Quote:
Originally posted by Aurel
Randy, I sincerely respect what you have done. But my point is that cancer affects much more people, directly, than terrorism. Yet, much more ressources are dedicated to fight terrorism than cancer. It does not make sense to me. The risk of dying from cancer is statistically far greater than being affected by any type of terrorist act. One man out of two, and one woman out of three, will develop some form of cancer during their life. Should not the ressources be proportional to the risk of death if the goal is to save lives ?
Aurel
|
Here's an interesting fact, we spend four times more money on snack foods a year than NASA's yearly budget....