![]() |
Bill's reference above really got me thinking about the need for nano/cancer research. Google quickly found a number of initial studies, this info below is direct from a 2024 NIH report:
The incidence of colorectal cancer in those under 50 years of age (early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC)) is increasing throughout the world. This has predominantly been an increase in distal colonic and rectal cancers, which are biologically similar to late onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) but with higher rates of mucinous or signet ring histology, or poorly differentiated cancers. The epidemiology of this change suggests that it is a cohort effect since 1960 and is most likely driven by an environmental cause. We explore the possible role of microplastics as a driver for this change. The development of sporadic colorectal cancer is likely facilitated by the interaction of gut bacteria and the intestinal wall. Normally, a complex layer of luminal mucus provides colonocytes with a level of protection from the effects of these bacteria and their toxins. Plastics were first developed in the early 1900s. After 1945 they became more widely used, with a resultant dramatic increase in plastic pollution and their breakdown to microplastics. Microplastics (MPs) are consumed by humans from an early age and in increasingly large quantities. As MPs pass through the gastrointestinal tract they interact with the normal physiological mechanism of the body, particularly in the colon and rectum, where they may interact with the protective colonic mucus layer. We describe several possible mechanisms of how microplastics may disrupt this mucus layer, thus reducing its protective effect and increasing the likelihood of colorectal cancer. Conclusions: The epidemiology of increase in EOCRC suggests an environmental driver. This increase in EOCRC matches the time sequence in which we could expect to see an effect of rapid increase of MPs in the environment and, as such, we have explored possible mechanisms for this effect. We suggest that it is possible that the MPs damage the barrier integrity of the colonic mucus layer, thus reducing its protective effect. MPs in CRC pathogenesis warrants further investigation. Future directions: Further clarification needs to be sought regarding the interaction between MPs, gut microbiota and the mucus layer. This will need to be modelled in long-term animal studies to better understand how chronic consumption of environmentally-acquired MPs may contribute to an increased risk of colorectal carcinogenes. |
Well we all have to die of something. Excessive plastic ingestion accumulated over the years could be a new way to pass on. Hopefully legislation will prevent that happening.
My wife buys a case of bottled water. I take one when I go golfing and reuse the bottle by filling with tap water. Edmonton tap water is excellent. Calgary tap water is not so good. Calgarians can chime in if they like!:) I would take our tap water over bottled water any day. Cheers, Guy. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
One can watch YouTube videos of people with a simple microscopes looking at the microplastics in processed foodstuff. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1736433921.jpg https://www.eenews.net/articles/epa-in-a-really-tough-spot-after-landmark-fluoride-ruling/ https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/completed/fluoride https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/fluoride-childrens-health-grandjean-choi/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3491930/ |
Quote:
these are basic facts, im sorry. you are just wrong. |
Quote:
How is the science wrong? |
We just drink tap water. I actually fill up the water dispenser with tap water in my office.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
And that’s the facts Jack |
Quote:
jesus this is high school chemistry. just find a school bus, any one will do, and get on it. just take it to wherever its going. how do we live in a world and fully grown adults, who presumably are successful humans, are full of such, absolute ****ing hogwash? at least in 1964 we had the good sense to openly mock this conspiracy. https://64.media.tumblr.com/ceb755a7...i1fo8_250.gifv |
Can you share a study or two that confirmed the safety of fluoride in drinking water? That might help. I have no knowledge or opinion on the subject but just proclaiming “you’re wrong” isn’t compelling evidence.
|
Fluoride was a toxic industrial waste before they started putting it in the water
Look it up cp. We are here to shine a light on your ignorance. You are welcome |
Quote:
this place is just full of nonsense. basic educational nonsense. we should be bullying this stuff. being gay isnt a choice, but believing in total nonsense is. that makes this fair game. JFC. please, just go to high school, im begging you. basic chemistry isnt that hard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQyf3QgRP-c |
I hope essential oil sales pick up soon...mostly because it might take up some time otherwise spent here repeating Alex Jones sorts of BS.
|
Flouride (at the levels in drinking water) is perfectly safe. Geez you guys. :rolleyes:
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFc5hwqiJTw its not brilliant, its just dumb. Quote:
i used to think human problems were hard. they are hard things to fix. no, they are dangerously easy. so easy in fact, that somehow some subset of society gets a special feeling in their ting-a-lings, to disagree with it. its not brilliant, its just dumb. |
i recently saw a tiktok that made the argument that there has only ever been one social disagreement. throughout all of your lives, from the founding country onwards ... only one actual disagreement.
and that disagreement is "was the enlightenment a good idea or not?" |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website