Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   The new Mustang Mach E revealed (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1045380-new-mustang-mach-e-revealed.html)

rusnak 11-22-2019 08:10 PM

what sort of a-hole clickbait advertising is this thread?

For a SUV on batteries? Might as well start a thread about dildos.

MMARSH 11-23-2019 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chapo (Post 10667095)
California electricity is 49 percent generated by power plants, more when other conditions occur. Its a shell game at this point. Why happens when PG&E shuts down the grid during wildfires and you cant flee your home because the car isn't charged?

A couple of weeks ago, during the fires. We were without electricity for 3 days. My electric vehicle was sitting with 250 miles of range waiting to flee....Motorhome was sitting with 150 gallons of diesel and the jeep was full too....

sc_rufctr 11-23-2019 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manbridge 74 (Post 10667081)
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1574480709.jpg


Looking a little bloated...

Remember the Mustang II? The car we kids lambasted it as a cross between a Pinto and a Mustang, the Poontang! They should have called this one the Mustang III...

Jack Baruth says it well below.....

The saddest part of this is that the Mustang II made money for Ford, but the Mach-E is less of a functional business proposition than a sacrifice to the Molochian deity of modern progressive and collectivist thought. Everybody at the Detroit automakers, and at all the other automakers, knows that electric cars in their current form are a complete fantastical piece of nonsense; they hoover up rare and strategic materials from supply chains that make OPEC look like your friendly neighborhood tree farm while placing massive drains on national electric grids that currently don’t appear adequate to the task of powering all the PlayStations in California. The electric emperor isn’t just naked, he’s stark-raving mad. If you’re foolish enough to point this out, you get a one-way helicopter ride out of the investor class.

Electric cars, like a surprising and dismaying number of other social trends at the moment, have almost no popular support but are nonetheless considered “inevitable” by the media/government/industrial complex. The plain fact is that they are niche products — and they will remain niche products until at least three separate miracles happen in their production, distribution, and refueling. This should inspire Ford to be as cautious as possible, but instead it is taking the one nameplate it has left with any equity—Mustang—and slapping it on what looks like exactly the same vehicle everyone else is developing.

I’ve noticed for a while now that a surprising number of people in the car business are actively ashamed of what they do for a living. The gasoline-powered automobile has done more to improve our lives than almost any other individual invention known to man, but it’s also seen as a low-class, stinking, hopelessly ignorant amusement of the proletariat by the chattering classes who can’t get enough of completely meaningless bibelot trinkets like the AirPods or Airbnb. These people cannot understand our attachment to the automobile, and since they cannot understand it, they fear it. Since they fear it, they have sworn to destroy it. No doubt the heretical aspect of calling this vehicle a “Mustang” is a feature and not a bug to a whole class of individuals who despise the American love affair with the car and who delight in anything that helps destroy that love affair. It’s not that they don’t care about our emotional involvement with Mustangs, it’s that they are actively working to tear that involvement down.

Some great points but I felt rather old after reading that. :(

aways 11-23-2019 09:38 AM

Now the Millennial ricers can drive "guilt free" and know that they are doing their part to "save the planet". lol

red-beard 11-23-2019 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aways (Post 10667521)
Now the Millennial ricers can drive "guilt free" and know that they are doing their part to "save the planet". lol

Where will they put the fart can?

wdfifteen 11-23-2019 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manbridge 74 (Post 10667081)
Jack Baruth says it well below.....

The saddest part of this is that the Mustang II made money for Ford, but the Mach-E is less of a functional business proposition than a sacrifice to the Molochian deity of modern progressive and collectivist thought. Everybody at the Detroit automakers, and at all the other automakers, knows that electric cars in their current form are a complete fantastical piece of nonsense; they hoover up rare and strategic materials from supply chains that make OPEC look like your friendly neighborhood tree farm while placing massive drains on national electric grids that currently don’t appear adequate to the task of powering all the PlayStations in California. The electric emperor isn’t just naked, he’s stark-raving mad. If you’re foolish enough to point this out, you get a one-way helicopter ride out of the investor class.

Electric cars, like a surprising and dismaying number of other social trends at the moment, have almost no popular support but are nonetheless considered “inevitable” by the media/government/industrial complex. The plain fact is that they are niche products — and they will remain niche products until at least three separate miracles happen in their production, distribution, and refueling. This should inspire Ford to be as cautious as possible, but instead it is taking the one nameplate it has left with any equity—Mustang—and slapping it on what looks like exactly the same vehicle everyone else is developing.

I’ve noticed for a while now that a surprising number of people in the car business are actively ashamed of what they do for a living. The gasoline-powered automobile has done more to improve our lives than almost any other individual invention known to man, but it’s also seen as a low-class, stinking, hopelessly ignorant amusement of the proletariat by the chattering classes who can’t get enough of completely meaningless bibelot trinkets like the AirPods or Airbnb. These people cannot understand our attachment to the automobile, and since they cannot understand it, they fear it. Since they fear it, they have sworn to destroy it. No doubt the heretical aspect of calling this vehicle a “Mustang” is a feature and not a bug to a whole class of individuals who despise the American love affair with the car and who delight in anything that helps destroy that love affair. It’s not that they don’t care about our emotional involvement with Mustangs, it’s that they are actively working to tear that involvement down.


Jack Baruth is an ossified, whining old dinosaur who can't stand the idea that today's consumers like cars he doesn't. So what if the EMustang becomes a niche car. Porsche sold fewer than 10,000 911s in 2018. Tesla sold over 145,000 electric cars. If niche cars are worthless, Porsche should pull the plug on the 911 pronto.
He said, "These people cannot understand our attachment to the automobile." First I want to say, "So what? Is it my son's responsibility to understand your attachment to cars and try to make you feel better? If so, why?" Second, the problem with this guy is he is pining for the kinds of cars almost nobody makes anymore because almost nobody wants them. Car buyers like traction control and ABS and air bags everywhere and TPMS and all the nanny crap.
I have a life-long attraction to automobiles. I have owned dozens of air cooled Porsches, VWs, plus several new and old Americans cars and trucks. Electric cars are just another point on the continuum of my attraction to automobiles. My oldest vehicle was made in 1947, has 90 horsepower, and gets about 9 mpg. My newest is a gas/electric 2017 Volt and I don't even know (or care) what it's horsepower rating might be. The last I looked it was clocking 250 mpg. I like them both equally, though for different reasons.
He went on to say, "...and since they cannot understand it, they fear it. Since they fear it, they have sworn to destroy it." That's just paranoia. It has already been destroyed, by road congestion, computerized controls, and the (now) second generation of Americans who are more interested in the newest the cell phone than in the newest car.
The automobile he pines for is already gone, or exists only as niche models. If Porsche can get by selling 10,000 of a niche model somebody will surely still be making whatever the hell he is so impassioned about.

Sooner or later 11-23-2019 01:35 PM

EV sales in the US are possibly 3% of total sales. Eliminate the tax credit and it wouldn't be that high.

That is not a lot of "proof" that the consumer likes EV vehicles.

wdfifteen 11-23-2019 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sooner or later (Post 10667723)
EV sales in the US are possibly 3% of total sales. Eliminate the tax credit and it wouldn't be that high. .

And that makes Jack Baruth fear EV owners are out to destroy his way of life. :rolleyes:

onewhippedpuppy 11-23-2019 03:35 PM

It’s a valid point though. Every automaker on earth is rushing to build a car that consumers don’t want to buy.

madcorgi 11-24-2019 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onewhippedpuppy (Post 10667812)
It’s a valid point though. Every automaker on earth is rushing to build a car that consumers don’t want to buy.

Wait, what about the Cyber Truck?

Fly Mach .86 11-24-2019 09:42 AM

As much as it pains me to admit it, the internal combustion engine is on it's way out. It won't be gone in my lifetime (I'm 73) but it is on it's way out just the same. I used to enjoy hearing and seeing a huge cubic inch displacement naturally aspirated roaring American V8 but they are GONE. It may take 50 years or 100 years but ALL the fossil fuel powered cars will be gone as well. You can argue that the electric grid can't handle the load or that we won't be able to produce enough electricity to charge all the batteries but these are problems that will be solved in the future. Just because we don't have the capacity now doesn't mean we should limit new modes of powering transportation. Time marches on. Things change. Get over it.

pwd72s 11-24-2019 10:32 AM

Well, ya pays your money and makes yer choices.

This makes me wonder how much longer people will be allowed choices.

At 76, I'm thankful to have lived when the choices were many. Soon enough I'll be saying so long while wishing you kids luck.

wdfifteen 11-24-2019 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fly Mach .86 (Post 10668376)
As much as it pains me to admit it, the internal combustion engine is on it's way out.

The dino fuel guys are terrified that you are right, but I don't think you are and i don't think their fear is justified. Even at their best electric cars aren't for everyone. I think what's happening is just that there are more options to chose from - gas, diesel, and, now, electric. As we have more electric cars on the road, there will be less smog and less pressure to lower tailpipe emissions. Dino power will find it's plateau. Gas cars may become a niche market with only high performance enthusiast cars using gas and the boring grocery getters driven by people who only want a functional appliance will be electric. I don't have a problem with that.

Sooner or later 11-24-2019 12:31 PM

Nobody is terrified. They are the future.

At the current time no manufacturer is making a dime when they sell an electric. Initial cost is so high they require a tax credit to move them off the lots. About the only people buying them are high wage earners that don't really need the tax credit. (Per CNBC 70% of buyers make more than 100k a year.)

Charging stations in most of the country are few and far between. (Closest to me is 40 miles). At a cost of about a grand for a home charger with installation you could buy fuel for nearly 10,000 miles of driving. (Non Cali priced fuel)

Every manufacturer is bringing out models that will be competing for less than 5% of the total market.

When someone buys an ev they are getting a hell of a deal because the actual cost is far more than the purchase price. The manufacturer is offering a loss leader hoping to keep a long term customer.

pmax 11-24-2019 12:42 PM

What's the deal with the smart door handles ?

aigel 11-24-2019 01:34 PM

Us car guys must appreciate the maintenance intervals on an electric car. There is practically no maintenance. No oil, filter, plugs, timing belts, emission checks etc. and with regenerative braking, not even much to do on brakes. 100k miles intervals to get to brakes, shocks and maybe some suspension components.

The cars are getting cheaper, the batteries better, charging times shorter. The electric car will beat the combustion engine car on price - initial price and definitely cost of ownership. We aren't even talking performance. Most people care about straight line acceleration for merging etc. Can't beat an electric car on that. To have that power in a gas car on tap, you will commute at <20 mpg.

But again, for our cities, lots of effort going into moving an unsustainable mode of transportation from gas to electric instead of looking at public transport solutions ... maybe the Mustang E 2 can be a self driving electric bus? ;)

G

aigel 11-24-2019 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdfifteen (Post 10667719)
Jack Baruth is an ossified, whining old dinosaur who can't stand the idea that today's consumers like cars he doesn't. So what if the EMustang becomes a niche car. Porsche sold fewer than 10,000 911s in 2018. Tesla sold over 145,000 electric cars. If niche cars are worthless, Porsche should pull the plug on the 911 pronto....

Hit the nail on the head here WD! And as far as millennials "driving guilt free", I think many aren't interested in driving much at all. I am no millennial, but in the cities I totally agree with people that have zero interest in driving. Rather would put a fork in my eye than commute here. I only enjoy road trips and trips up the canyon these days. NOTHING fun in daily driving here anymore.

G

Sooner or later 11-24-2019 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aigel (Post 10668630)
Hit the nail on the head here WD! And as far as millennials "driving guilt free", I think many aren't interested in driving much at all. I am no millennial, but in the cities I totally agree with people that have zero interest in driving. Rather would put a fork in my eye than commute here. I only enjoy road trips and trips up the canyon these days. NOTHING fun in daily driving here anymore.

G

You are trying to apply driving in congested commutes in Cali. It ain't that way in much of the country.

If they are so cost effective why do we need tax credits? If they are so cost effective why do they only make up about 3% of new car sales with heavy tax credits?

wdfifteen 11-24-2019 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sooner or later (Post 10668575)
Nobody is terrified. They are the future.

Mr Baruth seems pretty damn skeert.

Sooner or later 11-24-2019 04:58 PM

His rant is more accurate than not.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.