![]() |
Which would you rather have?
2000 Boxster S or a 2002 996 C4S?
|
None of the above.
|
996 for the additional space minimally
|
Boxster all day long and twice on Sunday Not even close
How you doing Shaun? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I voted 986S but both are excellent. I tend to see the C4S as a poser 996TT without the power but I’m sure they are fun cars and look great. I just like the tossable Boxster.
|
When I bought my car, I drove several boxsters and caymans and even a 2001 996tt. I was surprised that the 2001 996tt felt boring. And it didn't feel that fast either. I'm sure it's faster than my 2008 Boxster S, but my car is a lot more fun and engaging to drive.
|
Boxster S
You can buy a sedan or a wagon if you need space |
A Boxster S because it's not a 996.
|
The 2000 S but I have one so I’m biased. I’ve never driven a C4S but they’re good looking. Are they even in the same price range?
|
I voted 996 because rag tops are overrated :p
|
Is this Thread a Social experiment or something?
|
On looks alone, I have to go with the 996 C4S.
Of course, I’ve never sat in or driven one either. |
996 all the way. It's the most under valued 911 to date!
Boxters are cheaper and they also feel cheaper IMO. Have you driven a good 996? They are a brilliant drive... It's an old car now but they certainly don't feel old. |
996
|
Quote:
Quote:
So bottom line neither, a slightly different coupe. |
https://youtu.be/j4wCYLTy-6w
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/j4wCYLTy-6w" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website