![]() |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 102
|
Why so much lag?
Excuse my ignorance on this but I'm a bit perplexed as to why our cars suffer from so much turbo lag? Is the turbo inefficient? Or is it something else? I would think a 3.3L engine should have plenty of flow to spool a turbo really quick.
For those of you that have been able to improve spool up over stock, I'd love to hear what you did. |
||
![]() |
|
Driver
|
The motor might displace 3.3 liters, but it's a low compression 3.3 liters at that.
Plus remember that this was the 3rd production turbocharged car on the market, so turbocharging was at its infancy when this motor was designed. So yes, the turbos are relatively inefficient compared to more modern designs.
__________________
1987 Venetian Blue (looks like grey) 930 Coupe 1990 Black 964 C2 Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Brando
|
There are options. Ask rarelyl8. He's got some good turbos.
|
||
![]() |
|
Slantnose from HELL
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 888
|
For the motor more compression, newer cam profile, more efficient turbo. The intake system, and fuel/ spark management. All these things done to a 930 would make massive leaps in performance. Most tend to want double or more than the factory HP. But if one were to simply shoot for 350 HP and bump up the compression with a more efficient turbo, lag would be almost nonexistant.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Upgraded to B&B Headers and Exhaust + K-27HFS Turbo and it changed the whole character of the way the engine makes power. There is still some lag, but not much. I plan to add a long neck intoercooler next to help take the remaining Lag out..
__________________
Mark ![]() 1986 930 Ultra-Smith/RUF Slant Nose conversion, 3.4 BTR Spec, K-27HFS, RUF IC, TIAL .9 BAR Waste Gate, 930 4 speed transmission, RUF Front Oil Cooler, RarlyL8 Headers, RUF 4 Pipe Exhaust |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Central Washington State
Posts: 4,398
|
Turbo lag is all about how fast the turbo recovers after the BOV dumps (or recirculates) the boosted air. The best thing you can do to minimize the lag is get rid of the stock 3LDZ and replace it with a K27 variety...either 7600 (for more top end boost) or 7200 (for earlier onset). Either will show a reduced lag. But, the larger impact is getting rid of any exhaust restrictions. That means at the very least ditching the catalytic converter, going with a through-flowing muffler (or no muffler at all....can you say Zork?), and topping it off with a set of headers. The less restriction, the better for spooling up the turbo.
You can shop around and add upgrades such as these piece-meal (as I did) or just go to a known and proven source of custom made quality parts for the entire package. See Brian @ RarelyL8.
__________________
Mark H. 1987 930, GP White, Wevo shifter, Borla exhaust, B&B intercooler, stock 3LDZ. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,144
|
My sig below pretty much eliminated any lag on my car.
__________________
'87, Modified WUR, Billet valve, 965 downpipe, Kokeln intercooler, GHL headers, Garrett T04B K27 hybrid, Tial w/.8 bar, WEGO IV, RarlyL8 dual out, LSD |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
As the the guys here have stated.
New turbo and free flow exhaust will give much improvement over stock 3LDZ turbo This recording was done on my 78 930 after I rebuilt the stock engine. As you see, full boost at 2300 rpm My mods: Removed emission stuff, updated to SC cams with 1,65mm timing, new K27-7200 turbo, ported intake ports to 35mm, new headers and RarlyL8 dual out free floating muffler.
__________________
Trond R. 1979 930: Garret GT35r turbo, EFI, carerra intake, Link EMS, custom GT2 cams, 98mm JE P/C, 964 crank (stroker), custom valves & ported (XtremeCylinderHeads) etc..etc.. 1972 914-6 GT replica project 1986 944 Turbo Last edited by totle; 01-06-2013 at 02:18 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,126
|
Totle, wow! That's impressive spooling.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 102
|
Thanks for all the info gents. I've already got a K27-7200 but I still feel its got too much lag for me. With the ideas you all mention, I will definitely start replacing some of the stock parts like the exhaust headers. My concern is with tuning, I'm used to using modern EMS's so I'll have to do some reading and ensure that when I change parts out the engine is still getting proper amounts of fuel and timing.
Another quick question, has anyone used ball bearing turbos with good success? |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,126
|
Search GT35R. A handful have used BB turbos.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,581
|
Free Flowing exhaust alone reduces lag by about 1000rpm, we were shocked at the difference a rarelyL8 did to my friends 930, 4 bolts and about an hours work tops. Then switch out your turbo and possibly cams when you want to further reduce lag, I bet you'll be pretty chuffed for a while with just a muffler. Hit Brian up (rarelyL8), he's a dude.
__________________
'89 911 M491+Turbo '89 944 Turbo '88 928S4 '18 C63S Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Pete, you will always have some lag with these cars.
Plenty you can do to make it better, as the other guys have said. Best thing to do is just keep the revs up. Drive it this way for some time and you get used to it. When driving it hard or on track, you learn to be on the gas when braking. It takes some doing, but its all about timing the boost when you hit the apex. Its great fun when you master this style. And bloody quick. Good luck.
__________________
79 Silver 930 SOLD ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 140
|
wow, full boost at 2,300rpm is impressive indeed!
i get full boost on my 3.0 at about 3,100rpm with the below mods.
__________________
Cheers Mark 1989 944 S2 Cab // 1983 SC Cab //1977 930 3.0 - back from the dead! custom turbokraft IC, Motec M600, 550cc injectors, individual coil packs, 964 cams, UMW HFS7200 turbo, billy boat headers, turbo thomas back box, 996T oil pump, 3.2 JE pistons and barrels = 375.6bhp // 1973 BMW 3.0 CSL // 1973 E Type FHC |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
I have 964 cams too, set to 1.26mm (stock value for 964 cams), but boost of 1bar is reached at about 3100rpm. Do you think that early boost is mostly due the timing setting, or maybe caused by the stock exhaust ports, or what...? I see you changed your setup since. Do you still have that early full boost (1bar?) with that new setup?
__________________
Roland 930 Turbo '81 Too many modifications to list Last edited by proffighter; 01-07-2013 at 11:48 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|