I know..I know....it was all taken out of context...

[rcecale]

Originally posted by island911
Not the highest degree of forward thinking, there (of those dem's.)

Actually, I'd say it was quite Backwards...prefering the devil they DON'T know, over the devil they DO know. And gambling the security of the nation on him...economic, as well as physical security. Yikes!

Randy

[island911]

Originally posted by ubiquity0
Its Polical ‘Logic’ 101

x>y
z>y
therefore z=x


-An a$$ pimple is better than Bush.
-Kerry is better than Bush.
Therefore Kerry must be an a$$ pimple.

hmmm. . .sounded to me that kc said he would vote for Kerry OR an "a$$ pimple on a crack whore' . . .rather than Bush.

he hadn't said he would choose Kerry over an "a$$ pimple on a crack whore".

if either one will do, for him, then he was equating the two. . . or at least leaving it ambiguous.

Me; I was just stealing that creative line. -funny stuff. . .As I said, it should be a bumper-sticker, .

[ubiquity0]

Originally posted by island911

if either one will do, for him, then he was equating the two. . . or at least leaving it ambiguous.

Thats still not logical.

x>y
z>y

no conclusions can be drawn re: z's relationship to x

[island911]

Originally posted by island911
. . .or at least leaving it ambiguous.

so I don't get what you are saying.

Logically if
x>y
z>y

Then, the conclusions which can be drawn (re: z's relationship to x) is that they BOTH, equally fullfil the relationship wrt(with respect to) y. (greater-than relationship)

I imagine that kc thinks x>z>y (where; x=kerry, z=apoacw, y=bush)
.. .but that does not (logically) imply that x>>y.