|
Paramedic so traumatized by seeing someone who had been shot, that she can no longer work.
Wow, guess she better stay the heck out of Chicago. |
What a shyteshow. $1.15 million from a non-union propmaster? Good luck, hope she's a "trust fund baby" who only works in film as a side hobby.
|
I was involved in a few fatalities on set while at Disney. Where is my mental trauma money?
|
You just need to find a friendly head shrinker willing to fake up some records from when you were working
|
The only comment I want to make...
At the end of the day Mr Baldwin has to be able to live with what he's done. - and after everything that's happened I wish him luck with that. He's going to need it. |
will not bother him one bit
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12192957/Weapons-expert-Alec-Baldwin-case-hungover-Rust-set-prosecutors-claim.html
"The weapons supervisor on the film set where Alec Baldwin shot and killed a cinematographer was drinking and smoking marijuana in the evenings during the making of Rust, prosecutors have alleged, saying she was likely to have been hungover when she loaded a live bullet into the revolver that the actor used. ..." Lee |
From the linked article:
Jason Bowles, Gutierrez-Reed's lawyer, said on Tuesday that the prosecution has mishandled the case. 'The case is so weak that they now have chosen to resort to character assassination claims about Hannah,' he told the Associated Press. Over the course of my career, I saw (and heard all about) a number of rather serious industrial accidents. Even some fatalities. I even testified in a few cases arising from these accidents. In not a single case that I am aware of were the actions of the involved parties on the night before the accident investigated. I have to agree with Bowles. This is an act of desperation on the part of the prosecutor, indicating he has a very weak case. Let's keep a couple of things in mind: ) Gutierrez-Reed was away at lunch when this incident occurred. ) The gun went through two other sets of hands - the assistant director's and Baldwin's - before the shot was fired. Neither checked the gun. She was twice removed from possession of this firearm. |
Quote:
|
Weapons being handled and the union weapons expert was not on hand?
|
Quote:
The assistant director did not receive this firearm directly from the weapons expert. He picked it up off of a cart. She was nowhere around when he did that. God only knows how long it had sat there unattended. The fact that it was not locked up while she was gone is inexcusable. The fact that someone chose to handle it, after it had sat there unattended for an indeterminate amount of time, without personally watching the weapons expert inspect it first serves to compounds the problem. |
There seems to be a great deal of 'at fault' to go around in that scenario.... and that def. includes the trigger puller.
|
Quote:
(ie most Hollywood guns are real weapons modified) There is a chain-of-custody which is supposed to be followed but was broken by multiple persons. The owner of the film company was also the committer of the fatal act. Both involve criminal negligence. 2). How is that different from a parent leaving a loaded gun on the table at a teenage party? Both roles are liable for what happened. Again, criminal negligence. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If there is to be weapons handling while the crew is at lunch the assistant director will have the armorer break early for lunch or let them know that the director wants a rehearsal before the company comes back to film and have the armorer take a short lunch. There was absolutely no reason to leave a "hero" gun laying around. |
6 days old.
https://www.geo.tv/latest/510280-alec-baldwin-loses-bid-to-halt-lawsuit-in-rust-shooting-case <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ADGyglYqeoM?si=-GBFEug77qHvBMt7" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Quote:
What a useless twat. She brings shame to her household and profession. |
He's going back in front of the grand jury. Prosecution did the right thing by taking more time to prepare, I suspect.
|
Prosecution more or less got the defense to show their hand, then withdrew charges. They have used that information to solidify their case.
|
Good luck to him.
If there's more to this story, and there was some kind of coverup, then let the chips fall where they should. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/prosecutors-seek-to-recharge-alec-baldwin-in-rust-shooting-after-additional-facts-emerge/ar-AA1inOBh?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=ada439fdd29c4efb98da943cd eeeab86&ei=14 |
Quote:
|
Prosecution has refiled involuntary manslaughter charges after a grand jury investigation.
|
There was new forensic testing of the gun and they're now saying it wasn't modified or faulty.
|
When you eliminate all other possibilities, what' left is the truth.
Alec Baldwin, pointed the firearm at another person, He chocked the hammer and he pulled the trigger. When the firearm discharged, a person down range was struck by the Baldwin bullet and she was killed. After striking the first person, the very same bullet struck another person. Those are the facts. Depraved indifference to human life, murder two. |
I get it but this could've happened to anyone.
Baldwin pulled the trigger and then lied about it so yes he's at fault but he's not alone. Just one question: How did a live round find its way into a prop gun? - Complacency and incompetence? |
Just one question: How did a live round find its way into a prop gun? - Complacency and incompetence?
Yep. I have been bit by my complacency and incompetence before but nothing that caused injury or death. My learning experience wasn't as terrible as Baldwin's. |
^ That's an easy answer.
Occam's razor They were screwing around with the gun. Probably drinking and shooting the night before. That explains the gun. It doesn't explain why any adult would point any gun at a person and pull the trigger. |
|
Alec Baldwin indited for manslaughter....about time.
|
Oh my.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/02/20/172483097/biden-for-protection-buy-a-shotgun-buy-a-shotgun Plus, two shotgun blasts should scare off most intruders, Biden says. |
"The indictment charges Baldwin, 65, with involuntary manslaughter (negligent use of a firearm) or, in the alternative, involuntary manslaughter (without due caution or circumspection), both fourth-degree felonies." I'm no lawyer but with his money I don't see a conviction coming out of this. However, "without due caution or circumspection" might be within reach if the prosecution can establish that Baldwin had a responsibility to check the weapon before using it. Those of us with training know that we have that duty but in gen pop it may not be so. |
Jury selection set for July 9.
|
Peter, seriously doubt this happens to many here.
NFW Higgins shoots anyone by mistake. Never would happwn to you either |
The left should purposely try to break him financially like they're doing with Trump.
Oh wait... he's one of them... |
|
Hals is a slimeball
|
that footage is completely irrelevant and pointless. yet again the media proves itself to be emo garbage.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website