Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Miscellaneous and Off Topic Forums > Off Topic Discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
curlesw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: No VA
Posts: 862
Garage
Digital picture question

OK, digital camera guys, here’s a question for you. I have a Nikon D70 that provides 6 mega pixel pictures. The quality of the picture is great and I can print large prints. However, when I want 4x6 prints I don’t think I need 6 mega pixel worth of quality. The question, when printing 4x6 prints, what is the recommend pixel and dpi to get a good print. The reason I am asking is that when my wife and I order prints on-line it takes a while to up load a 2.5 meg file, if we can reduce the file size and while retaining picture quality that will reduce the upload time and complaining from the wife on how long it takes to upload the pictures.

Make sense or have I missed the boat?

V/r
Wayne C.

Old 10-06-2005, 11:54 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,753
Generally a 300ppi image resolution will print very nicely.

Things to concern yourself with are that from the pixel number itself (6 MP in this example) it is impossible to know the resolution with out knowing the image size. Additionally, a common misconception is the believed equivalence of dots-per-inch and pixels-per-inch which is not even close to being equivalent in reality.

So what to do: If you have some form of image manipulation software, it should have the capability of doing image resizing. Open an image and find the resizing tool. It should give you the ability to set image size and resolution. Set it to 4x6 and 300ppi and save it as a JPEG at a quality or "9" or above. Of course, all the different software packages have different ways of doing this so it is impossible to give an absolute methodology.

Hope this helps.
__________________
gary
Old 10-06-2005, 01:21 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
The user manual outlines ways to cut down on file size. You can adjust both the quality and size of the capture. I'd experiment with a few different type pics and settle on what's good for you.


Firmware upgrade for your model:
Firmware upgrade:http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?goingto=dtc_home

User Manual: http://support.nikontech.com/cgi-bin/nikonusa.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp.php?p_prods=19%2C56&p_pv=2.56&p_cats=187&p_cv=1.187

__________________
Warren & Ron, may you rest in Peace.
Old 10-06-2005, 01:34 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
Try shooting at different camera resolutions.

I've found a 400-600K file size to be fine for 4x6s. For example:

In Photoshop, a 72 dpi image with the following dimensions:
Pixel width = 2288
Pixel height = 1712
Document w = 31.7 in.
Document h = 23.7 in.
File size - 356K

..... is equivalent to a 300 dpi image with:
Pixel width = 2280
Pixel height = 1712
Document w = 7.6 in.
Document h = 5.6 in.
File size - 356K

Same number of pixels; however, one file has them spread over a 31x23 in. document dimension, the other over a 7.6 x 5.6 in. dimension, but they're equivalent.

As a test, give your photo processor an image shot with different camera settings (use a cue card so you can ID them), make a 4x6 in. print of each, then see if you can find any quality differences between them. You might find very subtle differences, if any.

However, you don't want to shoot that once in a lifetime image at the lowest 4x6 resolution. It won't look as nice at larger sizes, and while there are software programs to replace missing pixels, you usually don't want to go this route. Shoot as high as you can, then use a photo program to reduce the resolution specs (above). Archive the original, dump the rejects, and print the reduced size version.

Hope this helps,
Sherwood

Edited: corrected some numbers in the text to match

Last edited by 911pcars; 10-06-2005 at 08:23 PM..
Old 10-06-2005, 03:10 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Oh Haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
Porsche Crest Digital camera battery life

I have a cheap Kodak Easyshare camera. It will not turn on even though the dock charger tells me the batterie are fully charged.
How long should the batteries live? The camera is about three years old. Thanks
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015
Pacific Blue

Wayne
Old 10-06-2005, 06:42 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
curlesw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: No VA
Posts: 862
Garage
Thanks for the input guy.

Sherwood, the Photoshop info is most helpful. I still plan to shoot images at max resolution but then export to a lower quality for printing on 4x6...these dimensions give me a good starting point...this is diffiently a trial-and-error thing, but I've got a good start, thanks!

v/r
Wayne C.
Old 10-06-2005, 08:03 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Back in the saddle again
 
masraum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 55,761
Re: Digital camera battery life

Quote:
Originally posted by Oh Haha
I have a cheap Kodak Easyshare camera. It will not turn on even though the dock charger tells me the batterie are fully charged.
How long should the batteries live? The camera is about three years old. Thanks
I have/had an older Kodak easy share. I also had a problem with the batteries. What I found to work that was BTW a total pain in the butt was that you put the camera on watch the lights on the dock like a hawk, as soon as they indicate that the battery is charged take the thing off, let it sit for 5 minutes and put it back on. Keep doing that until the total battery charge time is about 2 hours.

I found that on the internet on a camera forum. It had been posted by a Kodak employee and worked for me other than being a pain. One Note: if you forget to check and the thing charges full and then sits for too long it'll run the charge down pretty quick so you have to really stay on it.

Also if you use the CR-3V battery (I think that's the name, it looks like two AA batteries that are joined together) then you can use two AA rechargeable batteries, but only use the lithium rechargeables, not regular cheapo alkaline.
__________________
Steve
'08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960
- never named a car before, but this is Charlotte.
'88 targa SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten
Old 10-06-2005, 09:03 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
I understand the early Kodak P&Ss ate batteries at a fairly rapid rate (only two AA- equivalent batteries - not enough). Last I looked, the preferred rechargeable AAs are ones made by Powerex along with a MAHA charger.

Still, if the camera doesn't boot up with fresh batteries, even alkalines, there might be something wrong w/the camera. Do you have an AC adapter you can connect?

Sherwood

Old 10-06-2005, 09:50 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:44 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.