![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: highland mills NY
Posts: 593
|
GT35R vs KKK K27HF
So I go to one of my favorite state parks to take a ride the other day and I notice like gray smoke will under boost. I notice it only does it in the park. So I am thinking I have to much oil in my car. I was on the high side. So I take some out, go for a ride around local roads and no smoke good to go. I go back to state park and same thing. I figure SH-T I must have a bad turbo (GT35R). Take out the old K27HF and put it on, same thing. So now I am stumped. The car does not burn oil, runs like a champ , rebuilt about 5000 miles ago.
I am in the park today and notice a car go by me and I see some gray smoke. I pull my car to the side and check out the road. What an IDIOT I am. The road still has sand and dust from the winter all over and my tail pipe aims down a little and I was just blowing the crap off the road as I was driving agressive. That's why it did not do it on my local roads , a lot cleaner. LOL... Since I had the K27HF on I had a chance to compare both turbo's with my EFI conversion. Well, no comparison. With EFI the GT35R blows the K27HF away. Spools up so much faster, much smoother pull. In my book night and day. Now before EFI, when I was CIS, I loved the k27HF. My opinion with CIS the K27HF with SC cams is the best set up for street car. I went 964 cams and for street driving I like the SC better. Then I went to the GT35 on CIS and even thou it was better than the K27HF, I did not think it was worth the money for a CIS car. Then I EFI the car. The car is wild fire with 964 cams and GT35. I have not driven other EFI cars to compare. I should not say that, my friend had a EFI 930 with Halteck but the car ran like SH-T, so I dont want to use that as a comparison. If I were to stay CIS. SC cams and K27HF. Great set up.... John
__________________
83 sc cab turbo widebody. 3.5 liter supertec motor, B&B headers, EFI electromotive TecGT, TurboKraft GT35R billet turbo, 964 cams, WM inj, Bell full bay intercooler, Short bell housing turbo 4 speed tranny, roll bar, hargett shifter, |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
Great feedback, John. And good to hear no issues either.
|
||
![]() |
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
It is good that you were able to compare not only the turbos but CIS vs EFI vs cams with the same turbos.
We find the same to be true, the setups are completely different and require different turbos for more optimum performance. The GT35 is a bigger turbo than the K27HF which can be taken advantage of with EFI. The most WHP I have seen personally using a K27HF was 505WHP, but no other turbo was used to compare with that setup. We now use K27/K29 hybrids on high HP CIS engines and find them to be at least equal to the K27HF if not a tad bigger on the top end. The most important thing is to size the turbo to the engine and expected power curve, no matter what brand you prefer.
__________________
RarlyL8 Motorsports / M&K Exhaust - 911/930 Exhaust Systems, Turbos, TiAL, CIS Mods/Rebuilds '78 911SC Widebody, 930 engine, 915 Tranny, K27, SC Cams, RL8 Headers & GT3 Muffler. 350whp @ 0.75bar Brian B. (256)536-9977 Service@MKExhaust Brian@RarlyL8 |
||
![]() |
|
Boost Abuser
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 461
|
Thanks for the info since I'm in the market for a turbo right now anyway. I was highly considering the gt35 and the was pretty much set on that but now it looks like the old k27 is back in the running. My car is cis with sc cams etc. I currently have a standard k27 that's undersized for my set up. It runs out of breath at 5500 rpm and I'm ready for more punch!!!!!
|
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
Why the hell would you consider the K27?
![]() You like laggier, less power turbos? No offense to current K27 users. ![]() ![]() It's not just the fact the GT35 flows more air (worry of CIS owners), the REDUCED BACKPRESSURE of the GT35R is freeing up parasitic horsepower (more power WITHOUT needing ADDITIONAL fuel). Last edited by Tippy; 04-13-2015 at 08:13 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
The K27 series was used by Porsche for the 930 and 965 and are for all practical purposes plug and play. This is important for many. The performance differences are minor on stockish CIS engines. The K27 series turbos are also bullet proof, often exceeding 100,000 miles of service.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
Quote:
But, you can get the GT35 journal-bearing a lot cheaper and I'd imagine the longevity would be right up there with the K27. |
||
![]() |
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
Porsche used KKK made in Germany, not Garrett made in Mexico.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: highland mills NY
Posts: 593
|
Quote:
For more punch up top you have to change your cams to 964. I was like you and went to 964 cams. I dont think the turbo alone will help you up top. Again the difference was only if you want to rev the care past 6000 rpms. With the sc cams the power cam on a little earlier. With the GT turbo and EFI it spools so fast so you get the best of both worlds.
__________________
83 sc cab turbo widebody. 3.5 liter supertec motor, B&B headers, EFI electromotive TecGT, TurboKraft GT35R billet turbo, 964 cams, WM inj, Bell full bay intercooler, Short bell housing turbo 4 speed tranny, roll bar, hargett shifter, Last edited by jbrown; 04-13-2015 at 12:01 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: highland mills NY
Posts: 593
|
KKK are great turbos. Definitly a great match for CIS. I agree with rarlyl8, bullet proof. If I had to pick between the GT35 or K27HF , HFS and I was staying CIS. I would go with the KKK turbo. It worked so go for years for me. EFI I am really happy with the GT, I hope I get the longevity out of it. I do let it cool down before I turn the car off . The only time I did that with the KKK is after a hard run. casual driving I would turn it right off and never had a problem in 8 yrs..
__________________
83 sc cab turbo widebody. 3.5 liter supertec motor, B&B headers, EFI electromotive TecGT, TurboKraft GT35R billet turbo, 964 cams, WM inj, Bell full bay intercooler, Short bell housing turbo 4 speed tranny, roll bar, hargett shifter, Last edited by jbrown; 04-13-2015 at 11:58 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Boost Abuser
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 461
|
Shoot me a pm with info. Thanks
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 259
|
If you like the 964 cam for the bit more top end you get, try the 993SS cams. I'm making power to 7000 RPM with a K27/29. It about as much cam you can go with a CIS car.
Jimmy |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Smart quod bastardus
|
Quote:
I have a k27S turbo in my 930 with some major upgrades and according to compressor maps that I have found regarding the k27 turbo's limits I might be at its limits as well. thanks for any input,
__________________
1979 930 Turbo....3.4L, 7.5to1 comp, SC cams, full bay intercooler, Rarlyl8 headers, Garret GTX turbo, 36mm ported intakes, Innovate Auxbox/LM-1, custom Manually Adjustable wastegate housing (0.8-1.1bar),--running 0.95 bar max ---"When you're racing it's life! Anything else either before or after, is just waiting" |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
I have a turbo that can blow the jugs right off my 3.4 (Borg Warner S366 good to 830hp), and the sign is simply hp drop off past a given RPM.
In my case with Carrera 3.2 cams (same specs as SC), hp drop beyond 6K in higher gears. |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
993SS do not require piston relief. I'm using these on the Evil Engine build and did add bigger springs as the redline will be stretched to 7200rpm.
We did see the K27-7200 hang on a bit longer, from 5500rpm to 6300rpm, before dropping off when my headers were added to our test engine.
__________________
RarlyL8 Motorsports / M&K Exhaust - 911/930 Exhaust Systems, Turbos, TiAL, CIS Mods/Rebuilds '78 911SC Widebody, 930 engine, 915 Tranny, K27, SC Cams, RL8 Headers & GT3 Muffler. 350whp @ 0.75bar Brian B. (256)536-9977 Service@MKExhaust Brian@RarlyL8 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 259
|
Tippy... It is a full on build, xtreme did the heads , Ti retainers , springs, etc and the Pistons are JE that needed a Little work for the valves to clear.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 259
|
I just saw Brian's post. I know my Pistons needed work, I' will check with the shop tomorrow. We did end up going with 7:65.1 compression ( measured), that might be the reason
|
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
Ah ok. Thanks Brian and Jimmy.
|
||
![]() |
|
Smart quod bastardus
|
Quote:
I have not dyno-ed my car yet, I do all my tuning on the road and at track days. So I was looking for signs that I could monitor thru seat of the pants and my boost gage and AF meter. I don't notice a drop in power above 6000rpm, the beast pulls hard there. thanks, Fred
__________________
1979 930 Turbo....3.4L, 7.5to1 comp, SC cams, full bay intercooler, Rarlyl8 headers, Garret GTX turbo, 36mm ported intakes, Innovate Auxbox/LM-1, custom Manually Adjustable wastegate housing (0.8-1.1bar),--running 0.95 bar max ---"When you're racing it's life! Anything else either before or after, is just waiting" |
||
![]() |
|