![]() |
A 28mm lens is hardly a fish eye lens in my book.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541186328.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Note that I’d still happily drive a 997 or earlier assuming I could find something reasonably priced. The new ones just aren’t appealing, ESPECIALLY for the money. |
Quote:
This is a super cool link with some original prices for 356s over the years. And yes, the 4 cam speedster was the cheapest of the 4 cam cars. 356 Porsche Price Lists You've also got to think about, back then, all of the cars were hand assembled, so leaving stuff off of the car actually did make the car cheaper (less stuff and less time to assemble it). These days when everything is done on an assembly line, putting out a few odd cars that are different from the majority, actually does cost the company more to make because they have to make new items in small batches and separate these items from the rest and probably mostly hand assemble them. |
Nice, but I might as well be looking at pictures of super models.
I can't have either. :D |
Quote:
|
You know, it really does boil down to what you like and what's important to you. A long time buddy & I usually get together after Cindy & I get done playing pool, the 3 of us going out for a bite.
Marty is a bit older than I, owns 32 residential rental properties in the Salem area, all paid for. On paper, I'm sure he's quite successful. He still has his '58 Speedster, a TTOD car during his autocross days...late 60's, early 70's. I haven't seen the car in years...it's stored somewhere. Marty's only "driver" is an early 90's Toyota Tacoma. Last night, he asked if I'd rather have Jim's $100,000 Ferrari or his $300,000 Speedster. Jim being a friend of Marty's I've never met who recently bought a Ferrari I've never seen, so don't ask me the model..I don't remember. I answered that I didn't want either of them. I wanted a car like I had...one yielding decent performance over the roads I drive. One that would take us comfortably over both 2 lane blacktop and a crowded I-5 during a wet rainy day and that is not so valuable that I'd be afraid of leaving in unattended while I'm inside a pool hall, enjoying some time knocking balls around. I also didn't want a car that is a hassle to care for. Hey, nobody is right or wrong here. Marty has made his life (and car) choices. So has his friend Jim, and so have I. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
2011 2011 Porsche Boxster Spyder https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2011-porsche-boxster-spyder-short-take-road-test http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541200541.jpg 2019 Porsche Boxster Spyder https://www.porsche.com/microsite/boxster-spyder/usa.aspx#/ http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541200541.jpg Compared to the new 911 Speedster I know which one I would take..................goes without saying..........also goes without saying which one Porsche will make more money on. James Dean 1955 Porsche 356 Super Speedster http://jakescarworld.blogspot.com/2012/11/james-dean.html http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541200971.jpg Quote:
|
Quote:
"With the Spyder, you pay more for less of everything except performance. It’s a marketing cow Porsche has milked many times, usually to enthralling effect. The metamorphosis from $58,950 Boxster S to $62,150 Boxster Spyder happens thusly: The power top is gutted, along with about 200 pounds. The roof is a canvas handkerchief that looks like it came off the Victoria’s Secret XXL rack. It hooks to the windscreen header and snaps to the roll hoops. " 2019 Porsche Boxster Spyder https://www.porsche.com/microsite/boxster-spyder/usa.aspx#/ http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541200541.jpg Compared to the new 911 Speedster I know which one I would take..................goes without saying..........also goes without saying which one Porsche will make more money on. James Dean 1955 Porsche 356 Super Speedster Jake's Car World: James Dean: Porsche 356 Super Speedster http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541200971.jpg[/QUOTE] Don't forget the 2015/16 Spyder 2015/16 Spyder had the GT4 3.8L https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/porsche/boxster/38-spyder-2dr/first-drive |
Quote:
"With the Spyder, you pay more for less of everything except performance. It’s a marketing cow Porsche has milked many times, usually to enthralling effect. The metamorphosis from $58,950 Boxster S to $62,150 Boxster Spyder happens thusly: The power top is gutted, along with about 200 pounds. The roof is a canvas handkerchief that looks like it came off the Victoria’s Secret XXL rack. It hooks to the windscreen header and snaps to the roll hoops. " Quote:
2015/16 Spyder like the GT4 had the 3.8L from the Carrera S with 370hp. https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/porsche/boxster/38-spyder-2dr/first-drive http://autowpaper.com/images/porsche...der-2015-1.jpg |
Quote:
If the red one looks like a tank, then the black one looks like a soap box derby, car. |
Quote:
From that link: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541246444.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541246444.jpg Quote:
|
Really the Boxster Spyder is closer to the essence of what the original Speedster was. Lighter weight, low options count, higher performance. The Spyder has been frequently referred to as Porsche’s best driver’s car, probably why even the 987 based models aren’t cheap. Walter Rohl has one as a personal car, that says something.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website