4,580
|
If you plan on tracking the car, I'd go with Eibach's.
The H&R's are progressive, which is a great compromise for the street. Gives you a nice ride. But for the track, you really don't want progressive. You want them stiff right now.
__________________
'69 911E coupe' RSR clone-in-progress (retired 911-Spec racer) '72 911T Targa MFI 2.4E spec(Formerly "Scruffy") 2004 GT3 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 6
|
springs
thanks for the help, tyson. i do appreciate the feedback.
__________________
Alan Lott Auburn University 92' C2 |
||
|
|
|