David Inc. |
07-26-2022 04:50 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Higgins
(Post 11752726)
Very good point. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Except Red Bull managed to prevail when it was important, deciding a championship.
This does speak to one of my pet peeves concerning F1 - the lack of track to track consistency with regards to race control and track marshals. Look at how this new emphasis on track limits has all of their panties in a twist. As well it should. Very inconsistent from venue to venue.
|
Different stewards every race, and they're alternating race directors. It's no way to build consistency but there seems to be no motivation to fix it. I mean, we keep watching, right? Until it costs money or the drivers start refusing to race they're not going to force all the different hosts to use a single set of stewards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by herr_oberst
(Post 11752434)
Terrific, another whiny mercedes driver. And ham managed to top himself by claiming he lost 3 kilos of weight because his "drinks" bottle was broken. Not only did he drive harder than any other person ever in the history of driving, he also suffered.
He suffered!!!!
|
I mean if the drink bottle is broken it can be bad news. Sure Hamilton's life is pretty nice in general, but no drinks sucks. Remember the one race last year where he almost passed out on the podium from dehydration and heat exhaustion?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RBNetEngr
(Post 11752377)
Russell was saying something about the position of his car being on the inside in the turn, and the relationship of his front tire to Checo’s rear tire. So, he was implying that even though Checo’s car was ahead, that the position of his car on the inside of the turn meant that he had a right to the space (which he quickly took to the right curb, basically running Checo off the track). He kept indicating that he was correct, according to the passing rules.
Not sure where to see this rule to know who was correct. But given that no penalty was issued, was Russell correct?
|
Nope. He was 100% wrong and deserved a penalty, but stewards being stewards they tend to dole out penalties based on consequences, not actions, which is another way that they're failing to build consistency. Had he hit Checo and damaged the car he would have gotten a penalty for sure, but since Checo was able to hold the position they didn't give one. Same nonsense as Checo and Hamilton at Silverstone--Checo left no room as required but Hamilton avoided contact so no penalty.
|