![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 15,530
|
Quote:
They claimed it was too difficult to go after the manufacturer that might be infringing on their patent so they went after the "easy" pickings. |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
Hinting at it in my first post here. China does what it wants. This benefits US consumers with lower priced goods. And is why some argue that Trump is all wrong for putting pressure on China. BUT... what the haters don't talk about are the US inventors, developers & industries that get SKah-Rooed by China's pirating everything.
So, this thread OP is a good one. Obvious rip-off of US IP. ...but said rip-off benefits the US (and world) consumers. So where is the balance? Will US companies develop new tech when they know it will be ripped off? Or will they simply pursue non-additive rackets, like money manipulation and govt kick-backs?
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
thing is, the co.s sued by the Regents of UC will go after any importers, sellers in China, etc.
i.e. they will do that extra work if it ain't legal for UC to sue these co.s then the judge will toss it |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 15,530
|
Quote:
I still believe U of C should have filed suit against the suppliers/manufacturers. |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
sure, but this goes beyond getting booted from WMT - way beyond
I dunno why they didn't include the manfs. with the sellers - I suppose you could ask maybe the judge will ask |
||
![]() |
|