![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 4,033
|
Brain Teaser for the Engineers (Angle Sizing)
Referring to the photo above, I have this detail on my project where the engineer is insisting on structural steel (highlighted in blue) to support a lighting element (highlighted in yellow). The lighting element is 125 feet long and weighs 1.5 pounds per foot. The flashing shown over the top of the steel angle is part of my waterproofing system and is .040 aluminum that is doubled up with a hemmed edge. They're calling for this support angle to be a 7x4x3/8. The attachment of the angle makes it a costly detail to construct (not shown in bid documents) and it is difficult to properly waterproof the facade with this angle attached to the building. I think I could fabricate a cold formed steel angle to reinforce the aluminum angle at a significantly lower cost and it wouldn't fowl up my waterproofing system. If so, how thick should that angle be (18ga, 16ga, thinner or thicker?) Show your work because I'll need to convince the engineer. Last edited by wilnj; 10-01-2021 at 11:10 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Vaccinated and Boosted
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,577
|
You can definitely reduce the thickness by using a HSLA steel. (High Strength Low Alloy) If I remember correctly the angle iron material is extremely low carbon with a Yield strength of about 35KSI at best. So going with a HSLA 60 or 70 steel, this will allow you to reduce the thickness by roughly 40% to 50%. You may be able to do some things with the shape of the steel to even reduce the thickness more. Such as formed ribs etc. if space allows
__________________
2013 911 Turbo S 2025 Lexus TX350, 2024 Honda CRV Hybrid 1930 Cadillac V8, 1991 Ford F250, 2023 Chevy Colorado And some garage space.... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 4,033
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,842
|
Global concern:
Having two dissimilar metals in a waterproof scenario is a precursor for corrosion. Based on your dwg; Found engineering math book picture: "Cantilever beam with concentrated load @ free end" results = shear & moment Last edited by 3rd_gear_Ted; 10-01-2021 at 12:41 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 4,033
|
Quote:
Doh! I knew it was a simple answer. Too far removed from sizing any structures, I completely forgot to treat it as a cantilevered beam. |
||
![]() |
|