![]() |
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Wet Side
Posts: 5,675
|
With the head stud, I'm down to $40k, tops. |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
Quote:
1) RoW = no catalytic converter 2) RoW K-Jetronic fuel head is non-Lambda assisted, so delivers a better air/fuel ratio versus the lambda fuel head (US emissions requirement) and computer system . . . injector lines are larger diameter (presumably to flow more fuel). 3) No exhaust air injection system on RoW (drive for it is from the left cam - robs a slight bit of power) or other emissions components that add weight and complexity . . . better distributor advance settings on RoW as they did not use ignition timing to get heat into the cat. - Interesting points about the two fuel heads - the lambda fuel head has been proven to be capable of flowing more fuel than the RoW fuel head after modification to both (even without changing the injector lines) . . . the RoW fuel head is cast steel (lambda is aluminum) and has much bigger problems with corrosion both inside and out and it also has an all steel, primary diaphragm that gets damaged more easily from fuel pressure spikes (dents in the diaphragm). The RoW Turbos were rated at slightly higher crank HP, primarily due to the absence of the cat, but the Lambda fuel head on US models is actually a better tuning/modification platform. P.S. for Eric (in case you are wondering if I missed yer hilarious "Liliputin" comment a couple of days ago) = ![]() Last edited by Ronnie's.930; 04-14-2014 at 06:17 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Gray Market, funky German body interior color combo, no Fuchs, immediate top end repair and reseal, probable tranny syncros, body work and windshield. Probable inaccurate mileage. Needs everything, $30 tops in this very up 930 market.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Unlike alot of people It being a grey market euro is much more desirable to me than a US car.
__________________
1984 930 3.3 Turbo 2004 BMW X5 4.4i 1983 BMW 320i 1993 Vaz 21063 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
And the car is SOLD!! oh man ill miss it now
![]()
__________________
1984 930 3.3 Turbo 2004 BMW X5 4.4i 1983 BMW 320i 1993 Vaz 21063 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 884
|
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
|||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Wet Side
Posts: 5,675
|
Quote:
If I could get rid of mine, I would in a heartbeat. |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
|||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Wet Side
Posts: 5,675
|
|||
![]() |
|
Team California
|
A sunroof is a bunch of added weight in the worst possible place, up high. Non-sunroof 911s are very desirable to serious enthusiasts as well as people with headroom issues. On even an occasional track car, the extra headroom is helmet room.
__________________
Denis "Pete Hegseth is not really an alcoholic, he was investigating drunk drivers at bars for the FBI." -Speaker Mike Johnson |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
What did it actually sell for given the $30k - $65K opinion range ....?
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
|||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
Quote:
Sweeping BS generalizations, such as yours above, are always good for a chuckle, so thanks! ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I ended up trading it straight up for something else. At least now i know itll get that engine rebuild it deserves ![]()
__________________
1984 930 3.3 Turbo 2004 BMW X5 4.4i 1983 BMW 320i 1993 Vaz 21063 |
||
![]() |
|
Team California
|
Quote:
But just because we like them, does not mean that non-sunroof cars are very desirable to serious enthusiasts. If you're not aware of this and think that it's "a sweeping BS generalization", then you're just ignorant about the subject. But you raced MCs and you like your sunroof, so there is that. Where did you guys over here come from, anyways? Chuckles indeed. ![]() Last edited by speeder; 04-27-2014 at 12:40 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
Quote:
Other than the extra tall folks that want to drive/race a 911, the primary reason I've seen given for the non-sunroof appeal is the fact that so few were produced this way (as in 'rare') . . . so if you are saying that they are appealing to people that are seriously enthusiastic about a not-so-common 911 roof option, or people that are enthusiast participants in vintage 911 racing, well I'll give you that, but that is an extremely limited group. But if you are saying that they are extra desirable to seriously enthusiastic 911 owners in general, well that is indeed a nonsense, BS generalization. As far as where I came from; spat forth from my mother's womb in 1968. ![]() Last edited by Ronnie's.930; 04-27-2014 at 12:49 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,383
|
1968
![]() I could never imagine being THAT old |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
Didn't yer mama teach you to respect yer elders, sonny boy?! Watch out, or I might have to b*tch slap you with my cane!!!
![]() Come to think of it, your car choice, noted in that other thread, is well deserving of a b*tch slap - get ready to duck and cover! ![]() Last edited by Ronnie's.930; 04-27-2014 at 01:55 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Team California
|
People who are hard core performance types like them because they are lighter. That's all. I think it's kind of insignificant myself.
|
||
![]() |
|