Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > 1- Porsche Technical Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
up-fixing der car(ma)
 
YTNUKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 3,739
Garage
Send a message via AIM to YTNUKLR
3.2SS: Carrera or SC heads?

I've got these Carrera 3.2 heads sitting here about to be rebuilt for a 3.2SS. I will be using 46mm webers and DRCAMS DC60 or DC62 camshafts (and racing valve springs). I am strongly thinking about going twin-plug, with JE pistons in the 10.8:1 range. (This engine is going to use an SC crank, so 98mmx70.4mm).

BUT,

I've talked to a few people and they recommend I use the big-port 78-79 911SC heads instead of the Carrera 3.2 heads. I would like to run the 38/39/40 mm ports that they have...but if I already have 3.2 heads, why should I trade them in for the SC heads??

Thanks in advance
Scott
Old 01-17-2005, 01:54 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Licensed User
 
Shuie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ....down Highway 61
Posts: 6,441
Isnt the volume of the 3.2 heads different (bigger) than the SC heads? If so, you will obviously get a compression drop. Big port SC heads would be plenty big enough, but if you already have the Carrera heads.

Sorry Im not much help. I dont have any idea what I would do. Maybe tap them for MFI, run a real hot cam, and spin it as fast as possible . Oh, nevermind. you already have the 46mm carbs

Last edited by Shuie; 01-17-2005 at 05:59 PM..
Old 01-17-2005, 05:50 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Still Doin Time
 
asphaltgambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nokesville, Va.
Posts: 5,254
My understanding is that the 3.2SC heads from '84-88 are the best flowing out there. In some cases (racing) you may want to actually reduce (narrow) the intake and exhaust ports for better high rpm airflow like in a short-stroke 3.2
__________________
'07 Jeep SRT-8 - Hauls groceries and Hauls *ss
'85 Guards Red Targa - F@#king Money Pit
'95 Road King w/117ci - No time to ride, see above
'77 Sportster Pro-Street Drag Bike w/93ci - Sold to collector
'72 Yamaha CS5 200 Twin - Sold to fellow Pelicanite
Old 01-18-2005, 08:04 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Try not, Do or Do not
 
Henry Schmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallbrook, Ca. 92028
Posts: 5,934
Garage
I believe the 3.0 are a better choice. The flange is longer on the SC heads and the ports can be modified to suit your needs. The ports on the 3.2 heads are so large that port velocity is negatively affected. The SC and 3.2 chambers CC the same and the valves are the same.
If you want MFI it is very difficult to machine Carrera (3.2) heads for the injector.
__________________
Henry Schmidt
SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE
Ph: 760-728-3062
Email: supertec1@earthlink.net
Old 01-18-2005, 12:42 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:27 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.