|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 67
|
Early 911 (ROW) value
What is the general consensus of how the ROW early 911s compare in value to a US-spec version?
Interested in the 72-73 T's that had different fuel delivery systems (carbs vs. MFI/CIS). I have seen a few worth looking at but didnt know how the values compared. |
||
01-05-2008, 04:00 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 1,342
|
Any early 911 with a complete/original fuel injection system is worth considerably more than a carb'd engine, factory stock or otherwise. Plus, the carb'd 911 will be slower. The ROW 2.4 T engine produced 130 HP while the fuel injected version produced 140.
__________________
Sandy 1969 911E 1970 240Z |
||
|
01-05-2008, 09:13 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon Line
Posts: 3,722
|
The first CIS was in the 1973.5T. Their have been many discussions on the difference be it pro or con between the MFI versus CIS versus Carbs on the board. I have the CIS and am pleased with the overall performance, but then just about every component was replaced! I have heard that the MFI is difficult and expensvie to rebuild. The fuel system in early 911's, I feel does not necessarily dictate the price of the cars as your looking at longhood vehicles that are at least 34.5 years old as in the last longhood model, the 73.5T. Either way an MFI, CIS or carb model will provide excellence performance.
Bob 1973.5T Sepia of course 
|
||
|
01-08-2008, 12:39 PM
|
|
