Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
tadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mount Airy, MD
Posts: 4,299
Crankshaft weights

Can anyone point me to a reference that calls out the weights of the various crankshafts, CW 66 mm, T 66 mm, CW 70.4 mm?

Kenikh and I were discussing if the 70.4 was just a offset ground 66 since the journal size is 5 mm different and the stroke change is 4.4 mm. So if a big crecent of metal is removed from the journal, one might guess that the 70.4 crank should be a bit lighter than the 66 mm crank.

Anyone care to elaborate on this?

Tadd

__________________
1967 912 with centerlocks… 10 years and still in pieces!
Old 06-02-2006, 01:46 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Stressed Member
 
Scott Clarke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 1,116
Garage
Tadd-
I think that the 70.4mm crank has wider journals, compensating for their smaller diameter. The reason the journals are smaller in diameter is so that the longer stroke crank would still fit in an unmodified case.
-Scott
__________________
'70 911E short stroke 2.5 MFI. Sold
'56 Cliff May Prefab
Old 06-02-2006, 06:37 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
tadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mount Airy, MD
Posts: 4,299
I got one in the mail...

so I can answer 2/3 of my question soon. The non-counterweighted 66 mm crank is 27# by my bathroom scale (which matches the missues oncologist's scale).

Anyone want to fill in the CWed 66 mm crankshaft weight?



Scott:
Left my copy of Waynes book at work. I will check on that since I didn't even pay attention to that point.

tadd
__________________
1967 912 with centerlocks… 10 years and still in pieces!
Old 06-02-2006, 08:22 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Stressed Member
 
Scott Clarke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 1,116
Garage
Tadd-
I can give you a rough weight this weekend.
-Scott
__________________
'70 911E short stroke 2.5 MFI. Sold
'56 Cliff May Prefab
Old 06-02-2006, 08:36 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 743
Hello again.

Yes, IMHO the 66 can be stroked to the 2.4/2.7 by offset grinding ...if you have plenty of time!

Its easy to put them side by sside to see this..

The 70.5 is much weaker because of the loss of overlap between the main and big end journals.

The 66mm is much heavier than needed and could be reengineered.


Would anyone be interested in a batch of racing-quality light 66mm cranks using modern fea etc techniques?

Kind regards
David
Old 06-02-2006, 11:49 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,202
Garage
what would be the cost and how much weight saving and are they 66CW

Michael
Old 06-03-2006, 05:22 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
3 restos WIP = psycho
 
kenikh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North of Exit 17
Posts: 7,665
Quote:
Originally posted by Walko
what would be the cost and how much weight saving and are they 66CW

Michael
Ditto to the question.
__________________

- 1965 911
- 1969 911S
- 1980 911SC Targa
- 1979 930
Old 06-03-2006, 06:58 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 743
Hello, Michael.

We have not actually done a pukka design job here..but some rough stuff suggested at least 25%..

It could be made with counterweights on...but..why?

Without these IMHO would be the way to go..with lighter narrow joutrnal rods and pistons the case pounding should not be significant between builds, for a 9000 rpm circuit engine, and insignificant in road use.

Kind regards
David
Old 06-03-2006, 07:02 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
3 restos WIP = psycho
 
kenikh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North of Exit 17
Posts: 7,665
Quote:
Originally posted by davidppp


It could be made with counterweights on...but..why?

Because with counterweights you have the meat to do a zero balance to any rods and pistons you choose. I won't use a non C/W crank for that reason.
__________________

- 1965 911
- 1969 911S
- 1980 911SC Targa
- 1979 930
Old 06-03-2006, 07:50 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
tadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mount Airy, MD
Posts: 4,299
Davidppp:
Wouldn't it be more correct to say that the 66 crank was way over designed rather than the 70.4 was weaker?

Porsche did use 'selected stock' cranks with 906 Ti rods in the 2.14 turbo RSR car that beat out 500+ Hp. Of course the mag cases could only last for 6 hour races... . Again, Porsche used the 66 for their racing 2.2-2.4s using steel rods that were 727g each with a +/-3g callout (Porsche 911 story p.187). Those were some mighty beefy rods!

It wasn't till the 70.4 mm cranked 2.5 that they couldn't keep flywheels on (and broke some cranks)... BUT... the 450g Ti rods were never homogentaed for the 2.5s which I bet would have helped if not solved the problem.

Which then brings up the RSR, which won all sorts of races and that can't be done by breaking cranks. So what gives?

tadd
__________________
1967 912 with centerlocks… 10 years and still in pieces!
Old 06-03-2006, 08:18 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 743
Hello, Tadd.

As you say its relative.

But it is true to say that all the race motors which used 70.4mm rods broke cranks, especially the 2.8, and the factory tried hard to find the solution..

My bet would be on resonance..

My pal is a pukka metallurgist who has extensive experience with solving the problems of high speed reliabilty..

So if there is enough demand, the 70.4mm Solution is probably available..
Old 06-04-2006, 01:55 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Registered
 
Plavan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 2,806
Garage
Bringing this back to life.
Just in from the same digital scale

66mm CW std/std crank= 30 pounds
66mm T crank= 27.5 pounds
__________________
Chad Plavan
911ST Race Car/2.5L SS Race Motor #02
1972 911T- Numbers matching- Restoring to stock
2011 Porsche Spyder Wht/Blk/Carbon Fiber Buckets/6-Speed (Sold)
2016 Elan NP01 Prototype racecar- Chassis #20, #02
Old 11-07-2006, 01:25 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
 
Try not, Do or Do not
 
Henry Schmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallbrook, Ca. 92028
Posts: 14,083
Garage
The 2.0/2.2 crank is not the same casting as the 2.4/2.7 crank.
The webs are completely different thickness.
The 70.4 crank used in the 2.8 and 3.0 RSR were special racing cranks. They had wider flyweights and narrow rod similar to the 3.0 production crank.
They (RSR) also came from the factory with titanium rods. The same rods that were used in the 917, 908 and later the 935.
Many of the ti rods were replaced with after market rods and that's when the engine started seeing crank problems again.
__________________
Henry Schmidt
SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE
Ph: 760-728-3062
Email: supertec1@earthlink.net
Old 11-07-2006, 03:57 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)
Try not, Do or Do not
 
Henry Schmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallbrook, Ca. 92028
Posts: 14,083
Garage
Machining the 66 mm crank to use a 3.0 style rod /journal with a large fillet sounds like a great idea if buying custom rods is within the budget.

Smaller journal=lighter crank.
__________________
Henry Schmidt
SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE
Ph: 760-728-3062
Email: supertec1@earthlink.net
Old 11-07-2006, 04:59 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #14 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 7,007
Quote:
Originally posted by Henry Schmidt
The 2.0/2.2 crank is not the same casting as the 2.4/2.7 crank.
The webs are completely different thickness.
The 70.4 crank used in the 2.8 and 3.0 RSR were special racing cranks. They had wider flyweights and narrow rod similar to the 3.0 production crank.
They (RSR) also came from the factory with titanium rods. The same rods that were used in the 917, 908 and later the 935.
Many of the ti rods were replaced with after market rods and that's when the engine started seeing crank problems again.
Henry:

FYI,..The 3.0 RSR crank had different fillets that solved the breakage; they still had a propensity to spit the flywheels off at 8K and over. Too bad one can no longer buy Glyco RSR bearings with the correct shape for these excellent cranks.

2.8 & 3.0 RSR engines all came with steel rods. No Titanium until the 935's came along. I raced these cars from '76 on and had both,...

Here are a set of RSR rods
__________________
Steve Weiner
Rennsport Systems
Portland Oregon
(503) 244-0990
porsche@rennsportsystems.com
www.rennsportsystems.com

Last edited by Steve@Rennsport; 11-07-2006 at 09:39 PM..
Old 11-07-2006, 05:36 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #15 (permalink)
Try not, Do or Do not
 
Henry Schmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallbrook, Ca. 92028
Posts: 14,083
Garage
I'll stand corrected.
Oh well. You can't be right all the time.
Funny though, I took a 3.0 RSR apart that was sporting a set of factory looking titanium rods.
I also sold a set of ti rods for an RSR to the owner of a 74 RSR living in Arizona.
He seemed to think they belonged.
I wonder if there was a sprint engine?
__________________
Henry Schmidt
SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE
Ph: 760-728-3062
Email: supertec1@earthlink.net
Old 11-07-2006, 06:10 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #16 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 7,007
LOL,..I'd bet that you saw a set of 935 rods which look the same, except for their polished finish. I have a set here somewhere and if I can find them, I'll shoot you a picture. These are IMHO, life-limited parts and these had PLENTY of time on them before we removed them from service.

Quite a few of these Ti rods found their way into various GTU & GTO engines during that time since the RX-7's and BMW's (3.5 CSL & M-1 cars) gave the Porsche's fits,...

Since we were largely "self-sponsored" during that time, we used a few sets of 935 Ti rods in our 3.5 RSR motor sourced from local 935 teams and thats how we found that these do NOT last forever.

The factory was not racing RSR's but they did support many well-heeled privateers and sprint motors were not uncommon. We had two motors; one was a 20 hr version (custom cams and very high CR) and one was a 40-50 hour one.
__________________
Steve Weiner
Rennsport Systems
Portland Oregon
(503) 244-0990
porsche@rennsportsystems.com
www.rennsportsystems.com
Old 11-07-2006, 09:49 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #17 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 7,007
The radii are the same.
__________________
Steve Weiner
Rennsport Systems
Portland Oregon
(503) 244-0990
porsche@rennsportsystems.com
www.rennsportsystems.com
Old 11-08-2006, 02:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
356RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,333
Garage
I Love It............Great Infomation guys.

__________________
Mark Jung
Bend, OR
MFI Werks.com
Old 11-09-2006, 08:35 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #19 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:26 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.