![]() |
Quote:
...the kind with RIVETS fastening the pockets to the fabric? |
Turbo with PSS9's gets you there - nice pair of rides.
|
Quote:
But I think Vermont doesn't have reciprocity with the RMV...? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The M491 on it's restoration weight loss plan is starting to feel similar. When a new suspension goes in, it may give that car a run for the money. But I know another 40-50 hp would help as well. While I love to go fast, it's the feel of driving that is most precious. |
You don’t -have- to go fast.
It’s the acceleration that makes it fun. That and the ability to pass pretty much at will on a back road. |
Yes, the acceleration is otherworldly.
|
Quote:
Until you chip it and add a decent exhaust at least. Then it’s a little livelier. |
Quote:
|
Shaun, have you driven a 996 C2. Now I didn't like them because they felt so light in the front vs the 4S. You might actually prefer that as many do. Probably more of a 911 air cooled feel.
Regarding speed and acceleration, I am a big fan but how much do I need? I think the 4S was rated at 5.0 0-60 and 170 top speed. I've done neither so really silly to spend money on something I will never use. Now if I was in a macho contest, yes the 996TT would be the way to go. The accountant in me says waste of money "in my case". "In my case". "In my case". I am not a big sports car scene guy but recently I was at an autocross with Jr. He wanted to try so I took him. Brought his Miata (talk about a fun car). The overall winners at the end of the day were a S2000 and a 986S. (I miss my S). Not close to TT capabilities but on that track, that day those cars would have ate a TT. Does it lessen the greatness of the TT, neck no. Does it say it's not perfect and not the ideal car for everyone, I would say so. Anyhow, if blowing by people on the highway is your thing or you need to be the fastest guy around (well until the next version comes along), go for it. I'll still wave to you as you blast by me at my 75mph. SmileWavy |
I am glad you like your C4S, I could counter every one of your comments but not going to waste my time or yours.
If you ever get a chance, get behind the wheel of a 997 GT car. That will change your impression of the 996 series cars. |
Will do. I'm sure I will enjoy.
|
I drove a beautiful, stock 996 C4S when I had my regular 996 coupe w some performance mods. The C4S felt like a big/heavy/slow/understeering barge in comparison. I drove it on Mulholland, you may or may not even have roads like that to test a car. YMMV. :cool:
|
Quote:
I have driven regular 996s, to me they are just meh cars, like the 01 Boxster S I almost bought 3 years ago. For my taste, there just isn't anything interesting about the cars. Quick and capable but, meh. And narrow 996s aren't lookback cars, that's important to me too. |
Quote:
|
That's it exactly Steve. Here's part of a circuit I do 3-5 times a week, maybe 3-5 times around, at low traffic periods. it's great for learning the car and working on technique. So much fun. With a much quicker car, it would all happen too fast and not be as much fun.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1570733010.jpg |
Even the G body cars were dialed in to understeer from the factory. The TT does as I assume the C4s does too. Just like the G body cars they also respond favorably to suspension tweeks. A set of decent coil overs transforms the handling. Mine is coupled (PSS9's) with a bigger rear sway bar and wider tires and it handles like a go kart.
My impression of a 1985 M491 that I was considering buying was that it was a pig - a slow heavy pig - so I get completely where you are coming from. |
I do prefer the G body M491’s without tails, otherwise theY scream all show an no go.
There was a gorgeous black/red one for sale earlier this year that was tempting (except for the price). |
You think that '85 you were looking at was slow Jeremy, try this. I had to do a top end on the motor with 8 broken studs, sort of rushed through the install and didn't have even close to WOT. Drove that for awhile. Slow but still entertaining and fun. Fast forward to this summer, put the '75 wonderbox 915 in which necessitated a new clutch cable. Putting that in found that the pedal box accelerator bell crank bushings were gone. New brass went in.
That combined with the weight loss a custom chip for megaphones, I'm now at less weight than an 84 Carrera with a little more power and all the braking and handling of a Turbo. I think the wonderbox also has short gearing, I can beat an M4 to 45 off the line. That's pretty fun. What I love most about these cars and cars in general is there's a seat for every butt, each with it's own passions and desires. That air cooled 911s are essentially a box of Lego's that you can make whatever crazy car you want makes them a little extra special. Boost, I hear you on the tail. I love it because it's iconic, so period perfect for the body though I do like the sleek tailless look too. If the Catorce cases ever ship, I'll be building a 4.0 MFI motor for the car as soon as I get mine. Then I can put the tail back on, or at least another one saving mine. :D |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website