![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
Perpetual Reassembler
|
3.0L Piston to Cylinder Clearances with JE Pistons + Replated Alusil Cylinders
I am about to send my 3.0L KS Alusil cylinders to be replated with Nikasil. I will be running JE pistons #274048 (9.5:1 compression)
PORSCHE - PORSCHE 911 (Sport Compact Section) - JE Pistons What kind of piston to cylinder clearances should I be targeting? Below are the clearances listed in the Bentley but since I will have aftermarket pistons with modified OE cylinders I dont know which, if any, should apply. Thanks in advance.
__________________
Jose - 1983 911SC Coupe Instagram: @joe_engineer 911 D I Y Blog: joe-engineer d o t c o m D I Y Vids: https://www.youtube.com/joeengineer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,176
|
Usually what you do in this case is send one piston off to the plater. I assume you are using US Chrome or Millennium; either one will have you fill out a sheet with what you are looking at, turbo or NA, and the bores will come back right.
In probably a dozen rebuilds I have never actually checked with the plater as to what the bore size is; they know what the standard piston to bore clearance is and adjust accordingly based on the piston you send them. I wouldn't overthink it. |
||
![]() |
|
abit off center
|
Mine were .0015 with j&e's
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
______________________ Craig G2Performance Twinplug, head work, case savers, rockers arms, etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Perpetual Reassembler
|
Quote:
I am sending one of my JE pistons along for the ride, should they need it. I hope you right about not overthinking it. In a world of "well you didnt specify what they should be" or "you didnt tell us thats what you wanted" I figured I would cross my T's and dot my I's. I do trust the folks at EBS though. ![]()
__________________
Jose - 1983 911SC Coupe Instagram: @joe_engineer 911 D I Y Blog: joe-engineer d o t c o m D I Y Vids: https://www.youtube.com/joeengineer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,176
|
EBS Sends them to millennium, so they will be done 100% correct if you send your piston along with. Barring some special order or instruction from you, they will do it the way they do the thousands of other cylinders they do. Never had a problem with them.
|
||
![]() |
|
Perpetual Reassembler
|
This is very reassuring. Thanks so much for the feedback!
__________________
Jose - 1983 911SC Coupe Instagram: @joe_engineer 911 D I Y Blog: joe-engineer d o t c o m D I Y Vids: https://www.youtube.com/joeengineer Last edited by 2jmotorsports; 05-25-2017 at 01:25 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Just did the same thing a few months ago, except they provided the JE pistons as well. They came out great. They know exactly what to do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Matt. 83 911SC 85.5 944 NA - Sold |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 174
|
|||
![]() |
|
abit off center
|
Which ever was the older about 2005 the new may be tighter?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
______________________ Craig G2Performance Twinplug, head work, case savers, rockers arms, etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Puny Bird
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Port Hope (near Toronto) On, Canada
Posts: 4,566
|
Don't even look at the Porsche Mahle specs, different material and they run a much tighter spec.
In comparison JE's are sloppy till they get a bit of heat into them.
__________________
'74 Porsche 914, 3.0/6 '72 Porsche 914, 1.7, wife's summer DD '67 Bug, 2600cc T4,'67 Bus, 2.0 T1 Not putting miles on your car is like not having sex with your girlfriend, so she'll be more desirable to her next boyfriend. |
||
![]() |
|
Perpetual Reassembler
|
Quote:
On their site they claim "The ring grooves are precision CNC machined for OEM style rings". But if the pistons will behave differently than OE then Im thinking I should run the rings that were designed specifically for them.
__________________
Jose - 1983 911SC Coupe Instagram: @joe_engineer 911 D I Y Blog: joe-engineer d o t c o m D I Y Vids: https://www.youtube.com/joeengineer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 174
|
Some advice to add to the advice already given. If in doubt, ask!!!!
First, identify the material the pistons are made from. I think 2681. This typically requires you to run + 0.003" clearances. I would think 0.003" would be the minimum and air cooled application probably requires another +.001- 0.002". If this is a race engine you may want more. Call JE and ask. If the piston is guided differently, you can go tighter but error on the safe side until you have some running time on the engine. Expect the piston to make some minor noise on start up. Normal. This can be helped by running an offset pin, but you may have your pistons already. Check to make sure where the pin center line is and if offset, make sure you get then orientated the right way for each side of the engine. Also make sure you have the correct ring face coatings on the rings. I am not sure if the original Alusil can run a different face coating to Nikasil? The rings if supplied with the pistons would have being supplied based on what you told whomever you bought the pistons from, what cylinder coating you are using. Hopefully. Just remember, no chrome with Nikasil. Also make sure you tell the cylinder repair place what the final surface roughness you want. You should be aiming for around RA4 - RA8 max. Often they come as much as RA 12. This will wear the rings a lot faster and cause other issues as well. As for what JE say about the ring grooves machined for OE rings, I would think this is both side and back clearance dimensions for the OE ring sizes. Make sure you fit the rings the correct way (up or down) if they are tapered faced. I suggest you ask or make sure you have a Napier 2nd. This will help additionally with the oil control. |
||
![]() |
|
Under the radar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
|
According to JE the piston to cylinder clearance should be 0.0015" for 3,0 w/ 9:5 to 1 cr.
![]()
__________________
Gordon ___________________________________ '71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed #56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 174
|
That tight a clearance is typical of 4032 material. If you can run as tight as that with 2618, and have no scuffing issues, that's great.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northeast
Posts: 464
|
I think it's important to keep in mind that although clearance varies with piston alloys
one needs to remember that aluminum cylinders also expand hence tighter than "normal" is in fact "normal" for air cooled engines.
__________________
Mark www.exotechpower.com 1981 Targa-messed with. 91 C2 supercharged track rat Radical Prosport-irritates the GT3 guys 40 years of rebuilding services |
||
![]() |
|
Perpetual Reassembler
|
Thanks for the feedback everyone. Especially for that JE spec sheet!
__________________
Jose - 1983 911SC Coupe Instagram: @joe_engineer 911 D I Y Blog: joe-engineer d o t c o m D I Y Vids: https://www.youtube.com/joeengineer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 636
|
I did this with my brothers 3.0 rebuild using the same part # pistons. The cylinders were sent to EBS and I also sent the JE spec sheet along as well. It all came out perfect and fit well. I've yet to install the heads but should have them back and on by mid summer.
|
||
![]() |
|