Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   A chat conversation I had with a Tesla fanboy today... (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1160364-chat-conversation-i-had-tesla-fanboy-today.html)

RANDY P 04-23-2024 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 12236277)
huh, took someone to the airport in my miata for a week long trip just this morning.

are you running a bus service? do you really NEED to take 7 people with gear to the airport every day, and need to have every car in your entire fleet have this capability every monring?

also, how would that taxi service not be the perfect application for EVs, LOL

i call this argument the argument from practicality to an impractical level. like its ****ing dumb to think that everyone, always, every day, needs to have a car that take take a family of 7 camping, in the snow, on a whim, with no prep, all the time. like, dumbest argument ever. it is 100% more impractical to think that everyone needs such capability, and as it is to just drive a small sports car 90+ percent of the time.



im glad you can admit that government just picked oil and gas and subsidized them their entire dominate period and thats why it "works"

so, i mean, sorry. you are just mad that government is helping another technology become the next dominate one.

but those are your feelings. and public policy doesnt depend on your feelings. they are for you to deal with.

Your inability to comprehend is showing again. Like I said, people need oil. IE: No one needs an EV.

Either way- no worries, EV sales are flatlining here. Good riddance.

rjp

wdfifteen 04-23-2024 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12236875)
Like I said, people need oil.

Why don't need oil for passengers cars.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12236875)
No one needs an EV.

We need sustainable, affordable personal transportation. Hydrogen and EVs are the two best options currently.

Rick Lee 04-23-2024 06:49 AM

How are those affordable and sustainable currently? I don't know that I've ever seen a hydrogen refueling station. I'm sure they're around, but they can't be real common. And EVs are expensive even with the gov't. subsidies. May not be expensive for you, but most people can't pay cash for one and 5-7% car loans don't help the matter.

cockerpunk 04-23-2024 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12236875)
Your inability to comprehend is showing again. Like I said, people need oil. IE: No one needs an EV.

Either way- no worries, EV sales are flatlining here. Good riddance.

rjp

why do you think people need oil, but don't need electricity?

like what?

what the **** are you talking about?

next we'll be debating the need for a hot water heater im sure. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

people dont even NEED cars, sincere question ... what are you talking about?

wdfifteen 04-23-2024 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick Lee (Post 12236928)
How are those affordable and sustainable currently?

It seems everyone but you is thinking about the future. We are currently getting by with fueling our economy with oil, but an oil-based economy isn't sustainable. We have to think about the future and get started building it ASAP.

RANDY P 04-23-2024 09:44 AM

Do I count our total inability to build batteries, our age-old network of fossil fuel delivery, the reduced convenience and seasonal ineffectiveness of electric powered anything (Chicago cold weather LOL), and the simple fact they don’t sell without massive incentives (and even that is tanking now!)

Oh, I forgot “ugly”

Anyhow, other than those items, you make total sense.

Stay the course!

Rjp

RANDY P 04-23-2024 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdfifteen (Post 12236945)
It seems everyone but you is thinking about the future. We are currently getting by with fueling our economy with oil, but an oil-based economy isn't sustainable. We have to think about the future and get started building it ASAP.

Not true. We have oil. We don’t have batteries or the fortitude to deal with the shortcomings of Eve

Leave that to the Europeans who have frankly a silly energy policy. (Winter 22 is what I’m referring to)

Rjp

RANDY P 04-23-2024 09:49 AM

Ps punk, look up uses for oil. Google it.

That’s why it’s needed.

Rjp

Tobra 04-23-2024 09:55 AM

How are you going to manufacture an EV without using petroleum?

RANDY P 04-23-2024 10:03 AM

We’re not. Nor are we going to manufacture anything else in our modern lives

Perhaps they are thinking of returning to bows, arrows and firewood for heat. Y’know, “progress”

Europe is a textbook case of poor energy policy. We should NOT be following them, let alone give up our advantage of being an oil producer.

cockerpunk 04-23-2024 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12237049)
Ps punk, look up uses for oil. Google it.

That’s why it’s needed.

Rjp

please, try to have a point.

cause this isnt one.

"we should make things out of stone, because its a more fundamental thing needed to process metal. metal bad! too complicated!"

RANDY P 04-23-2024 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 12237062)
please, try to have a point.

cause this isnt one.

"we should make things out of stone, because its a more fundamental thing needed to process metal. metal bad! too complicated!"

How dumb. Are you just being argumentative or are you really that clueless?

It’s a perfectly valid point. What’s laughable is your inane argument that oil doesn’t matter to American standards of living, let alone to the civilized world

I’m not going to bother what anyone else would realize-Study up on some uses for oil before you knee - jerk “nuh-uh”, for a change

rjp

Mahler9th 04-23-2024 10:11 AM

"There is a **** ton of money being made keeping people angry and afraid."

The money is made by getting people's attention. Sometimes it seems that creating anger and fear is part or that, sometimes not (like pron).

"Keeping..." well getting and keeping attention.

The species as we know/knew it evolved over a long time in parallel with means of communication like verbal and written language. The pace of development of the latter has changed... all else being equal.

Some aspects of "anger and fear" are controllable... others.. well perhaps not.

And of course in the US the gubmint has at times encouraged some consumer and corporate behavior and discouraged other consumer and corporate behavior. Not all people agree with all of these activities and over time (even femtoseconds) folks change their minds.

I think this likely to continue.

cockerpunk 04-23-2024 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12237067)
How dumb. Are you just being argumentative or are you really that clueless?

It’s a perfectly valid point. What’s laughable is your inane argument that oil doesn’t matter to American standards of living, let alone to the civilized world

I’m not going to bother what anyone else would realize-Study up on some uses for oil before you knee - jerk “nuh-uh”, for a change

rjp

you havnt made a point, never mind a "perfectly valid one"

i dont know what point you think you have made, if want to try again, you could. but as it stands "people need oil" is not a point. poeple dont need oil. and also, who is talking about not having oil? like what the actual **** are you talking about? do you think because passenger cars are moving away from oil, we will not use oil for anything? what kind of nonsense are you arguing?

Mahler9th 04-23-2024 10:22 AM

"there is the whole technical infeasibility of it too.

full self driving is a silicon valley software engineers wet dream, not a reality anywhere else."

I know some SV engineers... they likely have the same types of dreams as anyone else.

Depends on what you mean by "full self driving."

That term can be applied to a bus in a geofenced environment...

Or a shuttle on a college campus... or...

A geofenced environment like a senior living community campus....

https://www.thevillages.com/life/national-spotlight-shines-on-pilot-self-driving-taxi

I consulted with a professor back in '18 or '19 about starting an AV technology company.

Interesting stuff.

https://unmanned.tamu.edu/projects/

cockerpunk 04-23-2024 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahler9th (Post 12237080)
"there is the whole technical infeasibility of it too.

full self driving is a silicon valley software engineers wet dream, not a reality anywhere else."

I know some SV engineers... they likely have the same types of dreams as anyone else.

Depends on what you mean by "full self driving."

That term can be applied to a bus in a geofenced environment...

Or a shuttle on a college campus... or...

A geofenced environment like a senior living community campus....

https://www.thevillages.com/life/national-spotlight-shines-on-pilot-self-driving-taxi

I consulted with a professor back in '18 or '19 about starting an AV technology company.

Interesting stuff.

https://unmanned.tamu.edu/projects/

even musk is saying FSD will take 10 more years.

and i doubt even that. ultimately we will need to change road design, and then re work all the roads in order to actually achieve FSD. and then you start looking at stuff like snow and ice etc ... its a pipe dream. anyone who says otherwise, is a techbro

RANDY P 04-23-2024 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 12237076)
you havnt made a point, never mind a "perfectly valid one"

i dont know what point you think you have made, if want to try again, you could. but as it stands "people need oil" is not a point. poeple dont need oil. and also, who is talking about not having oil? like what the actual **** are you talking about? do you think because passenger cars are moving away from oil, we will not use oil for anything? what kind of nonsense are you arguing?

Of course you don’t understand, you are Punk.

:cool:

Rjp

cockerpunk 04-23-2024 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12237104)
Of course you don’t understand, you are Punk.

:cool:

Rjp

glad you can admit it was nonsense all along.

wdfifteen 04-23-2024 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12237045)
Not true. We have oil.

We have competitively priced oil now, but all too soon we will be relying of people who don't necessarily like us for $5 a gallon gas - if they'll let us keep it that low.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12237045)
We don’t have batteries or the fortitude to deal with the shortcomings of Eve

YOU may not have the fortitude. Some other people may not have the fortitude. Fortunately, we aren't wedded to the status quo. And as a nation we'd better find an alternative to oil while we still have cheap oil of our own.

wdfifteen 04-23-2024 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 12237067)
What’s laughable is your inane argument that oil doesn’t matter to American standards of living, ...

Oil matters HUGELY to the American standard of living! Our whole economy runs on oil. That's what's wrong. We depend on a globally traded commodity that we don't control. We are at the mercy of OPEC and the other oil producers, and they don't give a rip about our standard of living. We need to start getting off of oil now so our economy doesn't implode when cheap oil runs out.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.