![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cooperstown NY
Posts: 894
|
warped 1972 magnesium case
starting the rebuild, disassembled the engine.
most things in spec needed a head for broken fins, several cylinders were pitted. mostly small stuff and i'm planning on doing the suggested upgrades checked the case for warping with a straight edge and found it was .002" out at the bearing surface. does the need to be flattened and align bored? or (no flaming) would the case bolts pull it together? i'm planning on sending it out for casesavers and the oil pump upgrade anyhow. thanks, bob |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 7,007
|
Bob:
The BEST thing you can do with that case is have the case halves machined flat and the main bearing centerline bored back to standard. This is VERY common with those things and the only way to fix it. Depending on displacement, cams, and usage, I would have it shuffle-pinned as well.
__________________
Steve Weiner Rennsport Systems Portland Oregon (503) 244-0990 porsche@rennsportsystems.com www.rennsportsystems.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cooperstown NY
Posts: 894
|
thanks steve.
i'm doing a stock rebuild, so was not planning the shuffle pins. bob |
||
![]() |
|
Try not, Do or Do not
|
Steve is correct about the best way to proceed but my question might be "how did you measure the case?" Laying a straight edge in the saddles of an open case will hardly give you an accurate measure of main saddle straightness.
The case must be bolted together and properly torqued to give you an accurate measurement. If you do this and only have a .002 variance, run it and enjoy.
__________________
Henry Schmidt SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE Ph: 760-728-3062 Email: supertec1@earthlink.net |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cooperstown NY
Posts: 894
|
henry,
the case is split and a long straight edge went from end to end. the saddles were .002" shy of the edge. thanks, bob |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: montreal, Canada
Posts: 337
|
This may be too obvious, but how certain are you that the straight edge really is straight ? Not that I know how one would check, mind you.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,538
|
Henry or Steve
Couldn't one check the case flatness by putting plastigage on the bearing saddles, torquing the case down and then checking the plastigage thickness for variation from saddle to saddle? Wouldn't this, combined with bore gage checks on the case bores and checking the crank rotation resistance with the bearings in place, be a good rough check for case flatness and line bore?
__________________
Tom Butler 1973 RSR Clone 1970 911E 914-6 GT Recreation in Process |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Quote:
That would be an indication. However, if the crank is straight, fine, but one would have to confirm that first. Then you'd have to discern whether any difference is due to improper oil clearance, case warpage or main bearing journal irregularity. Better a machined straight edge or a dial bore gauge inserted on-axis. Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cooperstown NY
Posts: 894
|
i used a machinists' straight edge, true to 0.0001".
i measured diagonals and straight across. i was surprized at the consistency and wondered if the case came from the factory that way. if you think about it, undersize at the saddles would make the perimeter "tighter". would this decrease the chance of an oil leak? just thinking out loud, still going to send it out. bob |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 74
|
Engine case straightness
I had a similar problem with a 1971 magnesium 911T case. Ground and polished the crank to perfection, fitted new oversize brgs and all was fine until the last 10 ft-lb's were applied to the main brg bolts; then, the crank locked tight. I tore it apart and re-assembled with plasti-guage to find a few brgs. (.0005") tight. I found it hard to believe that only that much made such a difference. I took everything out of the case, bolted it back together at specified torque settings, and took it to a NASCAR engine shop in NC, where they did a line-hone on the case for $300. This proceedure solved my problem, but the shiny surface pattern left by the hone on the dull grey bearing saddles surprised me. The 2 tight bearings had very little marking, while others had circular patterns at various locations. I think hundreds (or thousands) of heat-cool cycles on these old magnesium cases causes the metal to creep in strange ways, but probably not enough to justify milling the case halfs and line boring. Moral of the story: If you can find someone who does line-honing, make it a standard proceedure when rebuilding a magnesium case motor. The process removes so little metal, you can use standard bearing sizes.
69BahamaYellow |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: new zealand
Posts: 28
|
if you machine the case halves not only will it have to be line bored but the oil pump drive shaft will also need line boring go with bh yellow if you have a problem i put mine back together without even checking goes as good as new with its new bearings etc etc
Last edited by jsbc; 08-30-2007 at 12:49 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|