Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 102
930/16 Cam Timing Questions for the Experts

Here is a brief background:

About a year ago I bought a running 930/16 motor with good compression from a wrecked '83 911SC. It will be converted to run 40IDA Webers and headers and then will be installed in my '72. Before the Weber conversion, I'm doing a light refresh on the motor. In terms of "light refresh" I'm referring cleaning, resealing common oil leaks, valve adjustment, upgrade to Carrera chain tensioners, and general maintenance such as alternator belt and ignition (plugs, wires, cap, rotor).

I'm presently in the process of doing the Carrera tensioners. After reading Wayne's "How to Rebuild your 911 Engine" book, I'm sensitive to verifying that the cam timing is correct before proceeding. So, I decided to check the "Intake Valve Lift at overlap TDC with 0.1mm (0.004-in) valve clearance." I followed the process in the book to check the left and right sides of the motor.

I repeated the process several times and got consistent results. Both side are measuring the same at 0.9mm (0.035-in). Incidentally, this appears correct (albeit on the low side) for a 930/10 motor. However, Wayne's book indicates that Intake Valve Overlap for a 930/16 motor (my motor) should be 1.4 - 1.7mm (0.055 - 0.067-in).

So, finally to my questions for the experts...
Is it OK to run my motor with the smaller Intake Valve Overlap of the 930/10 motor?
Is there a reason that someone might have done this intentionally?


Thanks!

__________________
1972 911T/S Coupe Project
1978 911SC
1988 944 Turbo
Old 12-27-2014, 05:28 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,104
I just did the timing on my SC motor yesterday, but i'm using DC60 cams and my values were different. I'm not going to comment on if your car is fine to run with slightly retarded timing, but will ask why do you plan to run CIS cams with the Webers? Seems like a great time to install something new.
Old 12-28-2014, 04:52 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,481
SC and Carrera are all the same cams
Spec on the cams from the factory. Change according to application, compression rating, and use on the road.
The set of .9 mm on a 930/10. Makes more power at the higher RPNs.
The 930/16 is a 9.3 cr with a setting of 1.7, giving more response light to light.
As soon as you get rid of the wave piston surface the cam can work out as far as 2.5 I think

Bruce
Old 12-28-2014, 06:46 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 102
@3literpwer: point taken and I'm definitely going to consider a cam change. At the moment I'm anxious to get the motor in the 72 and start shaking it down. Was just trying to avoid the slippery slope but you're right that now is a good time to consider the change. I also associate cam changes with piston changes. If I'm not changing the pistons, is there still power to be unlocked with a different cam in concert with the Webers?

@Bruce: So if I'm understanding, shorter Intake Valve Overlap shifts power to the higher RPMs? Or said a different way, retarded cam timing provides more power at higher RPMs?

Sounds like there are no issues running the motor the way it is. I suppose if anything it's "safer" that at TDC the valve is slightly further away from the piston.

Thanks guys for your input
__________________
1972 911T/S Coupe Project
1978 911SC
1988 944 Turbo
Old 12-28-2014, 10:35 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 102
@3literpwer: point taken and I'm definitely going to consider a cam change. At the moment I'm anxious to get the motor in the 72 and start shaking it down. Was just trying to avoid the slippery slope but you're right that now is a good time to consider the change. I also associate cam changes with piston changes. If I'm not changing the pistons, is there still power to be unlocked with a different cam in concert with the Webers?

@Bruce: So if I'm understanding, shorter Intake Valve Overlap shifts power to the higher RPMs? Or said a different way, retarded cam timing provides more power at higher RPMs?

Sounds like there are no issues running the motor the way it is. I suppose if anything it's "safer" that at TDC the valve is slightly further away from the piston.

Thanks guys for your input
__________________
1972 911T/S Coupe Project
1978 911SC
1988 944 Turbo
Old 12-28-2014, 10:36 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,230
Isn't the exhaust valve closer?
Old 12-28-2014, 11:06 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 102
chis_seven, based on figure 7-14 in Wayne's book my understanding is the that intake and exhaust valve lift is equivalent at TDC overlap.
__________________
1972 911T/S Coupe Project
1978 911SC
1988 944 Turbo
Old 12-28-2014, 12:12 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,230
Here is an old thread which I hope explains.


Piston to Valve Clearance Explained (Excel Graph)
Old 12-28-2014, 02:14 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 102
chris_seven, thanks for cool thread link - very helpful

__________________
1972 911T/S Coupe Project
1978 911SC
1988 944 Turbo
Old 12-28-2014, 07:17 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.