Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/index.php)
-   Porsche Marketplace Discussion (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/forumdisplay.php?f=268)
-   -   Intro and Question about '89 911 have my eye on (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=944514)

Ski 02-01-2017 05:47 PM

Intro and Question about '89 911 have my eye on
 
Hey all!

Glad to be part of this great forum. Even after only 7 or so days being a member and reading postings, I know so much more than I did, yet now realize how much more there is to learn.

I recently decided to officially and for the first time get into the 911 market. I want an 80's model, preferably 87-89. I've found one that seems to fit the bill:
89 Targa
Well cared for
50K miles
below rust belt all its life
$49K --- Is this right priced? What should I offer?

I just asked for maintenance records as the above is all I know about the car right now. In spite of the low miles and condition, I expect there is still plenty to be aware of and look for? Are the 87s known to have specific issues?

If the records check out and I don't hear of many red flags from you, I'll get a PPI.

Lastly, I'll apologize ahead of time for the many noob questions/mistakes I'm sure to make... :)

Thanks!

Trakrat 02-01-2017 06:21 PM

so you don't know the colors or options the car has?

Jack Stands 02-01-2017 06:25 PM

Welcome to the jungle! The 80s 911 Carreras are great cars, and the 89 would have all the goodies with the G50 transmission. Personally, I love the Targas for the open air motoring and great visibility.

Check the Hagerty.com website for current values, but be honest on condition. I purchased an '84 Targa with 134,000 miles a couple of years ago for less than $15,000, and after a new clutch and synchro, it's been a great ride. Now just have to wait for spring!

betterair 02-01-2017 06:26 PM

No apology necessary,we all started somewhere just like you.
Seems like you have a direction in mind ,the 87-89 3.2 ,G50 trans cars are a solid bet.Make sure you want to live with the pro's and cons of a targa ,see what others are selling for, and take the plunge. 49 K is high IMO.But the marque is in demand now,so owners getting out for the cash will want a big pile of it.
Also might want to post in the Marketplace forum-lotsa feedback on the Market over there

Jack Stands 02-01-2017 06:34 PM

Hagerty gives an average value of $43,000, though an absolute perfect concour one could go as high as $81,000.

Ski 02-01-2017 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trakrat (Post 9456928)
so you don't know the colors or options the car has?

Stock, save for the modern AM/FM/CD stereo installed.
From factory with cruise, short shift lever, and hi-fi.

Paint: linen gray metallic with linen leather. Can't say I like interior color all that much, but exterior I believe looks great.

That's it for options listing.

Thanks!

Ski 02-01-2017 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Stands (Post 9456943)
Hagerty gives an average value of $43,000, though an absolute perfect concour one could go as high as $81,000.

Got it. Thanks!

Will do some digging on various valuation sites. Should have done that first...

Ski 02-01-2017 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Stands (Post 9456934)
Welcome to the jungle! The 80s 911 Carreras are great cars, and the 89 would have all the goodies with the G50 transmission. Personally, I love the Targas for the open air motoring and great visibility.

Check the Hagerty.com website for current values, but be honest on condition. I purchased an '84 Targa with 134,000 miles a couple of years ago for less than $15,000, and after a new clutch and synchro, it's been a great ride. Now just have to wait for spring!

I've always loved the Targas even though Coupes offer more rigidity and cleaner lines.

I've been looking at 84s as well. A buddy threw a white one my way today with 85K on it for 38,900. Going to dig a bit deeper into the details on that one, too.

Spring can't come soon enough!

NYNick 02-02-2017 05:10 AM

Understand that 87 has a 3.2 and a G50 transmission, one of the most highly regarded combos in the line. I think your color combo sounds unique and cool....can't quite picture the color though. Not a Targa fan myself, but that's me.

50K miles is outrageously low, so I guess that's why he's asking $49K, a pretty high price. But look; if you go the distance getting this car checked out with a PPI top to bottom; if there is a traceable history of ownership and no accidents; if the gaps are perfect; if the maintenance records are a mile long by reputable Porsche shops and the car NEEDS NOTHING and if it's original paint, you MAY be able to justify the price.

Still, it's a bit high IMO.

Good luck.

Christien 02-02-2017 05:55 AM

Just to confirm, is it an 87 or 89? You mentioned 89 twice and 87 once ;)

For reference sake, I bought my 87 cabrio last year with 37k miles and a fresh top end for 45, plus I spent another $3k following PPI for new ARP head studs while the engine was open for the top end, and a bunch of little stuff. I think I got a good price, but not a steal.

SalParadise 02-02-2017 06:31 AM

Take your time, read as much stuff as you can (especially here), get Wayne's book before taking the plunge. There is an incredible amount of combined knowledge on this site - and people who walk the walk - not just talk the talk.

This is the 'Christmas Eve' feeling of getting into 911s that you have right now. Make it last...

911 sc 02-02-2017 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9456961)
Stock, save for the modern AM/FM/CD stereo installed.
From factory with cruise, short shift lever, and hi-fi.

Paint: linen gray metallic with linen leather. Can't say I like interior color all that much, but exterior I believe looks great.

That's it for options listing.

Thanks!

Is this the car ?
Looks nice has to be fairly rare color combo

Used 1989 Porsche 911 Targa for Sale in Atlanta GA 30306 Motorcar Studio

sugarwood 02-02-2017 12:56 PM

I think there is an unwritten rule here that you don't post a link to a car someone is considering.
Sure, it's public info, but you're not helping the brother out

specialtyoneinc 02-02-2017 01:21 PM

That car looks nice from the photos. Color is pretty rare. I think you're in good shape in the mid $40k range.... That is if the paint is original, no accidents, you can verify the mileage with maintenance records, and most importantly the engine is healthy.

You are paying a premium due to the low mileage. Keep in mind, that does not necessarily mean the car is nicer than a pampered documented 100k example. A thorough PPI through a independent air-cooled specialist (not recommended from the dealer) should tell you everything you need to know. Prepare to spend around $350-$450 to get a decent PPI with leak down numbers etc...

Ski 02-02-2017 05:43 PM

Thanks for all the info. Much appreciated!

Turns out a few more have popped into view particularly an 87 Blue Targa with 83K miles which belongs to a neighbor of one of my "Porsche Coaches" :). Going to see it tomorrow. Coach says that neighbor was able to purchase from widow for $15K and then he put 25K more into it. From pics I've seen so far, everything looks tidy and the paint job is pristine.

As for the linen '89 I referenced above, I'm going to keep it in mind, but going to keep reading and looking as well, to, as SalParadise says, keep that "Christmas Eve" feeling for a bit. Especially because the interior linen color is one I'm not sure I can get used to...

Thanks again, all. Would like to share the details of the 87 blue Targa as well as an 88 that sounds great, too.

Ski 02-02-2017 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYNick (Post 9457204)
Understand that 87 has a 3.2 and a G50 transmission, one of the most highly regarded combos in the line. I think your color combo sounds unique and cool....can't quite picture the color though. Not a Targa fan myself, but that's me.

50K miles is outrageously low, so I guess that's why he's asking $49K, a pretty high price. But look; if you go the distance getting this car checked out with a PPI top to bottom; if there is a traceable history of ownership and no accidents; if the gaps are perfect; if the maintenance records are a mile long by reputable Porsche shops and the car NEEDS NOTHING and if it's original paint, you MAY be able to justify the price.

Still, it's a bit high IMO.

Good luck.

Really appreciate the thorough, yet concise, checklist - especially callouts on gaps and NEEDS NOTHING.

Thanks!

Ski 02-02-2017 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christien (Post 9457240)
Just to confirm, is it an 87 or 89? You mentioned 89 twice and 87 once ;)

For reference sake, I bought my 87 cabrio last year with 37k miles and a fresh top end for 45, plus I spent another $3k following PPI for new ARP head studs while the engine was open for the top end, and a bunch of little stuff. I think I got a good price, but not a steal.

Appreciate the comparison info. Crazy that you were able to get one with only 37K miles, and then for good price of 45. Interesting that the head studs needed work? I thought the head stud issue was more a concern on the 3.0L, so another lesson learned as I'm looking.

Thanks!!

COLB 02-06-2017 03:53 PM

I wouldn't pay a premium for low mileage on a car I intend to drive.

IMO, if you want a car to drive rather than sit in a collection -- shoot for a car with 100-150k that has had a top end rebuild, and look in the $30s.

Christien 02-06-2017 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9458365)
Appreciate the comparison info. Crazy that you were able to get one with only 37K miles, and then for good price of 45. Interesting that the head studs needed work? I thought the head stud issue was more a concern on the 3.0L, so another lesson learned as I'm looking.

Thanks!!

The head studs weren't an issue, I had them upgraded to ARPs while the engine was apart. The issue was that one of the valve guides was in bad shape, leading to poor compression on that cylinder. Apparently the oil can corrode the brass if the engine sits for a long time. So having a 30-year-old car with only 37k miles isn't necessarily all good.

Rawknees'Turbo 02-06-2017 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9458365)
Interesting that the head studs needed work? I thought the head stud issue was more a concern on the 3.0L, so another lesson learned as I'm looking.

Thanks!!

This ^^^ is not accurate - all of the 911/911 Turbo engines (other than the 993TT) with dilivar studs are very susceptible to head stud breakage (not just the 3.0 engines).

Dilivar is a ridiculously delicate, basically garbage alloy that begins to fracture at the slightest hint of corrosion - hard to understand why Porsche insisted on using it for so long despite tremendous evidence of failure.

PS - don't fall for the "engine x,y, or z is bulletproof" bullshart that is so common to hear/read - total malarkey!

Ski 02-06-2017 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rawknees'Turbo (Post 9463223)
This ^^^ is not accurate - all of the 911/911 Turbo engines (other than the 993TT) with dilivar studs are very susceptible to head stud breakage (not just the 3.0 engines).

Dilivar is a ridiculously delicate, basically garbage alloy that begins to fracture at the slightest hint of corrosion - hard to understand why Porsche insisted on using it for so long despite tremendous evidence of failure.

PS - don't fall for the "engine x,y, or z is bulletproof" bullshart that is so common to hear/read - total malarkey!

Just also read a few "what to look for" articles authored by Wayne and one of them was all about the studs and Dilivar, and to your point, how its use spans across SO many models. Getting Yellow Highlight in my buying checklist!!

Ski 02-06-2017 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christien (Post 9463177)
The head studs weren't an issue, I had them upgraded to ARPs while the engine was apart. The issue was that one of the valve guides was in bad shape, leading to poor compression on that cylinder. Apparently the oil can corrode the brass if the engine sits for a long time. So having a 30-year-old car with only 37k miles isn't necessarily all good.

Did that issue show up in the PPI? If not, is there a tiering of PPIs offered where one can pay to have them look "deeper" into the engine? Then again, it's a matter of with such low miles, would one want to potentially waste the dough on a more thorough PPI when a 37K mile car shouldn't have such probs?

Rawknees'Turbo 02-06-2017 06:33 PM

^^^

Excellent highlight action for sure! One good thing about the headstuds is that it's easy for a shop to verify that they are not broken, or pulled, by simply removing the rocker covers during a PPI inspection - the tops of the studs, along with the nuts (:eek:) are very visible, and anyone with experience would be able to tell you right away if there were any that were a cause for concern. That really is a "must do" as a broken stud is very expensive to fix and should affect the sale price tremendously.

Ski 02-06-2017 06:40 PM

I mentioned I'm also looking at an 86 Targa with around 109K miles for 42.5K. Seller purchased from widow for 15K and then put 20K into exterior glass out respray, etc. I'm going to see it this Saturday. He's second owner and hasn't driven but for a few hundred after work was done. Is 20K simply a crazy good exterior refresh or is that typical? Also, has full papers from all services done by one porsche shop. I should have pics tomorrow and will share.

Seller shared: We had new clutch installed 5/16. New michellin pilots, new Porsche targa top, 20,000 complete exterior cosmetic restoration from Porsche certified shop.

Christien 02-06-2017 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9463248)
Did that issue show up in the PPI? If not, is there a tiering of PPIs offered where one can pay to have them look "deeper" into the engine? Then again, it's a matter of with such low miles, would one want to potentially waste the dough on a more thorough PPI when a 37K mile car shouldn't have such probs?

Yes, you always want to have a full PPI done on a 25+ year old car. No exceptions. To do otherwise would be a very expensive gamble. Doesn't matter if it has 37k miles, 3k miles or 300k miles. It's well worth the money. I've said it before and I'll say it again - I've probably spent over $2000 on failed PPIs in the last 10 or so years but I'll bet that's saved me 10 times that in repair bills.

The valve guide issue was discovered during the PPI when I had a compression and leakdown test done. Each shop would probably have a different list of items to check on a PPI, but I always make sure they do a compression and leakdown test to gauge the health of the engine. Doing so will also turn up any broken head studs. In my opinion you should have those tests done on any air-cooled engine (not that they're any more or less susceptible to problems, but it's more of an age/mileage thing - compression/leakdown aren't likely to be a problem on a 5-year-old car). You should also ask to look for evidence of undisclosed accident damage. This can be found both with a paint meter (differing paint depths on different panels) and by looking for repair work underneath (could be welds, bent and straightened pieces, etc).

If it's costing you $100, the mechanic isn't going deep enough. It should run about $200-400, depending on the shop. Usually at least $300 including compression/leakdown.

If the compression test shows one or more bad cylinders (beyond the acceptable figures based on age and mileage), going deeper than that involves removing the engine and getting in a lot deeper, which means more money. At that point you should be either negotiating with the seller to lower the price or moving on to another car. When I bought my 87, I PPI'd another car that had a bad compression test. The seller wasn't willing to lower the price to where I was comfortable taking a risk on a motor that might need a full rebuild, so I passed and moved on. With the car I bought, we negotiated the top-end rebuild into the sale price that was (if I remember correctly) slightly higher than his original asking price, after I'd negotiated it down a bit (or maybe it was the same as the asking price). He paid the bill for the rebuild and I paid for the headstud replacement as well as some regular little stuff that turned up on the PPI. I had the headstuds upgraded "while you're in there", just as insurance against future problems. In the end we were both happy with the price.

sugarwood 02-07-2017 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9463257)
I mentioned I'm also looking at an 86 Targa with around 109K miles for 42.5K. Seller purchased from widow for 15K and then put 20K into exterior glass out respray, etc. I'm going to see it this Saturday. He's second owner and hasn't driven but for a few hundred after work was done. Is 20K simply a crazy good exterior refresh or is that typical? Also, has full papers from all services done by one porsche shop. I should have pics tomorrow and will share.

Seller shared: We had new clutch installed 5/16. New michellin pilots, new Porsche targa top, 20,000 complete exterior cosmetic restoration from Porsche certified shop.

$20k glass out? Ask him to take a photo of the receipt.

Most flippers lie about what they've invested in the car, to make their profits look smaller.
Remember, they're just a nice guy helping you make a deal, and taking a few bucks for themselves.

mibi 02-07-2017 03:54 AM

i just sold a very nice 87 targa with 77K miles for 44K. probably could have sold it a bit higher to a fellow in germany who was interested . definitely do a leak down and compression-- low mileage cars often suffer here.

Ski 02-14-2017 03:48 PM

Hey all

Took a look at the 86 Iris Blue Targa with 109K mi, and talked with the owner a fair amount. As mentioned above, the exterior was brought to the metal, repainted, seals replaced and targa completely refurbed. The new information shared is that included with the repainting was metal work on both rocker panels to eliminate rust.

In talking with a local shop specializing in "torsion bar and air cooled" Porsches, he said for starters the asking price of 42.5K was high and couldn't be justified without having engine and tranny, and perhaps even some suspension work already done. Additionally he shared the most concerning detail for him is the rust in the rocker panels. Said he seldom sees that type of work required unless there was a collision and/or significant rust involved. Suggested I think long and hard, making sure I'm exercising my patience muscles!

Thoughts?

Again, thanks for all your input and teachings!

Forgot to mention he said 1 or 2 cylinders had lost "some" compression, which for the shop was also a red flag. Then rotors and pads are needed 1K in parts, front seats need redying/touch up for 150/each, and eventually carpeting.

sugarwood 02-15-2017 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9463257)
I mentioned I'm also looking at an 86 Targa with around 109K miles for 42.5K.

I should have pics tomorrow and will share.

Pics?

Ski 02-15-2017 05:28 PM

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1487212044.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1487212044.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1487212044.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1487212044.jpg

Ski 02-16-2017 07:53 AM

Just spoke with seller-for-owner of 89 Targa with 59K mi and selling for 49K. Said lead down/compression test showed 5 cylinders at 180, but one at 140. From all I've read, having the one cylinder at different level is not good. How bad is the fact it's inconsistent and by that much?

Said current owner drove last 15K miles as daily driver whereas prior owner had as part of collection so it sat quite a bit. Also, said he doesn't see smoke and pulls strong...

Finally, I'm thinking it would make sense to have a Pelican check it out before I ask for PPI. What's the process to see if someone in Atlanta area can help? Do I simply create a new post/thread asking for the help?

Thanks!

specialtyoneinc 02-16-2017 09:24 AM

What are the leak down % numbers? If they are all lower than 10% (preferably between 2-5%) the engine is healthy most likely. I wouldn't worry about the 180 compression too much.

Ski 02-17-2017 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by specialtyoneinc (Post 9476222)
What are the leak down % numbers? If they are all lower than 10% (preferably between 2-5%) the engine is healthy most likely. I wouldn't worry about the 180 compression too much.


I'll see if I can get that metric. I got the sense I wasn't getting the right numbers when he shared "180s" and "140", but no matter the exact numbers, I was and am concerned about the difference in one cylinder.

Good call on asking for the actual numbers and more importantly, the %.

Thanks!

911 sc 02-17-2017 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9477494)
I'll see if I can get that metric. I got the sense I wasn't getting the right numbers when he shared "180s" and "140", but no matter the exact numbers, I was and am concerned about the difference in one cylinder.

Good call on asking for the actual numbers and more importantly, the %.

Thanks!

He's asking for the leak down not compression two different test.

We need both test results, the exact numbers. It will help us determine the condition of the engine.

Ski 02-17-2017 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 911 sc (Post 9478126)
He's asking for the leak down not compression two different test.

We need both test results, the exact numbers. It will help us determine the condition of the engine.

Got it. Will get those.

Thanks for clarification......and patience. :)

Rawknees'Turbo 02-17-2017 06:10 PM

Ski, if the cylinder that showed the lowest compression number also showed a troubling leakage percentage, then that would be something to be concerned about.

Also, ask the tech if he was able to determine the source of the compression leakage (past rings = hissing sound in the oil tank, past intake valve = hissing in the intake, past exhaust valve = hissing from tailpipe . . . or was it leakage from between a cylinder head and cylinder = broken or pulled headstud).

cellison 02-18-2017 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9476096)
Just spoke with seller-for-owner of 89 Targa with 59K mi and selling for 49K. Said lead down/compression test showed 5 cylinders at 180, but one at 140. From all I've read, having the one cylinder at different level is not good. How bad is the fact it's inconsistent and by that much?

Said current owner drove last 15K miles as daily driver whereas prior owner had as part of collection so it sat quite a bit. Also, said he doesn't see smoke and pulls strong...

Finally, I'm thinking it would make sense to have a Pelican check it out before I ask for PPI. What's the process to see if someone in Atlanta area can help? Do I simply create a new post/thread asking for the help?

Thanks!

is it the car at Motor Car Studio? i may be able to get over there this coming week.i talked to them about a year ago on consigning my 930 when i was fishing but may be getting more serious on selling it.

Ski 02-18-2017 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cellison (Post 9478611)
is it the car at Motor Car Studio? i may be able to get over there this coming week.i talked to them about a year ago on consigning my 930 when i was fishing but may be getting more serious on selling it.

Yep, that's the one. Would you mind checking it out? He seems a bit hesitant to share the compression test numbers and didn't offer the leak %'s, so concerned about that a bit. Less concerning is that he mentioned the top has a "minor leak" driver's side. Said when it was out in rain......that when he next got in it, noticed damp carpeting.

Would greatly appreciate getting your perspective!

Thanks,
Kevin

Ski 02-18-2017 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rawknees'Turbo (Post 9478321)
Ski, if the cylinder that showed the lowest compression number also showed a troubling leakage percentage, then that would be something to be concerned about.

Also, ask the tech if he was able to determine the source of the compression leakage (past rings = hissing sound in the oil tank, past intake valve = hissing in the intake, past exhaust valve = hissing from tailpipe . . . or was it leakage from between a cylinder head and cylinder = broken or pulled headstud).


Will do. I'll even sound like I know what I'm talking about! :)

911 sc 02-18-2017 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ski (Post 9478676)
Yep, that's the one. Would you mind checking it out? He seems a bit hesitant to share the compression test numbers and didn't offer the leak %'s, so concerned about that a bit. Less concerning is that he mentioned the top has a "minor leak" driver's side. Said when it was out in rain......that when he next got in it, noticed damp carpeting.

Would greatly appreciate getting your perspective!

Thanks,
Kevin

Definitely be concerned have a third party do a ppi . DO NOT TRUST HIS NUMBERS!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.