Quote:
Originally Posted by cantdrv55
(Post 11124669)
The management consultant who thought up the employee self eval process ought to be shot. End of rant.
|
I hate the self eval part of the year.
I worked someplace once where we were supposed to do a self eval grading ourselves on a scale of 1-5 (5 is good). I gave myself a couple of fives. I was told "you can't give yourself a 5. A is only warranted for someone who really goes above and beyond and does a lot of extra work that isn't asked of them, and pretty much no one does that."
I worked another place that also used a 1-5 scale, and before I worked there, managers had to set 20% as "5", 10% as "1" and the rest in the middle somewhere. (or maybe I've got the percentages backwards, I don't know for sure). I know a guy that had been a manager at that time. He told me that one year his whole team was amazing, all of them were great with no one that wasn't excelling, but he still had to pick someone to be at the bottom of the list who therefore got reduced compensation. He said that his team was blowing all of the peer teams out of the water. He said that he went to HR and argued and lost. Apparently several folks quit including folks that hadn't been in the bottom group. I don't blame them. Fortunately, when I was there, that was no longer a requirement (or if it was, it wasn't "official" and I wasn't ever in the bottom of the list).
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBAtarga
(Post 11124680)
Where I am, it doesn't matter what you document as your accomplishments - whatever pay "raise" you get is what the boss thinks of you compared to others that he has to share/distribute the funds to.
|
I also worked at a place where near the beginning of the year, you had criteria given to you by management (do X, Y and Z this year, these are minimums, there are good and anything extra is great, these are a big part of how you'll be evaluated at the end of the year). I usually blew all or most of those items out of the water. I also worked a ton of OT. My manager knew that any time they needed someone, they could ask and I'd be there. I had a buddy that also was at the top of the list for all or most of the criteria. I was always graded in the middle of the pack. My buddy got one step below avg one year, and blamed that on a bit of a personality conflict with his manager. The next year, (different manager) he said "screw it, I'm going to ignore all of the criteria, and pretty much intentionally tank all of them. But I'm going to make nice with all of the managers (we had several, think "Office Space"). He did, he was pretty much the next to last person on the list for every criteria that year, and he got a "5 rating overall with a good raise and bonus.
And yes, the manager of the group was given a pool, and the manager divvied the pool up how they saw fit. I always worked OT. I always got a dead center rating. I always got a modest raise. I never got a bonus (you worked X amount of OT, so are ineligible). I know guys that sometimes got better than avg ratings and sometimes worse than avg. Those guys sometimes got bonuses, but also sometimes got nothing including not getting a modest raise.
Fortunately, we both eventually moved on from that team to other teams and eventually other jobs that were far, far better. After I moved teams, I don't think I ever got an average rating.