|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Centralia, WA
Posts: 63
|
authentic 10K tach? or replica?
Anyone able to shed some light on this for me? As far as what it exactley is and what the value looks like.
it has numbers both at the top and bottom (interior sides of glass) camera was blurring it up badley 901 741 302 06 top 0011 bottom Thanks,  
|
||
08-21-2010, 03:53 PM
|
|
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,522
|
I can't read it in the picture, but under the "225" is a month and year of manufacture. Is it readable?
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
|
08-22-2010, 08:13 AM
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Centralia, WA
Posts: 63
|
It appears to say
12 46 or 12/16 Very hard to read |
||
|
08-22-2010, 11:52 AM
|
|
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,522
|
It's got to either be 66, 76, or 86.
But the part number is correct. The thing that I don't know about is the redline. See the picture of a known original one here: 10,000 rpm Tachometer, p/n 901.741.302.06 as used on the 1967 Porsche 911R - Photo 3 photo - 914-6 GT photos at pbase.com But then here's one that was sold here without redline: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-used-parts-sale-wanted/365467-fs-10k-911-tach-901-741-302-06-a.html
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
|
08-23-2010, 05:01 AM
|
|
