masraum |
02-07-2020 11:38 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by petrolhead611
(Post 10745012)
One word answer McLovin: uneconomic
|
Exactly. And once they've covered the extra cost (development and tooling), it's no longer cheap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper35
(Post 10745030)
I think McLovin is describing the S2000 on the cheap.
FWD doesn't bother me for most stuff.
|
Yep, but by the time they create something RWD and sell in low numbers, it's no longer cheap.
FWD doesn't bother me in an economy car, but I think I'd be pretty disappointed with a high-perf, sporty car. Or maybe the problem is that I've only ever driven cheap, crappy FWD cars. Maybe the good ones are much better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevej37
(Post 10745037)
Here in MI, for all season driving...RWD doesn't work well in the snow at all, FWD works fine.
|
I get it, and I get that's how it's supposed to work. When I was in HS, we lived in NoVA. We'd get the occasional snow. I remember 3 vehicles in the white stuff, 1 '76 Chevy Chevette (rwd), 2 '78 Dodge Omni (fwd) and 3 '65 Chevy Impala (V-8, 4spd, V-8, rwd). Dad drove my Impala to work (30ish miles to Wash DC) and back. We drove the Chevette in the snow, no problem. Then when we tried to drive the Omni in the snow, it wouldn't go.
All of them probably had cheap, A/S tires.
|