![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
|
![]()
I just read something interesting about spark plug heat range selection.
It seems, for every 75-100HP you add to your motor, you should go one range/step colder when selecting spark plugs. I never knew this to be honest! There you go, you learn something new every day ![]()
__________________
Merv '89 911 Turbo Cab Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,381
|
Where did you read that? Not trying to doubt you, but curious. Do you have a link or the whole article. Sometimes, not all the time, things are taken out of context. If you can believe that..
![]()
__________________
Bill 997.2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
It may not be that simple. I am not an expert just a 930 owner/addict.
I have 505 rwhp. So that is what ...about 594 at the motor? I was running cold (NGK 7 range) spark plugs and they kept getting fouled. I swapped them out for some hotter ones and it is better so far. Only more time (and miles) will tell.
__________________
Kirk Crashed: Silver 1992 Turbo S2 Sold: '86 930 minor mods; '94 3.6 Turbo; '85 Euro 930 (3.2 Intake, Tec3r EFI, TwinPlug, Garrett Turbo, JE 8.1 Pistons, 505 rwhp) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
|
I read it in a tech section on the NGK.com WEB site.
If you add significant HP gains to your motor with more boost, you will need a colder plug in order to remove heat from the combustion chamber more efficiently. If you run a plug that is too hot for your motor, you risk detonation under heavy loads (which is BAD). If you run a colder plug for your motor, the only risk is that the plug will foul quicker. I personally would rather be changing fouled plugs more frequently, than running the risk of severe engine damage by running a plug that is borderline ![]() I'm currently running W3CS plugs and they seem to be performing better in my motor than the W4CS plugs I had in there previously.
__________________
Merv '89 911 Turbo Cab Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
What about the DPO's? Does the W3CS work better or just cheaper? will the W3CS work on a stock engine..and what did you pay for them?
Thanks Bob
__________________
1 bad 930 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
|
DPO's are Platinum plugs and have a longer lifespan than the CS's. The DPO's also fire more reliably on stock ignitions at higher than stock boost levels, but since I run a CDI, that's not really an issue for me. W3CS would work fine on a stock motor at stock boost levels. Certainly a cheaper alternative to the DPO's, at the same heat range as recommended by the factory.
I suspect the factory specified a 3 heat range because they knew their customers would be thrashing their cars on/off the track, so they wanted the extra insurance of running a colder plug. At the end of the day, cost was the factor for me. I was quoted AUD$50 for each DPO plug ![]() ![]() EDIT: I know a warmer plug will stay cleaner longer, but I'm not risking pinging/detonation in my motor, especially at the boost levels I run. $50 on a set of plugs every 7,500k's is more cost effective than an engine rebuild ![]()
__________________
Merv '89 911 Turbo Cab Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition ![]() Last edited by WydRyd; 04-11-2007 at 06:27 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
A fellow Pelacanite
|
Merv, maybe you could get the W3DPO's sent to you from the USA at a reasonable cost.
__________________
1981 UK 930. G50/01 shortened, 964 3.8RS Fibreglass Body Kit, 18" Alloys 8.5" F & 10" R, 225's F & 285's R, Special Colour Metallic Blue Paint, FIA Sparco Evo's, A/C and Air Pump removed, Electronic Boost Controller, GHL Headers, Tial46 WG. Fitting - New service kit. Needs Fitting - Innovate XD-16 Kit, Kokeln IC. Stephen's K27 HFS, EVO Intake Assy & his Modded USA Fuel Head. 1983 UK 911 3.2 Carrera Sport Coupe. Black, Black Leather with Red Piping, Black Alloy Gear Knob, K&N Air Filter Element, Turbo Tie rods. Needs Fitting - K&N CO Sensor, Round A/F Dial Gauge, Factory Short Shift Kit. http://www.danasoft.com/sig/Iamnotanumber.jpg |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
|
Yeh, I looked into that, but it was still cost prohibitive, especially since I'll soon require 12 plugs
![]() ![]()
__________________
Merv '89 911 Turbo Cab Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|