![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
Hello Everyone. Kindly looking for some advice and a next step really!
Just put my case halves together on my 85 3.2 engine. Everything seemed to go very well but after torqueing it up (followed Wayne's method per the book), I am seeing a lot less Loctite 574 squeeze-out from the top of the engine versus the bottom. I have included some pictures of top and bottom as a comparison. Everything seemed to seat very well when I dropped the left-hand-side onto the right and it also looked like I had really good coverage of the 574 before I did that, top and bottom. Just wondered if anyone has seen something similar or know of any reasons it could have pulled together like this? This was a stressful process for me and I went through 3 or 4 dry fits (no 574) before I did the real one yesterday. My concern is whether to tear it all down again and clean, redo or continue on as is and hope for the best! Any advice would be very welcomed. Thank you ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
interesting, subscribing because i would like to know as well.
__________________
81 SC 3.8 Conversion 2017 Macan S INSTAGRAM @tail_spinz |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 13,816
|
That case seam above #8 nose bearing looks pretty wide to me. Did you leave case on its side while 574 dried?
__________________
House producers wanted to end the show after season 8 to keep the enigmatic appeal of the central character and maintain the show's mystique. Ahhh The Mystique!!! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Thanks for the replies everyone.
I agree about that gap but I looked more closely and it seems the gap is just near the surface and there is a tighter metal-metal contact just a bit further in. I'll take another look this evening and add any pics if I can Mike |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Anything that doesn’t look cosher near the # 8 , i would definitely open the case again. (Don’t ask
Me how i know) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,575
|
I used 574 on my '88 rebuild a few years ago but it seems there are some who suggest that there are better options for this area. I think this on on that massive sealant thread that has been going on forever.
__________________
Buck '88 Coupe, '87 Cab, '88 535i sold, '19 GLC 300 DD Warren Hall, gone but not forgotten |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,575
|
I used 574 on my '88 rebuild a few years ago but it seems there are some who suggest that there are better options for this area. I think this on on that massive sealant thread that has been going on forever.
__________________
Buck '88 Coupe, '87 Cab, '88 535i sold, '19 GLC 300 DD Warren Hall, gone but not forgotten |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
That gap over #8 doesn't look correct. Maybe the timing (dowel) pin isn't engaged properly. I'd pull it apart. JMO
__________________
'77 1973 911RS Backdate, 2.7 liter w/webers '70 911ST , 3.2 liter '82 '74 911 IROC Tribute , 3.0 in progress '75 911 RSR street car in progress '77 930 Replica '75 993 GT2 EVO race car , 3.6 TT '79 928 5 speed money pit in progress |
||
![]() |
|
The 9 Store
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 5,314
|
I agree.
__________________
All used parts sold as is. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Just wanted to follow-up with you all and thanks again for the suggestions. I have decided to shuck the oyster and not proceed thanks to a few of you that noticed the problem around #8 bearing. Not sure what it is yet but should know over the weekend.
I actually found that I could insert a 0.010" feeler gauge through the case near the #8 and that the 574 was still wet in that area, which I suppose makes sense if there is a gap and some small amount of air could get at it. See picture Will follow-up with my findings soon. Hoping for a pearl! Regards All ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,575
|
The #8 nose bearing area is critical as far as sealing to avoid leaks. Lots of good tips on how to ensure that's done correctly on some of the "oil leak" threads. I think you are doing the smart thing and it will pay off in the long run.
__________________
Buck '88 Coupe, '87 Cab, '88 535i sold, '19 GLC 300 DD Warren Hall, gone but not forgotten |
||
![]() |
|
PCA Member since 1988
|
You ain't the first to make that mistake!
![]()
__________________
1973.5 911T with RoW 1980 SC CIS stroked to 3.2, 10:1 Mahle Sport p/c's, TBC exhaust ports, M1 cams, SSI's. RSR bushings & adj spring plates, Koni Sports, 21/26mm T-bars, stock swaybars, 16x7 Fuchs w Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 205/55-16 at all 4 corners. Cars are for driving. If you want art, get something you can hang on the wall! |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: northeast
Posts: 4,527
|
were/are you able to turn the crank 360+ degrees...?
I would also look for a pearl inside...))
__________________
I live for 911 tweaks... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
any update on this ? Curious what the problem was/is .
H
__________________
'77 1973 911RS Backdate, 2.7 liter w/webers '70 911ST , 3.2 liter '82 '74 911 IROC Tribute , 3.0 in progress '75 911 RSR street car in progress '77 930 Replica '75 993 GT2 EVO race car , 3.6 TT '79 928 5 speed money pit in progress |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Tags |
3.2 , 911 , rebuild , sealant |