Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   911 Engine Rebuilding Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/)
-   -   3.2 upgrade help (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/451287-3-2-upgrade-help.html)

Dynamohum 01-14-2009 09:49 AM

3.2 upgrade help
 
I have a 3.2 motor ready to build up for fun occasional street & track use. I’m at a crossroad looking for advice on the best combination of displacement and cam upgrades that will work well with single plug Motronic on 94 octane?

No emission requirements, I can go with any combination on exhaust & chip. I currently have a SS single in, dual out aftermarket muffler The intake, intake runners, intake and exhaust ports have just been cleaned up of all casting imperfections and the case boat-tailed, all in anticipation of a displacement increase. Access to local machining is my greatest limitation so far, so for the most part I’m trying to do the majority as bolt on.
Using Stock crank and rods, with upgraded rod and head bolts.

Options that come to mind:

3.2 original P&C 9.3:1 cleaned up, mooned, new rings, and try hard to be happy with that. Feedback on perhaps leaving out the base shim rather than fly-cutting heads for small compression gain?

3.2 Euro 10.3:1 P&C, exhaust & chip recommendations?

3.4 Mahle Motorsport 9.8:1 P&C, single plug & stock cam, or performance cam, chip suggestions. Told expensive for marginal gain, anyone care to comment on this?

3:4 Nickies 98mm with JE pistons 10.5:1 single plug, compensating with ceramic coatings, water injection and or higher octane blending. Performance cam, chip & 1:3/4”headers

3.4 Nickies with JE pistons 10.5:1 dual plug and all the performance goodies.

What is the best bang for the buck? Anyone work out the most HP gain per $ spent?
Are there any options on modifying the Motronic to operate better with engine modifications? Perhaps substituting the airflow sensor?

safe 01-14-2009 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dynamohum (Post 4417430)
What is the best bang for the buck? Anyone work out the most HP gain per $ spent?

3.6 engine swap!

Non of your options above will beat it.

alniki 01-14-2009 04:31 PM

I'm in a similar situation and personally prefer "3.2 Euro 10.3:1 P&C with improved exhaust & matching chip if the P&C are not too expensive.

A 3.6 swap is tempting but expensive and would probably hurt the resale value unless you can find a right buyer. Just my 2 cents ;)

porschenut 01-14-2009 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dynamohum (Post 4417430)
What is the best bang for the buck?

Go with a stock 3.2 rebuild + chip/exhaust, and spend the savings on rebuilding your G50 with shorter gears.

Dynamohum 01-14-2009 06:25 PM

I would love to start with a 3.6, considered it at one time but that option is out of the picture now just to far down the slippery slope with this one, thanks.
My stock P&C are within spec, so that is the cheapest way out, but I'm looking for more power.
Yes looking at gearing and weight loss also, but back to the topic I really would like some input on the proposed builds.

The other option that I played with and did not mention earlier was building higher compression, low boost turbo motor. That would be lots of fun to drive but big gamble at the same time with single plug and Motronic. Also I want to maintain maximum low end torque for Autocross

alniki 01-14-2009 07:53 PM

Low boost turbo is not an economical option, IMHO, unless you get it pretty inexpensive. Guess you probably cannot get both low end torque and high end hp without resorting to high displacement.

BGCarrera32 01-14-2009 08:17 PM

I'm in the middle of a 3.2 rebuild myself.

>>3.4 Mahle Motorsport 9.8:1 P&C, single plug & stock cam, or performance cam, chip suggestions. Told expensive for marginal gain, anyone care to comment on this?

Keeping 9.5:1 standard compression, cylinders bored to 98mm (3.4 liter) and replated by EBS in Nevada
JE Pistons
964 Motronic cam grind, or you could do 20/21 Webcam grind
ARP rod bolts
upper and lower head studs in steel *gasp*
Updated Steve Wong chip (911chips.com)
cat bypass, dual out exhaust, standard heat exchangers

If you stay under 10:1 no need to twin plug with 98mm, but you're at the limit. 91 octane minimum.

And, twin plugging realistically adds a fair amount of expense between the dizzy, signal splitter, extra wires, extra coil, etc. ($1500+) Twin plugging is desirable, but recognize what it really costs before you go down that path.

With the setup I am doing I am told the gains are not huge, but a 10-12% bump in rwhp and torque can be expected. On my 2600lb Carrera I think that is significant for the money spent.

JohnJL 01-15-2009 12:36 AM

Honestly best bang for the buck might be to rebuild it with what you have (if everything is within spec) and turbo it. Especially if you have no emissions requirements.

safe 01-15-2009 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dynamohum (Post 4418412)
I would love to start with a 3.6, considered it at one time but that option is out of the picture now just to far down the slippery slope with this one, thanks.

Change MAF, exhaust, cam, and chip.

Any more new bits (like P&C) and you are not far from a 3.6 swap.

Dynamohum 01-15-2009 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by safe (Post 4418742)
Change MAF, exhaust, cam, and chip.

Any more new bits (like P&C) and you are not far from a 3.6 swap.

Yes in one sense your right "IF" this is all done to my 3.2 but consider that in doing a 3.6 swap I would still need the exhaust, chip, DME, wiring harness and everything else to do the conversion. These are all additional expenses over the cost of the motor and in the end I still have a used motor.
Thanks for your input but really I'm to far down this path now to to change directions.

Dynamohum 01-15-2009 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnJL (Post 4418730)
Honestly best bang for the buck might be to rebuild it with what you have (if everything is within spec) and turbo it. Especially if you have no emissions requirements.

I was thinking the same thing John. Many of my existing parts like intake plenum and heat exchangers are desirable upgrades to the turbos CIS fuel system. So in some ways going this route gives me a head start and reduces cost. I can also run my existing cams. I can place thicker shims under the jugs to drop the comp ratio a bit, still run the domed Motronic pistons with a single plug. The additional fuel requirements and combating detonation can be meet with the addition of a inexpensive water/alcohol system. For a measure of caution I could install a bung for a wide ban O2 sensor to read AF and measure exhaust temp. Apparently there is a sudden drop in combustion temp just prier to detonation. Can also add a stand alone knock sensor, with a warning light on the dash. These are relativity cheap systems to install and would add a measure of safety on any modified engine.
The boost requirements are minimal so even a K26 would do the trick.
Lots to consider and that is why I'm here to get all the feed- back I can get.
Thanks for every one's input

3.2 CAB 01-15-2009 08:48 AM

Does Paxton put out a unit for a 3.2? Which would give more effective performance, a root type blower, or a true turbo? Which would be more effective as far as power is concerned, and which would be more cost efficient to run? I have seen very little data on NOS systems for a 3.2, I believe the reason is that it is not really a sound way to achieve more power with the air-cooled 3.2 engine. I have built 3.0 liter V6 conventional type engines, and fabricated custom headers and added single or even dual stage systems with up to 150HP shot NOS systems for them, without problems, but I don't think the 3.2 would be a good candidate for that type of upgrade, but... maybe I am wrong in thinking that??? Any thoughts?? Good luck with it!! Tony.

Dynamohum 01-21-2009 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnJL (Post 4418730)
Honestly best bang for the buck might be to rebuild it with what you have (if everything is within spec) and turbo it. Especially if you have no emissions requirements.

Thanks for your input John,

I think your right, in the end its more bang for the $,, plus it opens up a much larger window for HP potential on future builds. HP is addicting and eventually we all want more, more, more! lol

After lots of research, internal debate and sleepless nights I have decided to go the Turbo route. No turning back now, ordered APR rod bolts, and head studs in preparation and a Dansk header.

JeremyD 01-22-2009 09:04 AM

My build - which I think was a good bang for the buck

3.4 mahle 9.8 to one jugs
~ 1MM taken out of pistons for valve pockets
Single plug
Magnecor Wires
extrude hone intake
993ss cams (Dougherty Racing Cams)
arp rod bolts
Supertech Head Studs
enlarged throttle body
competition springs and retainers (EBS)
993 Flipped Flange Heat Exchangers
MK 993 Bischof flange muffler
Steve Wong custom chip to pull it all together

911 tweaks 01-22-2009 01:04 PM

JeremyD... what did your set up wind up putting out for fwhp and or rwhp ??
I followed your build some time ago but I can't remember how it turned out.
Thanks for posting your build info! Anything you would of done differently reflecting back now ??
Bob

JeremyD 01-22-2009 01:35 PM

in signature - 244.3 rwhp

Steve W 01-24-2009 11:53 AM

No replacement for displacement. A single plug 3.4 at around 9.8-10.0 compression makes for a very nice strong motor.

Dynamohum 01-25-2009 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve W (Post 4440118)
No replacement for displacement. A single plug 3.4 at around 9.8-10.0 compression makes for a very nice strong motor.

Hi Steve,

I agree with you " No replacement for displacement " and this was my intended route.
After much consideration and internal debate, I'm converting and going Turbo.
There are no emission constraints.

What are the Dyno figures (high low window) that you’re seeing with a 3.2 conversion using stock cams, single plug head, headers, non-restrictive exhaust, intercooler, Motronic and your Turbo chips? At what compression ratio, boost pressure and fuel pressure? Is a cam upgrade beneficial while maintaining the Motronics?

I figure if I can get an idea of the Maximum obtainable HP attainable within the Limits of the Motronic, I can properly match the rest of the components and purchase the ideal turbo & intercooler.

My intentions are to use my old PC’s for now. I can shim to reduce the CR down to about 8.8/1 if it produces better results.. The engine is still apart so this is the time to do it and I’m open to suggestions.
The exhaust and intake ports and intake have been cleaned up for added flow.

Still debating the following:

Possibly coating the crowns and combustion chambers with ceramic.

Water/Alcohol injection.

Your input is much appreciated, Thanks Paul

safe 01-25-2009 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dynamohum (Post 4441836)
My intentions are to use my old PC’s for now. I can shim to reduce the CR down to about 8.8/1 if it produces better results..

I'm no engine expert, but adding shims will mess up the squish area. Bad for pre ignition control...

Steve W 01-25-2009 01:43 PM

having dealt with turbos for years, the constant tinkering, maintenance, heat, turbo lag, attention to operation, oil coking, proper shutdown procedures, discovering the limits of your hardware not designed for the torque (i.e. clutch, gears ... if you know what I mean) I just got tired of it all and guess you can say I prefer the 'no worries, no surprises' n/a instant response configuration. The fact that you're talking about intercoolers and alcohol injection has me thinking you're the type to head down the same path I did. No doubt, a turbo will have a engine deliver more torque and hp than you're going to get from a n/a motor, including a 3.6, but it's not as linear and instant, and if there's lag, especially from a single turbo, it can surprise you if the boost kicks in in the middle of a curve.

Have you driven a 3.6 transplant? A 993 motor in a lighter weight 911 body, with the shorter gears of the earlier trannys is scary brutal - like a giant 2-stroke motor.

Anyways as for options with respect to turbocharging the 3.2, have you looked in the 930 turbocharging forum. Lots of guys there who have BTDT, so check it out.

Dynamohum 01-25-2009 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by safe (Post 4441899)
I'm no engine expert, but adding shims will mess up the squish area. Bad for pre ignition control...

Hey safe,

Shimming is done at the cylinder base and yes it does marginally increase the total combustion area to decrease the compression ratio. To my knowledge the Motronic piston hump was designed to improve combustion efficiency thereby reducing emissions. Unlike other higher compression domed pistons it does not tend to divide the combustion area in two, but rather compensates for the plug location. That said I can see advantages running with the Motronic piston with a one plug set up, over other piston designs when running a low boost set up. Personally I don't see any pre-ignition issues.

34Carrera 01-30-2009 05:20 PM

Similar
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JeremyD (Post 4434765)
My build - which I think was a good bang for the buck

3.4 mahle 9.8 to one jugs
~ 1MM taken out of pistons for valve pockets
Single plug
Magnecor Wires
extrude hone intake
993ss cams (Dougherty Racing Cams)
arp rod bolts
Supertech Head Studs
enlarged throttle body
competition springs and retainers (EBS)
993 Flipped Flange Heat Exchangers
MK 993 Bischof flange muffler
Steve Wong custom chip to pull it all together

I did something similar:

Valve guides - what started it all :)
3.4 mahle 9.8
Ported the cylinder heads
Extrude hone intake
Boat-tailed the case
Performance cams
ARP rod bolts
Enlarged throttle body
Mass airflow sensor & custom chip
Jerry Woods valve springs and retainers
Bursch muffler

It pulls really hard now (harder then the 87 turbo)

Dynamohum 01-30-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 34Carrera (Post 4455014)
I did something similar:

Valve guides - what started it all :)

Ditto, same here it all started with doing the valve guides!
At first it was just going to be a stock build, but then you get in there and think well I might as well do a bit more to it while were in here. Next thing you know your hooked! :)

Today I ordered Thermal Barrier Coatings and Dry Film Lubricants!
Man this is a lot of fun but so addicting once you get started.

I like your build, what chip are you using?

quint22cp 01-30-2009 11:03 PM

Ditto, Ditto, same here it all started with doing the valve guides!

Then I really got carried away :eek:

Spec:-

3.5L Nickies
10.5:1 ceramic coated JE pistons
Twin plugged (did my own machining)
DC20 cams
Large throttle body
32lb injectors
Dumped "barn door" air mass meter
Fitted SDS engine management system
Six coil direct fire ignition with Magnacor leads
SSI headers
Dansk 2 in 2 out SS exhaust (loud)

265 - 277 flywheel BHP:)


Why the variation in BHP? It depends which dyno shop you go to.

It pulls like a train and has good throttle response, but I am still uncertain about those injectors, I feel that they don't atomize properly and I could get more out of this set up.

Paul, if you can stretch to it you should go twin plug it seems to make a considerable difference to my motor. The ignition advance on my motor has come down to 24deg BTDC and if I pull the coils for the second set of plugs it won't tick over so it clearly has an effect on combustion efficiency.

good luck with your rebuild, Pete

cgarr 01-31-2009 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dynamohum (Post 4417430)
What is the best bang for the buck?

To be honest, the best bang for the buck is to just loose weight, that helps everywhere.

Dynamohum 01-31-2009 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cgarr (Post 4455708)
To be honest, the best bang for the buck is to just loose weight, that helps everywhere.

For sure Weight to HP is everything.

I'm putting her on a diet!!!! The following is coming out
A/C, compressor, mounting, etc, no use for it, power robbing dead weight.
Cat, heat exchangers, engine mounted blower motor for heating system,
heavy muffler, Its my summer toy who needs heat anyway.
Cruise control, never use it,

I'm sure this list will grow! :)

Dynamohum 01-31-2009 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quint22cp (Post 4455484)
Ditto, Ditto, same here it all started with doing the valve guides!

Then I really got carried away :eek:

Spec:-

3.5L Nickies
10.5:1 ceramic coated JE pistons
Twin plugged (did my own machining)
DC20 cams
Large throttle body
32lb injectors
Dumped "barn door" air mass meter
Fitted SDS engine management system
Six coil direct fire ignition with Magnacor leads
SSI headers
Dansk 2 in 2 out SS exhaust (loud)

265 - 277 flywheel BHP:)


Why the variation in BHP? It depends which dyno shop you go to.

It pulls like a train and has good throttle response, but I am still uncertain about those injectors, I feel that they don't atomize properly and I could get more out of this set up.

Paul, if you can stretch to it you should go twin plug it seems to make a considerable difference to my motor. The ignition advance on my motor has come down to 24deg BTDC and if I pull the coils for the second set of plugs it won't tick over so it clearly has an effect on combustion efficiency.

good luck with your rebuild, Pete

Thanks for you input Pete, Excellent build! Very nice, love what you have done!!
I'm interested in learning more about your ignition set up.

Re: your fueling needs. What is your injector rail fuel pressure at? Lots of guys doing 3.2 turbo conversions are running a variable rate pressure reg with the stock injectors into the 400 HP range, or with your set up probably a 3bar reg would do the trick if your injectors are still spraying a good pattern.
What are you’re A/F at now, do you have a wide band O2 and a data log?
I see your running with Ceramic pistons, from what I’m reading this means you’re A/F ratios can run leaner and near the optimum range for max HP.
I’m also concerned about running the injectors beyond there capacity and looking into Water alcohol injection for charge cooling, eliminating pre-ignition ,lowering detonation threshold and providing supplementary fueling.

Check these guys out http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/waterinjection.html

I see you machined in your 2nd plugs, What were the angels used? I'm considering doing my own also, for future use.
This time around I sticking with the motronic dome piston and it will not work with the 2nd plug, the hump is right where the 2nd plug goes. I'm ceramic coating the pistons and combustion chambers myself with CBC2 Powerkote, according to them you can run up to 13.5/1 CP with up 1bar boost with this product. The advantage of CBC2 over CBX is that you can polish it, to further improve flow and reduce detonation threshold. So for my high CP low boost application it was the better choice

Here is a link to the coating mfg http://www.techlinecoatings.com/BulkEngine.htm

Hope to learn more about your step up, thanks again Paul

Dynamohum 01-31-2009 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quint22cp (Post 4455484)
Ditto, Ditto, same here it all started with doing the valve guides!

Then I really got carried away :eek:

Spec:-

3.5L Nickies
10.5:1 ceramic coated JE pistons
Twin plugged (did my own machining)
DC20 cams
Large throttle body
32lb injectors

It pulls like a train and has good throttle response, but I am still uncertain about those injectors, I feel that they don't atomize properly and I could get more out of this set up.

Pete try searching on the turbo forums for injector info. This is some of whats over there, hope it helps Paul

Posted by mlhm5
*500cc per minute is approximately equal to 49lbs per hour which is equal to approximately 100hp.
* lbs/hour = cc per minute / 10.5
* lbs per hour = HP / 2.04
* cc per minute = lbs per hour x 10.5
* cc per minute = HP x 5
* HP = cc per minute / 5
* HP = lbs per hour x 2.04



Injectors Speedy Squirrel
Type: Siemans DEKA VI
Flow: 4.8 to 5.0 gm/s static flow at 300 kPa
Tip: Extra Extended Tip (17.5mm)
Spray: Pencil type, no bend

For a comparison, the stock k-jectronic injectors are flowing around 3.9 gm/s at 300hp(flywheel)@5500 RPM.

The formula I use for sizing injectors is:

Flow (gm/s) = (target flywheel HP)*0.0790/(number of cylinders)

I was shooting for around 400HP at the flywheel, so that comes out to 5.2 gm/s, which is how I arrived at my injector size.

For 650HP at the flywheel, you get 8.55 gm/s (67.7 lb/hr), so the injector size depends on how much power you want.

Be realistic! Bigger is not better. The reason is that a large flowing injector performs very poorly at idle. The pulsewidth becomes so small that the injector can't handle it. Rather than spraying in a small amount of fuel, it just shuts off.

65 lb/hr is probably the biggest that most people on this board will need. 85 is ay too big, unless you're making over 800HP at the flywheel.

Nothing wrong with designing to run at 100% duty cycle at max power. That's when the injector is running the best! Flow is not interrupted, just one big garden hose of fuel spraying in.

Pay attention to the spray pattern. All injectors are NOT the same. Most multi-intake valve engines actually have two narrow sprays coming out of one injector. Put those in our motor and you have two narrow sprays onto the port walls. Not Good!

quint22cp 02-01-2009 11:00 PM

Hi Paul,

Firstly the ignition set up is two banks of 3 coils. These are the double ended type that fire two plugs at the same time, (one is a wasted spark). I connected one bank to all the original plugs (top plugs) and the other bank to all the bottom plugs. Doing it this way I can turn off the top or bottom plugs by pulling a fuse to test that the plugs are firing. After my rebuild I was still running the original Motronic OEM engine management system and then I introduced the SDS engine management a stage at a time to check all was working as it should be. ( I can expand on this if anyone is going the same route). If you want a look at this coil set up there are details in the tech' manuals on the SDS site (www.sdsefi.com)

I did all the machining for the second plug myself, all the details are on these pelican forums this is where I got my angles from. I will have a dig around all my old links and post it.

I'm using the stock fuel pump and regulator and therefore stock fuel pressure. My tick over is just fine with the injectors I'm using http://www.racetronix.com/621020.html it's just that before I installed them I did a spray pattern test of the Porsche stock injector against the new one and the original seem to have a better pattern, less of a pencil flow. Not sure what if any effect this has. I have asked this question on here but had no good feedback yet.

Yes I do have a AF ratio meter, it is a WMS one and I think it's a pile of junk. It seems to be displaying the right ratios, if it can be believed, but it leaps around all over the place. Just purchased a new Innovate one with an analogue dial I hope this one is better.

Good luck with the rebuild Paul.

Pete

34Carrera 02-02-2009 07:15 AM

Chip
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dynamohum (Post 4455109)
Ditto, same here it all started with doing the valve guides!
At first it was just going to be a stock build, but then you get in there and think well I might as well do a bit more to it while were in here. Next thing you know your hooked! :)

Today I ordered Thermal Barrier Coatings and Dry Film Lubricants!
Man this is a lot of fun but so addicting once you get started.

I like your build, what chip are you using?

I have an Autothority MAF and the chip came with it customized for my build. Eventually I need to get together with Steve Wong and see what can be improved.

mxessin2 02-02-2009 10:39 AM

Bang for the Buck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233603508.jpg

911 tweaks 02-02-2009 03:50 PM

looks like hot and cold something goin' into that intake... maybe nos or a liquid ??

We need more info on this set up please... also maybe a utube sound clip of that motor in action??
Bob

Dynamohum 02-05-2009 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mxessin2 (Post 4459881)

Very nice Nitrous set up, very clean installation and yes your right great bang for the buck.
Where I live Nitrous systems have been outlawed to combat Street Racing :(
They are nasty here, heavy fines, impounding your car plus towing and storage etc.

So its not an option I would want to go with, besides I'm hooked on the turbo bug now.

Turbo Header arrived by Mail the other day, so no turning back now

mxessin2 02-05-2009 03:08 PM

Bob - I will make a Utube Video with the simple setup and sound clip for the curious minded.

Paul - I don't know if Oklahoma has a law on Nitrous. I have run Nitrous on this car for 10 years now. I will take the 5th if I get pulled over lol… The Turbo set up you are going with will come with a kewl Turbo whirling sound too! I hope to see some pictures of the build.
:cool:

Dynamohum 02-05-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mxessin2 (Post 4467201)
Bob - I will make a Utube Video with the simple setup and sound clip for the curious minded.

Paul - I don't know if Oklahoma has a law on Nitrous. I have run Nitrous on his car for 10 years now. I will take the 5th if I get pulled over lol… The Turbo set up you are going with will come with a kewl Turbo whirling sound too! I hope to see some pictures of the build.
:cool:

I Bet she dances when you giver a good shot! Instant Boost & "0" lag!!!

Looking forward to seeing your Video. and hopefully without you taking the 5th.


I don't have much yet but will try to get some photos up as the build progresses.

Dynamohum 02-06-2009 08:47 AM

A few Photos to share the Love

Sexy shot of OBX Header
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233941312.jpg

Case Boat-tailed
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233941501.jpg

Preparing pistons (abrading crown for Ceramic TBC)
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233941791.jpg

Abrading (sand blasting back sides) increasing surface area for cooling.
Pistons will be weight adjusted by this method after TBC applied to crowns to insure all pistons are within weight spec.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233942200.jpg

All critical areas are taped off
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233942291.jpg

Then blasted

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233942351.jpg

Dynamohum 02-06-2009 09:21 AM

A few more Photos, sorry about the quality.

Please no worries, I'm anal when it comes to cleaning internal parts. The pistons will be, blown with 175 psi of compressed air between careful cleaning with a stiff tooth brush, then put in the dishwasher for a couple of wash cycles (when the Miss's is not home) to insure any imbedded sand is released, before assembly.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233943023.jpg

Shot of ports clean up of casting imperfections.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233943133.jpg

DIY valve guides: Reaming the guides to size.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233943301.jpg

Checking guide to valve seat concentricity.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233943415.jpg

Hey it fits and no more wobble.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233943464.jpg

Another shot of the intake port after clean up, Labor of Love doing that job.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1233943950.jpg

Enjoy, thanks for your interest's and feedback on my build.

I will post more as they come, and hopefully they will better quality.:)

mxessin2 02-06-2009 05:20 PM

WOw this is kewl!!
Good job on the sand blasting.
Ok I am trying to keep a shopping list here..
You put new valve guides in?
And the chrome headers Rock! http://forums.pelicanparts.com/suppo...leys/2ar15.gif[img]

Dynamohum 02-06-2009 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mxessin2 (Post 4469800)
WOw this is kewl!!
Good job on the sand blasting.
Ok I am trying to keep a shopping list here..
You put new valve guides in?
And the chrome headers Rock! http://forums.pelicanparts.com/suppo...leys/2ar15.gif[img]

Yes put in my own guides, installed first oversize, purchased from our Host.

I went to 2 local shops, no one in the area had the tooling or any Porsche experience. After hearing of shipping nightmare stories and heads destroyed I did not want to chance shipping them. So in the end I worked an arrangement with a shop were they would grind the valves and seats for me but I would R&R the guides.
Figured the cost of the reamer and pilot works out to be about the same as the shipping would of been anyway. Besides I'm a hands on guy that likes to get into everything. This also allowed me to clean up the ports while the guides were out. I decide I wanted to try out some coatings in my build so I'm going to Ceramic coat the combustion chambers and exhaust port prier to reassembly.

Dynamohum 02-16-2009 03:44 PM

More photos

Piston taped up ready for application of Ceramic coating, note large black O ring used to seal off top ring grove.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1234830882.jpg


and here we have a fresh batch of Coated pistons Hot out of the Oven
(they were post cured at 350deg/f for 1hour and gradually cooled before taken out.
I picked up a used stove from our local salvage yard and hooked it up in the garage.


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1234831294.jpg

Hot out of the oven, oh they look so good.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1234831405.jpg


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.