|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: amelia ohio 45102
Posts: 1
|
why would i want to install a K&N intake instead of the stock intake on my 2001 carrera ?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Earth.............
Posts: 2,908
|
Most wouldn't; questionable power claims, poorer filtration, and potential for MAF fouling yield a "lose-lose" scenario. When he race teams use a stock type paper filter, you have to ask yourself "Why bother?"..............
__________________
Accrochez-vous bien de vos rêves..........." |
||
|
|
|
|
NYC
|
I would not use K+N filters. You could go to links explaining why there bad however I can tell you first hand that it will pass to much dirt through your filter over time.And if you continue to use it will result in faster engine wear and very dirty contaminated oil in much less of mileage span. The stock filter is fine.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 380
|
Stick to the OEM filter.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 214
|
If you do get a K&N - or other reuseable filter that gets oiled, be careful not to overoil it. I once bought a '77 GS750 that had a K&N replacement filter. It wouldn't rev beyond 6k. Checked plugs, wires, carbs, stator...everything. Found a forum post that suggested maybe the filter was overoiled causing restriction. Removed, cleaned and dried the filter good. Ran like a champ afterwards.
Just something to keep in mind.
__________________
'99 996 Arctic silver over black. In the past I've owned and wrenched on a '96 Audi A4, '86 944 NA. '79 928, '72 914. Non-Teutonic vehicles of interest: 3 MGB's (one converted to V8 power), Triumph Stag & TR250, Jensen-Healey, T-Bird SC. Most recent "project" was a Factory Five MKII Roadster. |
||
|
|
|
|
Going faster all the time
|
The sound is good.
But the trade off is bad. Save your money and hassle. In the end, not worth it. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Tags |
| why a k&n intake |