![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MN
Posts: 172
|
Need help selecting a digital camera.
Looking for a digital camera to take pics of Porsche's at Porsche get togethers. Also at the race track when in motion and possibly some video. Need to take several pics in quick secession when the cars come down the track. What or which camera should I get? I would like to spend aprox. $250-$400 range. Please do not get over technical. Thanks
|
||
![]() |
|
drag racing the short bus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Location, Location...
Posts: 21,983
|
I suggest the Canon EOS SLR 20D. It's more than you want to spend, but worth it in the long run.
![]() Here's a link: http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&fcategoryid=139&modelid=10464
__________________
The Terror of Tiny Town |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,322
|
Cannon rebel. High end am/pro SLR, but it is digial. Newest version is a grand, prior model is $700.
In your price range, I *really* like my Fuji S5000. Only complaint is that it uses the expensive memory format (xd).
__________________
“IN MY EXPERIENCE, SUSAN, WITHIN THEIR HEADS TOO MANY HUMANS SPEND A LOT OF TIME IN THE MIDDLE OF WARS THAT HAPPENED CENTURIES AGO.” |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 1,638
|
For less than $400, i'd suggest the panasonic fz3. Its got a really nice lens and more features than I'll ever understand, but its simple enough to use.
Its gotten very good reviews at that price point. I was looking for a camera when I saw this thread... http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?threadid=196537&highlight=panasonic+digital but didn't want to spend that much money. This link describes the FZ3 and compares it with the more expensive camera described in the thread above... http://www.megapixel.net/reviews/panasonic-fz3/fz3-gen.php
__________________
Database and Website Consulting Services in Chicago Last edited by einreb; 04-15-2005 at 05:08 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
Quote:
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Light,Nimble,Uncivilized
|
Isn't that your old camera?
![]()
__________________
Drago '69 Coupe R #464 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
who, me? . . .I still have my Minolta. It's well used, and over two years old. . .but still liking it a lot. It is fast, even by todays standards (from what I've seen).
The nicest (now mainstream ) feature I wished it had, would be the image stabilizing deal. . . .for all those sunroof periscoping shots -- damn buffetting wind. ![]()
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Hmmm. You need a lens that will go from fairly wide-angle (to photograph Porsches up close, and get the whole car into the frame) to real telephoto (to photograph Porsches on the track, rather far from you, and have the car fill the frame). You need a camera with minimal shutter lag (the delay between pressing the shutter button and the camera setting exposure, autofocusing, and then taking the picture). You also need a camera that will take several shots in quick succession. You need a camera that will take some video. Finally, you don't want to spend too much.
Given the budget, I think you should look at the Panasonic Lumix FZ20. It has an excellent lens, a Leica zoom that covers 36mm to 436mm (in 35mm film camera equivalent). 36mm is a moderate wide-angle, 436mm is a long telephoto that will reach out and fill the frame with a race car 100 ft away. The lens is fast (f2.8 throughout the range), which isn't so crucial for you, since it sounds like you'll be shooting in daylight, but does allow faster shutter speeds (to freeze action) and wide apertures (to get selective focus). The lens can be manually focused using a traditional focus ring (useful at the track, if you want to prefocus on a corner and shoot as cars come through). The lens has image stabilization, useful when hand-holding at 436mm. It will shoot a burst at 2 or 3 frames/second. It takes short movie clips in Quicktime. The full shutter lag is only so-so at 1 second, but if you have the shutter button half-pressed (i.e. the camera autofocus has already focused), then the lag from there is very short (1/10 sec). I'm going to guess that in manual focus mode, the full shutter lag would be very short. The negatives of the FZ20 are that it uses SD cards, not CF cards, si it can't use the 1+GB microdrive CF cards (tiny hard drives). With the falling price of flash memory, this may be less of an issue. It also has "noise" in the image when using film speeds (there's no film, of course, so this really means the light sensitivity setting) above 200 ISO. For daylight shooting and with the fast f2.8 lens, I think 200 ISO is fine. The FZ20 is around $600, I think. The older FZ10 might still be available, its pretty similar. The Panasonic FZ5 (replaced the FZ3) is quite similar, but is a slightly smaller camera and lacks the manual focus feature, and the hotshoe for an exernal flash. It apparently has a bit less full shutter lag and may have a bit less noise at 400 ISO. I think it is somewhat cheaper. Myself, I would get the FZ20 for the manual focus option. I wouldn't buy a digital SLR (like the Canon Digital Rebel) unless you plan to ultimately spend $2000+ on the body and a couple of lenses. I would not buy a compact point-and-shoot type digital camera. They won't get the pictures you're describing. Personally, my SLRs are film since I like to develop and print the old-fashioned way. But I've used the FZ20 and talked to users, and that is the digital camera I'd get if I were going to spend <$1000. Go to www.dpreview.com for more info and detailed tests.
__________________
1989 3.2 Carrera coupe; 1988 Westy Vanagon, Zetec; 1986 E28 M30; 1994 W124; 2004 S211 What? Uh . . . “he” and “him”? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 518
|
As a new owner of a FZ20, all I can say is WOW. The zoom is great, long life battery, super fast shooting...it is a bit over your budget, I paid $530 online at Circuit City and then drove ten minutes to pick it up, spring for a 1 gig SD card and fire away!
Good luck. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 518
|
Here is an example of FZ20 in the hands of a true amateur (me) taken today at TBall. I was at least 20 feet away. Love that Leica lens, big zoom and image stabiization. BTW, Panasonic will release the FZ5 this month at $499, not quite the FZ20 but real close.
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,943
|
Its hard to beat anything with the name Leica on it. Yes, its bloody expensive but their quality is excellent.
JoeA
__________________
2013 Jag XF, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
newms, what is the shutter lag with focus on manual? Was my guess that it would be very short correct? I define shutter lag as time from first pressing the button until the camera takes the picture.
__________________
1989 3.2 Carrera coupe; 1988 Westy Vanagon, Zetec; 1986 E28 M30; 1994 W124; 2004 S211 What? Uh . . . “he” and “him”? |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dismal Nitch, AZ
Posts: 9,042
|
Whatever you eventually get, I suggest an extended warranty. I bought my first Nikon CP4500 (US version) from B & H Photo 2.5 yrs. ago for $400+ w/a 5 yr. Mack warranty ($49). Sent it in for a problem last December. They sent it to Nikon for repair. Cost me $9+ for s/h. Bought my second CP4500 (International version) from B & H last month for $300+, also w/a 5 yr. Mack warranty ($59) - Nikon won't repair the International models unless sent to them by a warranty station like Mack cameras.
. More on ext'd warranties: if you buy it using a VISA card, you can also buy VISA's ext'd warranty for cheap. I wasn't aware of this when I bought that first Nikon. VISA won't do a warranty on an International item. . http://usa.visa.com/personal/cards/credit/visa_signature_benefits_wm.html#anchor_6 . Good luck.
__________________
Don . "Fully integrated people, in their transparency, tend to not be subject to mechanisms of defense, disguise, deceit, and fraudulence." - - Don R. 1994, an excerpt from My Ass From a Hole in the Ground - A Comparative View |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
well, I ordered the FZ20, so we'll see how it behaves. I'll be comparing it to a D70 SLR and previous Canon small ones.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 518
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|