Quote:
Originally posted by Superman
I also wonder how fully informed, both in terms of the facts of those particular cases as well as the general principles of constitutional law, are those people who are so vigorously convinced that the majority of the Supreme Court of the United States of America just made two decisions that are obviously, clearly contrary to law and to the US Constitution. That's heavy charge, and it's levelled against some judicial heavyweights.
I can only assume RedBeard is a Harvard Law School professor who owns a complete copy of the files in those two cases. Because I know that Supreme Court decisions are not as simple as NASCAR races, even if they seem to be that simple when you don't have all the facts.
|
Supe, you're the one without the facts. They are overstepping what _us_ the public wants. They are not constraining the expansion of power by the Federal government. They are supposed to be the "last resort" where a bad law or bad decision is struck down.
But they are kept in place for "Good Behavior". Going against a super-majority of the public is not "Good Behavior".
So, are you saying you _support_ these two decisions? If I'm wrong, and ignorant, then _you_, the all knowing Superman, must support these two decisions.
