Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 45
Garage
Lightbulb Need your expert opinion on different alternatives to motor setup

Hi

I am going to overhaul my engine. I have a Porsche 911 from 1980 with the stock 180HK. Since I am doing this costly measure I hope to do some simple modifications to drain some extra HK from the engine.

I am considering to different alternatives and this is where i need the expertise from you pelican guys!!

Option 1: Change the 3.0L cylinder and piston set for a 3.2L bolt on cylinder and piston set. And then combine this with a SSI exhaust.

Option 2: If i have the Nikasil cylinders! Then change the original pistons with JE pistons with 10.5 comp. Combine the JE pistons with 964 cams. Also here mount an SSI exhaust. To meet the new high comp I am thinking about installing an MDS unit to gain more spark.

So I need somee feedback on what you guys think about the different options. Also if someeone have done the option 2? Do you think this is to high a comp? Do you think the JE piston will work with the 964 cams?

And finally do option 1 or 2 give the most boost out of the engine?

I hope you guys have somee good answers for me!!!

Thank you!


Last edited by 911-lightning; 10-08-2012 at 12:08 PM..
Old 10-08-2012, 11:00 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,502
I dont see what option 1 does as a benefit
Bruce
Old 10-08-2012, 11:17 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,551
Option 1 will give an extra 20 - 25 HP and more low end torque. I would also think about having the cams reground to a 964 profile.

Option 2 will require twin plugging, a switch to carbs or MFI/EFI, a more aggressive cam than 964 and will get very expensive. You can get close to 280 HP with this option depending on cams and headwork

Last edited by tom1394racing; 10-08-2012 at 12:00 PM..
Old 10-08-2012, 11:51 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 45
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flat6pac View Post
I dont see what option 1 does as a benefit
Bruce
So you say that changing the volume to 3.2 to get a greater displacement and a higher comp ratio will not do anything for the power??
Guess I am left with only one option then?
Old 10-08-2012, 11:58 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 45
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom1394racing View Post
Option 1 will give an extra 20 - 25 HP and more low end torque. I would also think about having the cams regrou d to a 964 profile.

Option 2 will require twin plugging, a switch to carbs or MFI/EFI, a more aggressive cam than 964 and will get very expensive
So if I go with the 9.8 comp instead I could drop the carbs right? I am reading the Wayne R Dempsey "How to rebuild and modify". There it says that you could use the 9.8 piston with 964 cam and the SSI exhaust. The given power increase is between 30-50HP. Is this realistic in your eyes?

Last edited by 911-lightning; 10-08-2012 at 12:09 PM..
Old 10-08-2012, 12:04 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,551
The displacement increase to 3.2 is good for about 7% increase in power. Let's call it 12 HP The increased CR will add a couple more say 15 total. The SSI's will be good for another 15 and the 964 cams maybe 5 HP
So you have a total of maybe 35 or so increased HP
Old 10-08-2012, 12:30 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,502
You havent added the 3.2 crank and rods, on a 3.0, adding 3,2 pistons doesnt do anything except lower the 3.2 compression and add machine work to the 3.0 rods.
Bruce
Old 10-08-2012, 01:50 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
356RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,333
Garage
I think what Bruce is trying to get across is that the 3.0 and 3.2 both have a 95mm piston bore. The difference in the 3.0 and 3.2 was a stroke change from 70.4 to a 74.4.
__________________
Mark Jung
Bend, OR
MFI Werks.com
Old 10-08-2012, 02:09 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,551
I assumed he meant the 3.2 short stroke (ie 98 mm P&C's).
__________________
Tom Butler
1973 RSR Clone
1970 911E
914-6 GT Recreation in Process
Old 10-08-2012, 04:06 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 45
Garage
Yes, sorry for the confusion! I meant the 3.2 P/C conversion when you increase the bore to 98mm.
Old 10-08-2012, 11:25 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 8
Garage
Hi,
I am in the same boat. I bought a non-running '79 real cheap thinking it would start right up after I fixed the fuel leak... two weeks later and I find 7 broken exh studs and a few rusty valves. So, total rebuild in my future. CIS is not looking to be in good shape so new EFI (or carbs). It came with PermaTune ignition. not sure if this works either.
I was thinking about swapping in a good used 3.2. Now, I'm not sure. A rebuilt 3.0 w/ new EFI and MSD(?) would be better then a stock 3.2 I'm thinking.

Will you keep CIS?? What is your budget?

Andrew

Old 10-17-2012, 08:41 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.