![]() |
What a hoot!
I misnamed:Mr. Higgins. MIke Higgins was a guy who lived across the hall 46 years ago. Sorry, Jeff. Seriously though, you could have made the last post without the architect crack. You're better than that. Best Les |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The ones I do not help either do not need it, or are lost causes. You go work for free and tell me how that works out for you. Many other architects on this board don't speak up for that reason, and it's a good one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Figure 1. North America – motor vehicle industry footprint, 2010 http://revel.unice.fr/eriep/index.html?id=3369 http://revel.unice.fr/eriep/docannex...3369/img-1.png Most of the North American automobile plants have figured out how to achieve quality despite regional differences. Maybe instead of the automobile companies borrowing executives from Boeing, Boeing should be recruiting from the automobile industry? Just a thought. |
Quote:
Kach, it's pretty obvious by now that you are one of the least respected members of this forum. Bald faced lies such as this, and childish accusations of "he started it!", only serve to further cement your position. Don't you ever get tired of this? |
I worked at SCAB (lol) for a few years when the home building industry was in the crapper. I ran the Brotje machine in the 19 bldg.
Although there were some good workers, there were a lot of people (and managers!) that didn’t need to be there. Or anywhere. I saw stoopid **** happen all the time. Some friends and I used to joke that the 787 must be really over engineered to fly with all the mistakes that happened. The funny thing was management wanted the plane moving down the line no matter how many jobs were not done. We moved it ahead of schedule! Yay! :rolleyes: My neighbor works on the flight line. Smart guy with all the certs and education. He hates it. A friend with 25 years on the flight line in the Air Force said the same thing. I got out as soon as I could to go back to building homes and hope I never have to fly on a 787. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Anyone can go back and check this thread, lairs get no respect from me. They might get a laugh out of me, but no respect. |
Quote:
Once you know how the sausage is made it sort of changes you. The Boeing 737 MAX Is 1 Step Closer to Flying Again -- but Don't Expect to See It Soon Airlines are removing the Boeing 737 MAX from their summer schedules, even as Boeing continues to make progress towards getting its most important jet family back in the air. https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/04/20/boeing-737-max-is-1-step-closer-to-flying-again.aspx Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Face it, knucklehead, nobody here respects you. Nobody. |
Quote:
My only failure is that I took the bait this time. Javadog, you also seem to have some sort of obsession with me. Please get over it, it isn't good for your health. Now back on topic............the 737. Another case of Boeing milking an old product while Airbus produces a new one? Mar 16, 2018 Boeing’s “Cash Cow” milks out its 10,000th plane https://www.airlinereporter.com/2018/03/boeings-cash-cow-milks-out-its-10000th-plane/ Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
We had the same stories from the UNION mechanics and assemblers in Schenectady as you have in Everette. If there is an issue of low quality, it is a management/plant culture issue, not a worker issue. |
If everyone ignored the troll and did not respond, he would eventually end up talking to himself.
That would get old. I don't even talk to myself anymore, I don't care for his attitude ;) |
Quote:
I agree on the feeding the trolls, Sammy. Has ruined many good threads here. |
I always talk to myself, but always lose the argument.
|
Quote:
Not too many people are in a position to pay for that level of engineering and craftsmanship. Best Les |
Planes are not special, they are just machines, just like a car. There is stringent quality control in production that may exceed that in automotive, but all the same, airplanes are pretty basic machines. Most of the tech in aircraft is 50 years plus old, it takes forever for systems advancements to make their way into aviation due to the certification costs and time. Systems are almost always mature, tried and true before they will implement in an aircraft. At the end of the day, assembly line jobs are the same in aviation as any other industry, carried out by the lowest paid person they can get to do the job. The control doesn't come from the worker on the floor, it comes from the quality systems associated with the process.
|
Quote:
At the Sikorsky Factory nearly every issue I faced was caused by management, not the engineers, foremen and workers. In a fit of revelation, Sikorsky decided to take my challenge of doing a Kaisan event (Six Sigma in the 90's). The event covered processes and practices in administrative, engineering and manufacturing - initially focused on my bailiwick, the flight test and production hanger. We found so much institutionalized stupidity that UT/Sikorsky expanded the Kaisan event to include the whole Bridgeport facility. Factories are all about human nature and human's compete against each other, often to the detriment of quality and efficiency. We reduced the flight test acceptance process (leading to "selling" the aircraft to the government via what is called a DD-250) from 14 days to 12. Common sense stuff. We also found that there were DEAD PEOPLE still getting paper copies of the DD-250 sent to their old drop box(es). |
Quote:
The Airbus rep was nearly in tears: Like any manager he had cost reduction goals and he knew OOA composite parts we could make was the answer. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website