![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 12
|
Engine savers for Mechanical tensioners
77 911s. Thoughts on these vs upgrade to hydraulic.
Thanks PK |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
Mechanical bad, hydraulic good.
-Andy
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I'll second that
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: mt. vernon Wa. USA
Posts: 8,720
|
I'd use the mechanical tensioners w/savers. The hydraulic versions have been known to fail, as well.
P.S. If you do a search on this topic you'll get all the opinions you wanted and more. it's been beaten to death.
__________________
[B]Current projects: 69-911.5, Previous:73 911X (off to SanFrancisco/racing in Germany).77 911S (NY), 71E (France/Corsica), 66-912 ( France), 1970 914X (Wisconsin) 76 911S roller..off to Florida/Germany RGruppe #669 http://www.x-faktory.com/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
Ok,
I didn't understand the original post. I thought you were talking about pure mechanical tensioners which some people use on race engines. They just have a fixed adjustment and no plunger to take shock loads. The early tensioners I wouldn't call mechanical just early. Early tensioners can work ok if you update the idler arms and use the savers. I'd overhaul or exchange for rebuilt and add the later (1980+) idler arms before I'd be happy with them. -Andy
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|