![]() |
|
|
|
Registered User
|
911E - where does it really stand?
So having a '69 911E I have a vested interest in this, but not really looking for valuations as much as understanding where people feel the "E" fits in relative to the "T" and "S".
There was an interesting post a while back about all of the things an "E" owner would love to have known prior to buying as there are some idiosyncrasies such as the no longer available hydro-pneumatic suspension, etc, so they are a little quirky. For me it was always the drivability compared to an "S" (they are fantastic to drive and the sound of those early engines is reason enough them drive them hard) and relative exclusivity compared to the "T", but I get the feeling it's still a the misunderstood middle child. Anyone got any thoughts on where the "E" will ultimately stand among the legacy of the early Porsches? |
||
![]() |
|
Home of the Whopper
|
In some cases, less Es were made than Ts and Ss, an E is quicker than a T or an S, and is much easier to drive than an S. But for some reason everybody thinks more HP is better.
__________________
1968 912 coupe 1971 911E Targa rustbucket 1972 914 1.7 1987 924S |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 196
|
Here's an old article from '72 describing the differences of that years cars. May not relate to the '68 cars, but a good read none the less.
1972 Porsche 911 T Coupe vs. 911 E Targa, 911 S Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Home of the Whopper
|
Interesting article.
$46 upgrade for each sport seat? ![]()
__________________
1968 912 coupe 1971 911E Targa rustbucket 1972 914 1.7 1987 924S |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 4,240
|
We just sold a largely identical pair of cars, one a 1970 911E, the other a 1970 911S. Both were originally silver. Both had VERY original interiors in excellent condition. Both needed serious rust repair in the same places. Both were matching numbers cars. The 911E sold for $50k and the 911S brought $77k. That's pretty indicative of where the gap in values still lies. Pretty significant. -- Matt
__________________
http://www.unobtanium-inc.com 356 Registry 17369 Early 911S Registry 912 Registry, PCA |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Yep - no doubt about where the 911E is relative to the 911S, just wondering whether the 911E will in time separate itself from the 911T as it seems like a top 911T is valued similarly to an top 911E. Also curious whether anyone values the later models more than the earlier models?
Rob |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered User
|
Interesting that Car & Driver liked the T the best.
__________________
07 Boxster 88 Carrera Cabriolet 3.2 (sold) 05 Boxster S (sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Based on pricing differential to a T, I think the E is usually a bargain. I keep wondering if the market is going to catch on. IMO, E cars should be priced at 80% of Ss. But that's just my opinion.
__________________
techweenie | techweenie.com Marketing Consultant (expensive!) 1969 coupe hot rod 2016 Tesla Model S dd/parts fetcher |
||
![]() |
|