You say no WMD's?

Mulholland · 06-12-2004, 09:18 PM

Quote:

The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.

The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission briefed the Security Council on new findings that could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile and WMD program.

The briefing contained satellite photographs that demonstrated the speed with which Saddam dismantled his missile and WMD sites before and during the war. Council members were shown photographs of a ballistic missile site outside Baghdad in May 2003, and then saw a satellite image of the same location in February 2004, in which facilities had disappeared.

WorldTribune

If it is good for America, it is bad for liberals/Kerry (the war criminal)

Ya, ya, ya, "welcome to the board newbie." I warn ya, the truth is going to hurt.

nostatic · nostatic's Garage

Confirmed by any other source? I don't consider the World Tribune to exactly be the most reliable source.

Mulholland · 06-12-2004, 09:32 PM

Aren't the totalitarian dictatorship collective, better known as the U.N., good enough for ya?...Read the article, it is not an opinion piece.

Mulholland · 06-12-2004, 09:38 PM

Quote:

"All of Iraq's WMD activities were highly compartmentalized . . . with deception and denial built into each program. Deliberate dispersal and destruction of material and documentation . . . began pre-conflict and ran trans- to post-conflict. Post-war looting destroyed or dispersed important and easily collectible material and evidence. . . . Significant elements of this looting were carried out in a systematic and deliberate manner, with the clear aim of concealing pre-war activities of Saddam's regime. Some WMD personnel crossed borders in the pre/trans-conflict period, and may have taken evidence and even weapons-related materials with them. Any actual WMD weapons or material is likely to be small . . . and difficult to identify with normal search procedures. Even the bulkiest materials we are searching for . . . can be concealed in spaces not much larger than a two-car garage."

-- David Kay

Say uncle..SAY UNCLE!

Mulholland · 06-12-2004, 09:42 PM

Madeline Albright, Feb. 18, 1998: "Iraq is a long way from (here), but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

Whose the LIAR now?...Why the Democrat party of course.

Landslide 04

nostatic · nostatic's Garage

Quote:

Originally posted by Mulholland
Aren't the totalitarian dictatorship collective, better known as the U.N., good enough for ya?...Read the article, it is not an opinion piece.

do you believe everything you read?

Mulholland · 06-12-2004, 10:06 PM

Just the facts maam.

techweenie · techweenie's Garage

(yawn) here we go again with a reading-challenged poster.

'Programs' and 'components' are not weapons.

Staylo · Staylo's Garage

Is that you Len? Yeah, that you.....

nostatic · nostatic's Garage

"Programs of Mass Destruction"

I hear that will be the tag line for NBC's fall lineup.

"Components of Mass Destruction"

Maybe Chuck could use that for a new line of Elephant Racing parts.

techweenie · techweenie's Garage

Not sure how many people were killed by 'programs.'

And lest we forget, Saddam had the ability to deliver these 'programs' all of 600-700 miles with missles slightly better than German VIIs.

But wouldn't it be great if just creating a 'program' was all it took? Then SDI would have been a wise expenditure!

on-ramp · 06-13-2004, 09:33 AM

looking for WMDs is exactly the same OJ still looking for the killers.

hhahaha

techweenie · techweenie's Garage

You mean the WMDs are located in golf courses?

Mulholland · 06-13-2004, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by techweenie
(yawn) here we go again with a reading-challenged poster.

'Programs' and 'components' are not weapons.

This is rich, sorry chicken-little, the Clinton recession is over and 50,000,000 people were liberated in Iraq/Afghanistan. Libya folded. North Korea is shutting the hell up. We have a President who respects the office and isn't bought and paid for by Communist China, Loral Corp., Mark Rich and Enron...The dirty days of Clinton are over and only the ostrich continues putting his head in the sand that he frequently craps on.

limousine liberals...pfffff

the sky is falling, the sky is falling...braaaaaaaaaackkkkkkk...the sky is falling {/chicken liberal}

lendaddy · 06-13-2004, 01:32 PM

"Is that you Len? Yeah, that you....."

lol. No, but perhaps a doppleganger

I like his style. Hey Mulholland check out my just opened site at www.peoplesnation.com we could use a guy like you

Mulholland · 06-13-2004, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by techweenie
Not sure how many people were killed by 'programs.'

And lest we forget, Saddam had the ability to deliver these 'programs' all of 600-700 miles with missles slightly better than German VIIs.

But wouldn't it be great if just creating a 'program' was all it took? Then SDI would have been a wise expenditure!

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

Don't be a weenie. You crazy liberals buying the socialist propaganda hook, line and sinker...Put down the Kool-Aid.

Saddam starved his people to death, murdered 100s of thousands, used mustard gas on Kurds, invaded Kuwait and had dealings with Al Qaeda. Apparently you know something Clinton/Halfbright/Kerry/Annan didn't...All intel pointed unwaveringly to Saddam being a threat in either delivery or supplying Al Qaeda with weapons.

It is funny how liberals are all for "liberating the people" until it really comes down to business, then they don't give a hoot for them and would rather see them enslaved and the United States in jeopardy.

landslide 04

Mulholland · 06-13-2004, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by techweenie
(yawn) here we go again with a reading-challenged poster.

'Programs' and 'components' are not weapons.

"Contempt prior to investigation will leave a man in everlasting ignorance" -- Herbert Spencer

"Contempt after investigation and ignoring reality just makes a man contemptible" -- Mulholland

nostatic · nostatic's Garage

ladies and gentlemen....welcome the newest troll on the board...let's have a big hand for....

Mulholland!

Mulholland · 06-13-2004, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nostatic
ladies and gentlemen....welcome the newest troll on the board...let's have a big hand for....

Mulholland!

Thankya, thankya very much! {/elvis}

Bye the way...I own a WRX (cause I wasn't born spoiled and cannot afford a Porsh)...I make approximately 320+ to the wheels and am relatively race-prepped.

If I made as much as you limo liberals I would still be driving a Subaru.

If you ever get passed by a black WRX on Mulholland or in Malibu, or you just see a dark blur pass you, it may very well be me.

techweenie · techweenie's Garage

"...sound and fury signifying nothing..." -- Willy the Shake

All af the fertilizer you're throwing against the fan has been thrown before and with just as much lack of evidence and insight.

You haven't posted a single persuasive argument and backed it with an attributed fact. Parroting the Limbaugh line doesn't cut it around here, sonny boy.