![]() |
Question for the Pond Experts - Can I reduce Flow?
My pond pump is too powerful. I tried a smaller pump and it puts out too little. My current pump is creating a waterfall that is almost like Niagra and way too loud.
I'm wondering if it will damage the pump for me to add an in-line ball valve where I can adjust the water pressure. Any advice would be appreciated. Vern |
Maybe put a T in the line to the waterfall and direct the second line back into the pond?
|
Yea, diverter T with an orifice in one of the output lines. Maybe make a simple flow control.
|
I like the above idea of a diverter valve. If it's a valve then you can "tune" it as 1990C4S said.
The only other thing that I could think of which may be problematic would be adjusting the voltage or current to the pump. I know that in some circumstances reduced voltage or current will slow something down without causing issues, but then in other cases, it can harm equipment. I'm not sure how to determine if your pump is the former or latter. |
Why not just a valve on the line?
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1726234995.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I got a "B" in fluid dynamics. from memory, you won't hurt your pump. I remember everything you add downstream of the pump will add friction. elbows, T's, length of pipe. you could T it off and run a secondary outlet underwater somewhere for added current.
I think if you choke it off with a ball valve type thing, the water exiting that valve will increase in velocity (velocity = flow/area - I think). might be even more noise and excitement. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
simple. speed controller on motor.
|
Quote:
At the very least, throttling the line will use more electricity because the pump is working harder. Working harder means more heat, which will shorten the motor's life. Significantly? That would be up to you. Worst case scenario is the flow is so restricted, there isn't enough water flowing through the pump to keep the motor cool. That will cost ya. Adding a tee and a line back to the pond with a valve in it that would control the bypass flow would be the best option. |
If it's purpose is to put O2 into the water and clean it up, consider an aeration diffuser system instead of sprinkler fountain.
Makes more sense to move air instead of water. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Restricting the discharge flow will reduce
the load on the motor. At deadhead conditions, the HP requirement it at it's very lowest. But it can also cause low-flow recirculation in the impeller. That causes hydraulic turbulence and vibration and could reduce the life of the bearings and impeller. But on a low-energy pond pump it probably wouldn't be that big of a deal. As mentioned above, the best way to do it would be to reduce the speed of the pump. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website