![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
NEW modus operandi for COA's
I recently got this email reply upon mailing in a COA request.
"We will not list the original engine/transmission on the COA unless they are provided to us by you. We do not release the engine/transmission information any longer for the security of owners due to the value of classic vehicles. This is for your security and the security of future buyers, we do not wish to provide information that may lead to any misrepresentation of a vehicle in the future. If you do not provide the engine/transmission number then the COA will only list 'Not Confirmed' where the engine/transmission number should be." I think I get it but what a pain in the butt. Essentially now once an original engine and trans are lost or separated from a car assuming that there isn't a COA previously done, there will be no real way to ever figure out and reunite them. I have successfully tracked down at least one engine based on the information on the COA. What do you guys think the PRO's and CON's will be with this new policy? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: LAX
Posts: 903
|
Just proves how worthless that piece of paper you have all been paying $100 for is. Thank god I never did. You can go to a porsche parts department and get the same info for free. Some nice one's will even let you take a pic of their screens.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: On The Road
Posts: 2,285
|
Who cares. They were never right anyway. My COA is a disaster. It doesn't even have the right engine number - and I know mine is original.
They are so flawed - it's been a shot in the dark anyway. If you've got nothing to hide then you can send in your numbers and see if it's the right one - to them. But take the weight of a COA with a grain of salt. They may be right - and maybe wrong. Guarantee if people want to make a fake COA they are going to do so. Now they will for sure. I mean, if you're in the market for a '72 S coupe, and it's very, very clean and it matters a lot because you are paying top $$$ - then I would call them by phone and bounce the numbers off them. |
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,518
|
If it's an interesting old one get a cardex if you really need to know. Otherwise just give them what's in it now and see if it matches.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Parts department can tell you what the original engine and trans serial number are on any given VIN? You sure?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
War Vet
|
I called them, faxed a copy of my title and they called me back with the correct engine and trans # for my 69 E. This was about three years ago.
MattR
__________________
Dr. Phatt |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
|||
![]() |
|
Functionista
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: CO
Posts: 7,717
|
You used to be able to tell them what you wanted listed!
They viewed it as a "correction." So yeah not worth the trouble.
__________________
Jeff 74 911, #3 I do not disbelieve in anything. I start from the premise that everything is true until proved false. Everything is possible. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 4,240
|
I've always found the COA program lacking because of all the error's people used to get, I've much preferred to pull a Kardex. I just recently had a car that the COA disappointed for an entirely new reason. The guy I bought the car from said the current motor was installed by the Factory, or so he thought. The car was a 60 Cabriolet Super 90 that had a 64 SC motor in it, I silently rolled my eyes when he told me this, everyone wants to believe the Factory did something to their car, or Ferry had lunch in it, etc. The car came with a COA, which mentioned the original Super 90 motor but no mention of the SC motor. I pulled a Kardex to double check and wouldn't you know it, in June 64 the Factory installed the current SC motor! I'll be damned. I would think this would be pretty interesting info to put on a COA, but there was no mention. Had I not had Kardex access this truly would have been a fact lost to the new owner. Now it's a cool car with real engine history and Factory provenance. So the already flawed COA system just got even more flawed. Like the one or so cars a year that I'm able to reunite every year with their original motors, people won't have access to this info anymore so they can't even search for their original motor.
Here is one such example. https://unobtaniuminc.wordpress.com/2009/07/13/reunited-and-it-feels-so-good/ A sad day for the community. ---Adam ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
http://www.unobtanium-inc.com 356 Registry 17369 Early 911S Registry 912 Registry, PCA |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I had requested a CoA for a 912E that I have. The first one came in with the year listed as a 1975 model. I called Porsche and brought this to their attention. They then issued me the exact same CoA
with the year listed correctly as a 1976. It seems that someone reads the Cardex and then manually enters the info for the CoA. Lots of room for human error. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: On The Road
Posts: 2,285
|
Guarantee Porsche NA stopped providing the engine and trans numbers because they have been sued and are being sued by people who spent serious money on something and found out that the COA was in fact worthless. These kind of things only happen when lawyers get involved and people hire them (usually rich people) to get money back, because someone got screwed.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,518
|
Lawsuits don't require being guilty of anything to be expensive and tedious. Even a win can be a financial loss if many $$$ were spent defending that you are right.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: On The Road
Posts: 2,285
|
Anyone can be held liable for anything. That's what law is based on.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lawrenceville GA 30045
Posts: 7,376
|
I don't understand the wording from PCNA on the original posting.
If I give PNA an Eng/Trans number from my '83 - or I make it up and put a replacement Eng/Trans number on the request - they will show them on the COA? or will they confirm that the info is correct and show it - or if not correct - leave it blank?
__________________
Mark '83 SC Targa - since 5/5/2001 '06 911 S Aerokit - from 5/2/2016 to 11/14/2018 '11 911 S w/PDK - from 7/2/2021 to ??? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Well, that's a revoltin' turn of events.
Kardex system ended in 1970. Subsequent number-matching (and of course Kardex retrieval) takes spies and bribery and PAG has been cracking down on that. I used to be able to get chassis numbers from engine numbers, but in the last year, that has gotten extremely expensive and troublesome. Henceforth, all "numbers matching" claims will be suspect.
__________________
techweenie | techweenie.com Marketing Consultant (expensive!) 1969 coupe hot rod 2016 Tesla Model S dd/parts fetcher |
||
![]() |
|